Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for BEYOND THE CUT!

Channel

BEYOND THE CUT!

@beyondthecutbywan

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry

5,276subscribers

-73 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002336487888
TypeChannel
Username@beyondthecutbywan
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 September 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/beyondthecutbywan

Growth

5,2765,3495,312.57 August 2026 — 5,349 subscribers8 August 2026 — 5,348 subscribers11 August 2026 — 5,343 subscribers14 August 2026 — 5,337 subscribers17 August 2026 — 5,331 subscribers20 August 2026 — 5,325 subscribers24 August 2026 — 5,314 subscribers27 August 2026 — 5,307 subscribers30 August 2026 — 5,303 subscribers2 September 2026 — 5,296 subscribers7 September 2026 — 5,276 subscribers7 August 20267 September 2026
11 measurements spanning 31 days, net -73. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,265–5,360 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Sept 2026, 21:015,276-20
2 Sept 2026, 19:335,296-7
30 Aug 2026, 07:135,303-4
27 Aug 2026, 03:425,307-7
24 Aug 2026, 09:435,314-11
20 Aug 2026, 10:045,325-6
17 Aug 2026, 18:555,331-6
14 Aug 2026, 15:585,337-6
11 Aug 2026, 05:455,343-5
8 Aug 2026, 06:485,348-1
7 Aug 2026, 11:465,349first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 6 December 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 January 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

381 reactions across 18 posts, in 23 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
16643.6%
🔥5715.0%
🤡4311.3%
👏184.72%
123.15%
👍123.15%
🤣112.89%
🎄92.36%
🖕92.36%
🍓71.84%
🤝71.84%
👎61.57%
😁61.57%
🆒41.05%
🍌41.05%
😱20.525%
🤷‍♂20.525%
👌10.262%
💩10.262%
🤓10.262%
3 further kinds30.787%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 381 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 6 December 2025 to 6 January 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Jan 2026, 23:17 UTC≈2,800 views14 reactionsread 12 August 2026

yo if anyone hasn't seen yet i made a new teaser for the naughtyyjuan method: https://youtu.be/81KuwjHRO_w?si=pPYTjEfaj6HpGYHO

14

30 Dec 2025, 21:44 UTC≈3,330 views21 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Voice message

Voice message, posted without a caption

8🤝5👍2😱2🆒2👌1🖕1

29 Dec 2025, 22:22 UTC≈3,120 views25 reactionsread 12 August 2026

some thoughts while everyone's still in food coma lmao the gap between $100 and $1000 editors isn't skill. it's belief. once u believe ur work transforms businesses, clients feel that energy through the screen. but belief without method is just delusion bruh😭 that's why some talented editors stay broke. they believe but don't know HOW to translate that into attraction. 2026 can be different. but only if u make i

15👏6🤣4

28 Dec 2025, 21:19 UTC≈2,650 views14 reactionsread 12 August 2026

remember that challenge where i started from zero and landed a $650 client in less than 2 weeks? i documented everything. every strategy. every mindset shift. every "aha" moment. i will also be doing something similar in 2026 (much bigger tho) but you’ll see that. anyways, i turned it into a playbook that some people would charge $500 for. but since we're in that weird week between christmas and new year where no

13👍1

27 Dec 2025, 19:15 UTC≈2,470 views11 reactionsread 12 August 2026

yo christmas was 2 days ago and i got a question... what'd u get? new plugins? another course u won't finish? here's what my students got: a brand new apple animation pack + 15 hours of game while everyone else was eating turkey. the difference is they stopped playing the game everyone else plays. the mentorship is open. $3k to completely flip how clients see u. but honestly? most of u will read this, feel motiv

9👍1🔥1

26 Dec 2025, 21:57 UTCviews —

BEYOND THE CUT! pinned «YOOO today is THE day‼️ if you’re in this channel - you’re interested in being my student. today is the day you will get the chance to learn from the best editor in the entire industry (RESPECTFULLY) y’all already know how it goes. i ain’t gonna write…»

26 Dec 2025, 20:42 UTC≈2,290 views18 reactionsread 12 August 2026

YOOO today is THE day‼️ if you’re in this channel - you’re interested in being my student. today is the day you will get the chance to learn from the best editor in the entire industry (RESPECTFULLY) y’all already know how it goes. i ain’t gonna write a long ahh post and just link the free training. watch it and follow the next step. 2026 is the year i’m taking over, and i’ll make sure you get your bag if you’re

10👎5🔥2🫡1

22 Dec 2025, 22:59 UTC≈2,450 views50 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Voice message

My Plans For 2026🔥🚀

🤡38🎄92🔥1

20 Dec 2025, 18:22 UTC≈2,690 views24 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Voice message

Dropped a whole podcast😭😭

👏94🍌4😁3🔥2🤷‍♂2

20 Dec 2025, 00:36 UTC≈2,690 views24 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

let my manager see the new youtube vid LMAO

🔥16🤣5😁21

16 Dec 2025, 20:41 UTC≈2,860 views17 reactionsread 12 August 2026

something i see/hear every day: "the market's too saturated" this shit always comes from very talented editors too. y’all are convinced there's "too many editors" now. here's the thing tho... last week i turned down 3 projects. literally said no to money because i'm booked. Dani? same thing. getting messages like "when's your next availability?" instead of "what's your rate?" so if it's "saturated" why are goo

16😁1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @beyondthecutbywan. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“BEYOND THE CUT!” (@beyondthecutbywan), 5,276 subscribers as measured 7 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/beyondthecutbywan.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.