Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for خرید فیلترشکن سرور کانفیگ

Channel

خرید فیلترشکن سرور کانفیگ

@beshcan

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry

170,401subscribers

+31,011 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001044320362
TypeChannel
Username@beshcan
Descriptionفروش فیلترشکن سریع، پایدار و بدون محدودیت 💪🌍 √ قابل استفاده روی تمام پلتفرم‌ها ( ویندوز – اندروید – iOS ) 🤖 | تست رایگان و خرید ← @BeshcanBot 👨🏻‍💻 | پشتیبانی فروش ← @BeshcanSupport 🤝 | کانال رسمی ← @Beshcan
CreatedBetween 1 January 2016 and 31 October 2016 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 November 2026
Measurements held64
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/beshcan

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 73% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 7 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@beshcan/278 · this entry3 Aug 2026, 17:22 UTC@vpn_Click/1609911 Aug 2026, 15:51 UTC1.008 days
@beshcan/271 · this entry26 Jul 2026, 15:31 UTC@vpn_Click/1626518 Aug 2026, 16:00 UTC1.0023 days
@beshcan/313 · this entry5 Sept 2026, 11:07 UTC@vpn_Click/167025 Sept 2026, 12:18 UTC1.0071 minutes
@beshcan/328 · this entry14 Sept 2026, 13:48 UTC@vpn_Click/1693214 Sept 2026, 16:32 UTC1.002.7 hours
@beshcan/320 · this entry10 Sept 2026, 12:58 UTC@vpn_Click/1698816 Sept 2026, 16:23 UTC1.006 days
@beshcan/329 · this entry15 Sept 2026, 16:28 UTC@vpn_Click/1728929 Sept 2026, 11:27 UTC1.0014 days
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@vpn_Click11 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.004.5 hoursthis entry (11–0)
@proxymtprotoir11 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.004.5 hoursthis entry (11–0)
@v2rayngvpn11 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.004.5 hoursthis entry (11–0)
@khabarfuri11 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.004.5 hoursthis entry (11–0)
@Broz_time10 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.004.3 hoursthis entry (10–0)
@GiveVPN9 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.003.8 hoursthis entry (9–0)
@dolar_navasan5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.003.2 hoursthis entry (5–0)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 114 comparable posts for this entry, running 14 July 2026 to 10 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Views per post sit far above this size band

125,000 average views per post against 168,031 subscribers — an engagement rate of 74.1%. Across the 1,134 registered channels in the same cohort — 100,071–316,044 subscribers, posting mainly in Persian — the middle half sit between 1.83% and 8.77%, with a median of 4.23%.

What this was computed from
Window30 days (6 October 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Posts measured28 of 28 published in the window (0 exact, 28 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled3,486,540
Mature posts only73.4% over 27 posts read at least 24h after publication
Subscribers168,031 measured 5 November 2026
Cohortb100000:fas · 1,134 channels · p10 0.793% · p25 1.83% · p50 4.23% · p75 8.77% · p90 17.1%
Position in cohort99.382th percentile · 17.5× the cohort median
Uncertainty±0.174% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding
Post languagePersian · 100.0% of the window’s posts

When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.

This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.

Recorded under the keys clone_source · err_high, last confirmed 11 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

139,390170,401154,895.56 August 20269 November 2026
64 measurements spanning 96 days, net +31,011. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 134,738–175,053 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 64
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Nov 2026, 21:19170,401+949
8 Nov 2026, 15:17169,452+641
7 Nov 2026, 05:57168,811+267
6 Nov 2026, 07:01168,544+513
5 Nov 2026, 09:18168,031+397
4 Nov 2026, 11:56167,634+404
3 Nov 2026, 13:17167,230+340
2 Nov 2026, 09:56166,890+277
1 Nov 2026, 11:30166,613+184
31 Oct 2026, 08:11166,429+264
30 Oct 2026, 08:37166,165+223
29 Oct 2026, 08:28165,942+291
28 Oct 2026, 08:58165,651+303
27 Oct 2026, 09:19165,348+751
26 Oct 2026, 09:44164,597+314
25 Oct 2026, 11:26164,283+310
24 Oct 2026, 14:16163,973-30
23 Oct 2026, 17:00164,003+140
22 Oct 2026, 14:56163,863+254
21 Oct 2026, 06:47163,609first reading

