5 measurements spanning 10 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,128–2,131 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
16 Aug 2026, 16:57
2,131
+3
13 Aug 2026, 01:03
2,128
-1
9 Aug 2026, 23:41
2,129
-1
6 Aug 2026, 11:21
2,130
no change
6 Aug 2026, 10:30
2,130
first reading
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 15 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
3m 30s
Average length
3m 30s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
444 reactions across 17 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
165
37.2%
👍
130
29.3%
🔥
78
17.6%
🙏
21
4.73%
💔
11
2.48%
🤔
5
1.13%
😍
4
0.901%
✍
3
0.676%
🎉
3
0.676%
👎
3
0.676%
👏
3
0.676%
💯
3
0.676%
🕊
3
0.676%
❤🔥
2
0.45%
🤬
2
0.45%
🥰
2
0.45%
🫡
2
0.45%
🍾
1
0.225%
👻
1
0.225%
😱
1
0.225%
1 further kind
1
0.225%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 444reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 15 January 2026 to 27 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 18 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @bez_statinov. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 15 January 2026 to 27 March 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Журнал Ланцет ретрагировал редакционную статью о безопасности талька — спустя почти 50 лет выяснилось, что обзор был заказным, текст согласовывался с Johnson&Johnson.
В 1977 выход этого обзора снизил обеспокоенность FDA, врачей и общественности по поводу рисков использования продуктов с тальком, сыграл значимую роль в отказе регулятора от тестирования косметического талька на примеси асбеста.
Статья десятилетиями ис…
Однажды Чак Норрис...
Легенда Голливуда и мемов, 86-летний спортсмен, который всю жизнь поддерживал превосходную форму и был фитнес-гуру для многих, почувствовал себя плохо после тренировки и умер в госпитале.
Несмотря на отсутствие официальной информации о причине смерти, в сети все больше спекуляций в пользу сердечного приступа.
Репортеры The National Enquirer выяснили, что летом 2017 Норрис перенес инфаркт миок…
Больше о Roseburia🌹inulinivorans, повысившей мышечную силу на 30% в новом исследовании
❓Здравствуйте! А эта "знаменитость" живёт у всех людей в кишечнике? Или её надо заселять? И как?
В здоровом кишечнике Roseburia spp. могут составлять от 3 до 15% от общего количества бактерий. В отличие от некоторых других комменсалов, бактерии рода Roseburia отсутствуют в кишечной микробиоте новорожденных и колонизируют кишечник…
Проснулась знаменитой Roseburia inulinivorans — теперь это кишечная бактерия, дающая силу, а не простая анаэробная трудяжка, которая ферментирует инулин и продуцирует масляную кислоту (бутират).
Присутствие и уровни R. inulinivorans в микробиоме кишечника показали связь с мышечной силой у молодых и пожилых людей, а также в мышиной модели.
Исследование команды из Испании и Голландии, результаты которого опубликованы…
Новые данные о бемпедоевой кислоте — подтвержден третий механизм воздействия на липидный обмен.
Большинству пациентов с дислипидемией, не обусловленной генетическими мутациями, можно нормализовать уровни липидов нефармацевтическими методами. Однако для пациентов с семейной гиперхолестеринемией (самое распространенное генетическое заболевание в белой расе) статины долгое время были единственным решением.
Бемпедоевая …
Инфаркт после тренировки у талантливого молодого мужчины — интенсивные физические нагрузки/регулярный спорт могут быть триггером для людей с невыявленными проблемами.
Мы уже перечисляли некоторые состояния, которые не выявляют регулярные стандартные анализы и которые могут стать причиной сердечно-сосудистой катастрофы.
В их числе скрытый атеросклероз при нормальном холестерине.
Еще в конце 00-х в масштабном исследо…
К участникам протокола Без статинов + INSPIRO отправились первые подборки продуктов высокоферментируемой растительной кухни.
В их числе несравненная кодзи-морковь — благодаря ей переработанное мясо удается исключить из рациона даже тем, кто не мыслил жизни без колбас и копченостей.
Ферментация с культурой кодзи — в основе превращения моркови в растительную салями с плотной, сухой консистенцией и характерным балансо…
У одного пациента ЛПНП-холестерин 6,5, и он живёт до 90. У другого — инфаркт при ЛПНП-ХС 3,2.
Риски сердечно-сосудистых трагедий реализуются только при наличии эндотелиальной дисфункции и хронического воспаления. Уровень холестерина имеет второстепенное значение.
Можно встретить пациентов с высоким уровнем холестерина и полным отсутствием СС-рисков.
Mitochondrial Nutrient-Sensing Dysfunction — ключевой механизм ста…
Завирусившийся сервис Death Clock весь прошлый год предсказывал дату и причины смерти, демонстрируя редкую честность и сообщая пользователям, что они, возможно, умрут от превентивной медицины (на скриншоте).
И вот мы узнали, как именно случится смерть от превентивной медицины.
Достигнув "более миллиона загрузок и десятков тысяч платящих пользователей", создатели аппа объявили о запуске Life Lab — "AI-консьержа здор…
Рынок БАД в РФ оказался в 2 раза больше ожидаемого
Оператор Честного знака оценил в 279 млрд рублей объём легального рынка биодобавок на основе суммы всех транзакций с маркированными БАДами за 2025 год. Эксперты оценивали рынок до маркировки всего в 102 млрд, продажи БАДов за 9 месяцев 2025 — в 130 млрд.
Объём коммерческого рынка лекарств РФ в 2025 по оценке DSM Group — 1850 млрд рублей, безрецептурные препараты эт…
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @bez_statinov. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Красное мясо (говядина, баранина, свинина), животные жиры (сливочное масло, сало) и продукты из них
Ем ежедневно/почти ежедневно — не представляю, как без них обходиться32%
Могу сократить или уже сократил(а) потребление до 300—500 г в неделю33%
Могу сократить или уже сократил(а) потребление до 10—15 раз в год14%
Не употребляю по медицинским показаниям1%
Не употребляю по личным соображениям6%
Другое (напишу в комментариях)4%
Хочу посмотреть результаты10%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 15 January 2026 to 27 March 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 121,838 of 1,481,243entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Без статинов” (@bez_statinov), 2,131 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bez_statinov.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.