Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

🛑БУДЬТЕ В БЕЗПЕЦІ!🛑

@bezpeka_tut

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Cite this entry

15,195subscribers

-30 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001885021089
TypeChannel
Username@bezpeka_tut
Created22 February 2023measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/bezpeka_tut

Topic

National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 59% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Views per post sit far above this size band

20,200 average views per post against 15,195 subscribers — an engagement rate of 133.0%. Across the 1,754 registered channels in the same cohort — 10,014–31,615 subscribers, posting mainly in Ukrainian — the middle half sit between 11.2% and 31.2%, with a median of 19.4%.

What this was computed from
Window30 days (13 July 2026 12 August 2026)
Posts measured19 of 19 published in the window (0 exact, 19 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled383,950
Mature posts only137.7% over 18 posts read at least 24h after publication
Subscribers15,195 measured 12 August 2026
Cohortb10000:ukr · 1,754 channels · p10 6.39% · p25 11.2% · p50 19.4% · p75 31.2% · p90 49.0%
Position in cohort99.315th percentile · 6.9× the cohort median
Uncertainty±0.193% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding
Post languageUkrainian · 89.5%of the window’s posts

When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.

This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal.A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.

Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 12 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

15,19515,22515,2106 August 2026 — 15,225 subscribers6 August 2026 — 15,225 subscribers6 August 2026 — 15,223 subscribers8 August 2026 — 15,213 subscribers9 August 2026 — 15,208 subscribers10 August 2026 — 15,203 subscribers11 August 2026 — 15,200 subscribers12 August 2026 — 15,195 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
8 measurements spanning 6 days, net -30. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 15,191–15,230 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 20:3415,195-5
11 Aug 2026, 21:4615,200-3
10 Aug 2026, 20:0215,203-5
9 Aug 2026, 21:5215,208-5
8 Aug 2026, 20:5115,213-10
6 Aug 2026, 22:2015,223-2
6 Aug 2026, 10:0315,225no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:4415,225first reading

Engagement

22 posts held, back to 5 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
133.0%
avg views ÷ 15,195 subscribers
Avg views / post
20,200
19 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.723%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
19
of 22 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held22 (5 July 202611 August 2026)
Views total383,950
Reactions total2,776
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 10:46 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

3,396 reactions across 22 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🙏1,43442.2%
😭51715.2%
49314.5%
🤬47714.0%
😢2437.16%
😡671.97%
🤯561.65%
🤣300.883%
👀260.766%
😱170.501%
👍130.383%
🔥130.383%
🍌40.118%
🤩30.088%
🤷‍♂20.059%
10.029%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 22 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,396reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 5 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 22 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @bezpeka_tut. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 22 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 July 2026 to 11 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 20:02 UTC≈7,350 views180 reactionsread 12 August 2026

🔴🔴🔴До 50 балістичних ракет та «Циркони» можуть бути готові до запуску в рф. Основна увага — Києву та області!!! ❗️❗️❗️Загроза актуальна практично для кожної області України!!!

🙏136🤬383😭3

8 Aug 2026, 20:14 UTC≈11,700 views159 reactionsread 12 August 2026

🔴🔴🔴Максимальна увага до тривог найближчі 24 години!!! Знову можлива велика кількість балістичних ракет!!!

🙏120🤬363

5 Aug 2026, 04:20 UTC≈18,600 views183 reactionsread 12 August 2026

😭😭😭14 людей загинули, 27 отримали поранення.

😭136🙏22😢15🤬54😡1

4 Aug 2026, 21:54 UTC≈19,300 views161 reactionsread 12 August 2026

🔴🔴🔴За останні 20 хвилин по Києву та області було застосовано 25-30 ракет.

😭98🙏39😡164🔥4

3 Aug 2026, 13:46 UTC≈19,400 views182 reactionsread 12 August 2026

🙏🙏🙏Зеленський пропонує путіну перемир'я в повітрі, закінчити удари по енергетиці, заморозити війну на лінії фронту і почати важкі переговори: він також готовий до зустрічі, — радник ОП Михайло Подоляк

🙏141🤣19👍116🤩3👀2

1 Aug 2026, 05:28 UTC≈22,000 views140 reactionsread 12 August 2026

😭😭😭Вночі росія атакувала Київ балістикою: 9 загиблих, 28 постраждалих!

😢80😭39🙏201

31 Jul 2026, 19:36 UTC≈21,200 views134 reactionsread 12 August 2026

По стратегічній авіації поки тиша, але у ворога напоготові достатня кількість балістики!!!ʼ

🙏108🤬224

31 Jul 2026, 18:29 UTC≈20,700 views181 reactionsread 12 August 2026

🔴🔴🔴Реагуйте на тривогу цієї ночі, не важливо в якій області ви проживаєте!!!

🙏159😢201🤬1

29 Jul 2026, 21:06 UTC≈22,300 views101 reactionsread 12 August 2026

🔴🔴🔴Фіксуються вильоти стратегічної авіації!

🙏73🤬20😭62

29 Jul 2026, 19:24 UTC≈21,100 views164 reactionsread 12 August 2026

🔴🔴🔴Я останнім часом публікую дуже мало інформації, але хочу наголосити що існує дуже велика вірогідність нанесення масованого ракетного удару по нашій території!!! ❗️❗️❗️Як завжди максимальна увага киянам!!! ❗️❗️❗️❗️Не ігнорувати тривогу усім регіонам України найближчі 24-48 годин!!!

🙏134😭1514🔥1

21 Jul 2026, 20:11 UTC≈24,600 views248 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Факти про нового Головнокомандувача: ❗️Йому 43 роки. Генерал-майор, професійний військовий і танкіст за освітою. ❗️Пройшов шлях з низу, а не прийшов одразу у високий штаб. 9 травня 2014 року Драпатий командував 2-м механізованим батальйоном 72-ї бригади, який отримав наказ прорватися до захопленого управління міліції та допомогти звільнити заручників. БМП його підрозділу буквально "перелетіла" через барикаду прихильн

207🙏36🍌4🔥1

21 Jul 2026, 20:07 UTC≈17,500 views48 reactionsread 12 August 2026

❤️Драпатий стане головнокомандувачем ЗСУ, — президент Зеленський

48

Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @bezpeka_tut. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“🛑БУДЬТЕ В БЕЗПЕЦІ!🛑” (@bezpeka_tut), 15,195 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bezpeka_tut.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.