Engagement

116 posts held, back to 13 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 196 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
73.1%
avg views ÷ 170,401 subscribers
Avg views / post
125,000
28 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.016%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
28
of 116 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 November 2026
Posts held116 (13 July 2026 – 10 November 2026)
Views total3,488,550
Reactions total565
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Nov 2026, 03:18 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
151
Videos
13
Links
128

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
6m 01s
Average length
33s

Measured directly from 11 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

3,642 reactions across 115 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 72.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤2,65372.8%
👍3248.90%
🔥3018.26%
💔2536.95%
⚡1113.05%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 116 of the 116 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,742 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 116 most recent posts we hold, published 13 July 2026 to 10 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
47
across the posts below
Posts paid on
31
of 116 we hold a reading for · 27%
Most on one post
4
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @beshcan. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 116 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 13 July 2026 to 10 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 8 of 28 posts held from the last 30 days (28.6%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

10 Nov 2026, 18:59 UTC≈2,320 views12 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

〰️ مراقب باش اپل آیدی‌ات قفل نشه❌ 💢 کسایی که گوشی آیفون دارن باید اینو بدونن که استفاده از VPN اشتباه (آیپی متغییر، رایگان و ... )باعث قفل شدن اپل آیدی‌شون میشه 😎 حتما از فیلترشکن معتبر و آیپی ثابت استفاده کنید 〰️ ✅ یکبار برای همیشه فیلترشکن اختصاصی و آیپی ثابت بگیر👇 برای خرید و تمدید 👇 〰️@BeshcanBot 〰️@BeshcanBot

👍6❤3🔥2💔1

9 Nov 2026, 13:26 UTC≈212,000 views19 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

〰️ تست رایگان ضرر نداره 🥳 قبل از خرید یه تست رایگان بگیر، کیفیت سرویس رو ببین، بعدش تصمیم بگیر 🚀 🔥 یکبار برای همیشه فیلترشکن اختصاصی بگیر👇 برای خرید و تمدید 👇 〰️ @BeshcanBot 〰️ @BeshcanBot

❤9💔5👍3🔥2

8 Nov 2026, 15:15 UTC≈9,130 views32 reactions3 Starsread 11 November 2026
Photo

🏆 کاهش شدید قیمت های بشکن ! 🔥 اگه هنوز خرید نکردی، الان می‌تونی با هزینه کمتر سرویس بگیری ⭐️ ۱۰ گیگ فقط ۸۰ هزار تومان 👑زمان و کاربر نامحدود ⚡️ تحویل فوری و خودکار بعد از پرداخت برای دیدن پلن‌ها و خرید، روی دکمه «خرید سرویس» بزن 👇

❤19⚡7🔥6

7 Nov 2026, 13:54 UTC≈248,000 views28 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

✨ همین الان اشتراک بشکن‌ات رو آپدیت کن تا با این پینگ‌ها سورپرایز بشی 🔥 براتون بهترین سرور‌هارو آوردیم که بتونید با خیال راحت از هر فیلتر و تحریمی که میخوایید رد شید 💎 با یه بِشکن از شر فیلترینگ خلاص شو 🫰 برای خرید و تمدید 👇 〰️ @BeshcanBot 〰️ @BeshcanBot

❤15🔥6⚡5💔2

6 Nov 2026, 17:14 UTC≈10,700 views27 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

〰️ هوش مصنوعی، راحت در دسترس! با سرویس‌های بشکن راحت به ابزارهای هوش مصنوعی وصل شو و برای نوشتن، یادگیری و ایده‌پردازی ازشون کمک بگیر. 🚀 🔐 تست رایگان بگیر و اتصال ابزار هوش مصنوعی موردعلاقه‌ات رو روی اینترنت خودت امتحان کن! 🫰 〰️ @BeshcanBot 〰️ @BeshcanBot

