Channel
@bewhaleapp
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
2,476subscribers
-9 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002174064662 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @bewhaleapp |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 9 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/bewhaleapp |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 21:55 | 2,476 | -6 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 19:54 | 2,482 | -3 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 05:34 | 2,485 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 03:03 | 2,485 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 24 October 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 31 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
93 reactions across 18 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 28 | 30.1% | |
| 🔥 | 18 | 19.4% | |
| ❤ | 12 | 12.9% | |
| 🐳 | 7 | 7.53% | |
| 👏 | 6 | 6.45% | |
| 👀 | 4 | 4.30% | |
| 🫡 | 4 | 4.30% | |
| 😁 | 3 | 3.23% | |
| 💯 | 2 | 2.15% | |
| 😭 | 2 | 2.15% | |
| ☃ | 1 | 1.08% | |
| ⚡ | 1 | 1.08% | |
| 💔 | 1 | 1.08% | |
| 💩 | 1 | 1.08% | |
| 😢 | 1 | 1.08% | |
| 🙏 | 1 | 1.08% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 1.08% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 93reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 24 October 2025 to 31 December 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @bewhaleapp. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 24 October 2025 to 31 December 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Happy New Year from BeWhale! 🎄🎁 2025 reminded everyone what crypto really is: volatile, demanding, and full of opportunity for those who stay curious and disciplined. Thank you for being with us through market swings, lessons, and growth. Wishing you clarity, patience, and good decisions in the new year. See you in 2026 🐳
❤8👍7
Crypto Spends Another Week Going Nowhere 🤷♂️ Crypto spent most of the week range-bound, failing to extend early strength as traders stayed cautious heading into mid-December 👇 🔴 BTC started the week around 90.69k, briefly touched a low of 88.15k, and ends the week near 90.1k, marking another flat finish despite active intraday swings. 🔴 ETH opened near 3126, slid to about 2941, and finishes at 3068, echoing Bitcoi…
👍3😁3
Friendly reminder 🚨 2025 has already shown how fast things can flip from sudden liquidation cascades to overnight sentiment swings. You don’t control volatility, but you do control your exposure. 👉 Risk management isn’t optional. Small position sizes, clear invalidation, no overleveraging. That’s what keeps you in the game when the market gets loud.
👍2💯2
BTC Dumps Below 89k as Late-Week Selloff Hits Hard 😭 Crypto gave up early-week stability and slid sharply into Friday ⬇️ 🔴 BTC started the week around 91.5k, dipped to 83.9k midweek, then rallied all the way to 93.93k before dropping back to 88.4k today. 🔴 ETH opened near 3035, slid to 2726 midweek, bounced to 3220, and then fell again to 3012 today. 🔴 Total market cap is now about $3.03T, wiping out a chunk of the …
🔥3❤1💔1
🏆 Top 5 Whale Cards of November: Who’s Leading the Pack? November closed with a 17.4% market drawdown, the weakest November since 2018. Even in a red month, users stayed active inside BeWhale and explored which whales were moving the most. These were the most activated Whale Cards of November and how their wallets changed during the month: 1️⃣. Animoca Brands (–54.55%)🔽 From $10.65M to $4.84M, down $5.81M. 2️⃣. Wo…
👍3🐳1
Is This the Start of a Recovery… or Just Noise? 🧐 Crypto bounced off extreme lows this week. Bitcoin and Ethereum both climbed, altcoins rotated sharply, but macro flows are still controlling sentiment more than anything happening inside the ecosystem. ⚡️ Market Snapshot 🟠 Bitcoin traded from $84,120 → $90,819, showing relief after last week’s capitulation levels. 🟠 Ethereum moved from $2,756 → $3,039, recovering s…
❤2👍1🙏1
What do you check first when you open your crypto apps❓
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Myth: Whales cause all the volatility 💭 Reality: Retail liquidity is fragile — that’s where sudden swings come from ✅ Whales prefer accumulation during quiet periods. Sharp moves often come from: 🟢 overleveraged long/short wipeouts 🟢 retail panic-selling 🟢 FOMO chasing tops Whales rarely need to “manipulate.” The crowd does it for them. Explore trader strategies, not market noise → Start with BeWhale
👏4🐳1
How Much Lower Can Crypto Go? 😨 Another punishing week for the market. Bitcoin and Ethereum sold off sharply, altcoins struggled with low liquidity, and risk assets across the board dropped as macro uncertainty intensified. ⚡️ Market Snapshot 🟠 Bitcoin traded from 96,830 → 84,840, even dipping near 81,000 today before bouncing slightly. 🟠 Ethereum moved from 3,206 → 2,783, with an intraday low around 2,613. 🟠 Total…
😭2
👨🏫 Whale Moves & Lessons: The Celsius Risk Spiral In 2021–2022, Celsius — once managing billions and branding itself as a “smart-yield” platform — wrecked its balance sheet through a series of catastrophic trading decisions. Instead of hedging responsibly, they chased tops, panic-sold bottoms, and traded emotionally at scale. 1️⃣. The Setup Celsius aggressively deployed user funds into high-risk positions. Their t…
👍3☃1
How are you feeling about the market right now❓
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Is It Over? 📉 This week saw major weakness across crypto. Both BTC and ETH slid from their start-of-week levels, selective altcoins held up surprisingly well, and macro signals turned cold. ⚡️ Market Snapshot 🟠 Bitcoin ranged from ~$101.22K → ~$96.91K. 🟠 Ethereum ranged from ~$3,314 → ~$3,229. 🟠 Total crypto market cap is about $3.29 trillion, showing broad weakness. 🏛 Institutional & Market Highlights 🔵 The longe…
🔥1😢1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @bewhaleapp. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
What do you check first when you open your crypto apps❓
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
How are you feeling about the market right now❓
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 24 October 2025 to 31 December 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 1,022,860 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“BeWhale” (@bewhaleapp), 2,476 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bewhaleapp.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.