Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for oilshark

Channel

oilshark

@bespolezneey

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

77subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002441218789
TypeChannel
Username@bespolezneey
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 18 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/bespolezneey

Growth

7711 Aug 2026, 23:46 — 77 subscribers12 Aug 2026, 09:54 — 77 subscribers11 Aug 2026, 23:4612 Aug 2026, 09:54
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 76–78 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 09:5477no change
11 Aug 2026, 23:4677first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 26 August 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 October 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
46s
Average length
15s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

122 reactions across 11 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 54589128649642128423528.7%
custom 54586635979472543542621.3%
custom 54562641328629661842419.7%
custom 54741407960662108422419.7%
custom 54589030509639417461310.7%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 122reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 26 August 2025 to 16 October 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
16
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 20 we hold a reading for · 15%
Most on one post
13
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @bespolezneey. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 26 August 2025 to 16 October 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

16 Oct 2025, 21:07 UTC722 views9 reactions2 Starsread 11 August 2026
Photo

MASSACRE SoundCloud VK prod. by fwirx, ?man, TEKPRA, LINKEY, qnddii

custom 54562641328629661843custom 54589128649642128423custom 54586635979472543542custom 54741407960662108421

7 Oct 2025, 04:09 UTC351 viewsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @aa3phyx1af3t1shPhoto

psy0psss, Kvikky - СЕРПСКI ТОЧКА МП3 СК: https://on.soundcloud.com/HxJw7U5Tg2P822Nboh ВК (плейлист): https://vk.com/music?z=audio_playlist-231532771_2/a497fcef22fc917c59

1 Oct 2025, 19:56 UTC314 views11 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

🌪🪐

custom 54741407960662108425custom 54562641328629661843custom 54586635979472543543

20 Sept 2025, 18:00 UTC322 views15 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

#шалавасидидома

custom 54589128649642128427custom 54562641328629661844custom 54586635979472543544

13 Sept 2025, 18:53 UTC335 views6 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Линейка короче 30 см - хуета.. У меня Охуительная Линейка

custom 54586635979472543542custom 54589128649642128422custom 54741407960662108422

13 Sept 2025, 18:52 UTC341 views8 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Пью за Дональда Путина и Владимира Трампа,. Алко не берёт больше((

custom 54589030509639417464custom 54562641328629661842custom 54589128649642128422

12 Sept 2025, 16:05 UTC381 views20 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

🌵🍄

custom 54562641328629661848custom 54589030509639417464custom 54741407960662108424custom 54586635979472543542custom 54589128649642128422

10 Sept 2025, 20:12 UTC330 views8 reactions1 Starread 11 August 2026
Photo

Никогда не покупайте эту хуйню. Очень не вкусно😝

custom 54589128649642128428

6 Sept 2025, 03:38 UTC347 views21 reactions13 Starsread 11 August 2026

💊💊💊

custom 54589128649642128427custom 54741407960662108426custom 54586635979472543545custom 54589030509639417462custom 54562641328629661841

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @bespolezneey. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,140,960 of 1,549,704entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“oilshark” (@bespolezneey), 77 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bespolezneey.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.