❤19🔥5⚡2👍1

5 Nov 2026, 11:10 UTC≈12,800 views28 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

〰️ میدونستی تو سرویس بشکن زمان و تعداد کاربر نامحدوده؟ هرحجمی میخوای بخر؛ تا زمانی که حجمت تموم نشه برات کار میکنه 😎 با یه بِشکن از شر فیلترینگ خلاص شو 🫰 برای خرید و تمدید 👇 〰️ @BeshcanBot 〰️ @BeshcanBot

❤18⚡5🔥4💔1

4 Nov 2026, 16:12 UTC≈226,000 views18 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Video

〰️ دلت میخواد با همین سرعت بدون یه ثانیه تاخیر اینستاگرام 💬 رو باز کنی؟ اینطوری تو اینستاگرام باید ریلز ببینی 🤌 جز این ریلز دیدن اشتباهه آقااااجوون 📆تاریخ تست: 13 آبان 1405 با یه بِشکن از شر فیلترینگ خلاص شو 🫰 برای خرید و تمدید 👇 〰️ @BeshcanBot 〰️ @BeshcanBot

❤7👍7🔥3💔1

2 Nov 2026, 14:28 UTC≈229,000 views24 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

🎮 گیمری؟ تریدری؟ فریلنسری یا کلا با کامپیوتر کار می‌کنی؟ اینم تست پینگ سرویس حجمی بشکن روی ویندوز با برنامه V2Ray 🔐 همین الان براتون تست گرفتم 😎 خودت تست کن، بعد تصمیم بگیر 🔥 با یه بِشکن از شر فیلترینگ خلاص شو 🫰 برای خرید و تمدید 👇 〰️ @BeshcanBot 〰️ @BeshcanBot

❤13🔥6👍3💔2

1 Nov 2026, 14:45 UTC≈14,400 views12 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

〰️ اسپید تست سرویس بشکن ⚡️ اپراتور تست شده: مخابرات 🛜 📆تاریخ تست: 10 آبان 1405 🚀 تو شرایط قبل از جنگ هم حتی بشکن پرسرعته 🤯 💠یکبار برای همیشه فیلترشکن اختصاصی بگیر👇 برای خرید و تمدید 👇 〰️@BeshcanBot 〰️@BeshcanBot

❤5🔥4💔2👍1

31 Oct 2026, 17:56 UTC≈230,000 views17 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

〰️ تو ساعت پیک مصرف پینگ زیر ۲۰۰ چی میگه؟😎 بشکن همیشه با این پینگا درخدمتتونه 🫰 یه تست رایگان بگیر و خودت ببین 😌 با یه بِشکن از شر فیلترینگ خلاص شو 🫰 برای خرید و تمدید 👇 〰️ @BeshcanBot 〰️ @BeshcanBot

❤17

29 Oct 2026, 15:22 UTC≈13,600 views17 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

〰️ میدونستی با سرویس بشکن میتونی موزیک های اینستاگرام💬 رو بدون دردسر داشته باشی؟ میگی نه؟ همین الان یه تست رایگان بگیر و خودت با چشمای خودت ببین 🥳 با یه بِشکن از شر فیلترینگ خلاص شو 🫰 برای خرید و تمدید 👇 〰️ @BeshcanBot 〰️ @BeshcanBot

❤8👍8🔥1

28 Oct 2026, 17:46 UTC≈12,600 views20 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

〰️ قیمت ها شکسته شد 🤯 از امروز به مدت محدود میتونید بشکن رو با همون کیفیت همیشگی ولی با قیمت پایینتر از قبل داشته باشید 😎 همین الان برو و اون سرویسی که میخواستیو بگیر 🙂‍↔️ برای خرید و تمدید 👇 〰️ @BeshcanBot 〰️ @BeshcanBot

❤11👍3💔3🔥3

Showing the 12 most recent of 116 posts we hold for @beshcan. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts edited after publishing

@beshcan edited 3 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
12 September 2026
Most recent edit
11 November 2026

Mentions

Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“خرید فیلترشکن سرور کانفیگ” (@beshcan), 170,401 subscribers as measured 9 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/beshcan.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.