Channel
> ππ²πΏπΌπΌπ πΊπππΆπ° < | Ψ¨Ψ±ΩΨ² Ω ΫΩΨ²ΫΪ©
@berooz_music_ir
On this record: Topic Β· Growth Β· Engagement Β· Telegram's recommendations Β· Cite this entry
1,758subscribers
-69 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of 1,000β3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001439014204 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @berooz_music_ir |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021 β estimated from Telegramβs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 23 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 26 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 14 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 26 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/berooz_music_ir |
Topic
Music β a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channelβs own recent posts on 23 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a modelβs judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured β it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 26 Sept 2026, 07:00 | 1,758 | -13 |
| 23 Sept 2026, 22:36 | 1,771 | no change |
| 17 Sept 2026, 10:59 | 1,771 | -4 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 12:39 | 1,775 | -5 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 19:37 | 1,780 | -7 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 17:38 | 1,787 | -10 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 17:06 | 1,797 | -4 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 13:08 | 1,801 | -4 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 12:37 | 1,805 | -5 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 11:55 | 1,810 | -5 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 08:22 | 1,815 | -2 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 16:46 | 1,817 | -7 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 23:54 | 1,824 | -3 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 16:58 | 1,827 | first reading |
Engagement
Posts not read yet. This entry is on the register from its profile alone; the post reader has not reached it. Engagement figures appear here once posts have actually been measured β we do not publish a rate before we have the readings behind it.
Appears in Telegramβs recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly β each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone elseβs query is independent of having been queried itself.
@musicname10 Β· 120,868
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 81 here β alongside 80 others β read 15 August 2026
@bookk_lovers Β· 27,462
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 64 here β alongside 63 others β read 11 September 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegramβs list for THAT channel, not this one β see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 β this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
β> ππ²πΏπΌπΌπ πΊπππΆπ° < | Ψ¨Ψ±ΩΨ² Ω ΫΩΨ²ΫΪ©β (@berooz_music_ir), 1,758 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/berooz_music_ir.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.