Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Бермуды | Про искусство

Channel

Бермуды | Про искусство

@bermoods_live

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2,090subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001554384703
TypeChannel
Username@bermoods_live
Created25 February 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 September 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 16 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/bermoods_live

Topic

Art & design — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

2,0882,0932,090.57 August 2026 — 2,089 subscribers8 August 2026 — 2,091 subscribers10 August 2026 — 2,090 subscribers14 August 2026 — 2,093 subscribers17 August 2026 — 2,091 subscribers20 August 2026 — 2,092 subscribers24 August 2026 — 2,090 subscribers27 August 2026 — 2,091 subscribers30 August 2026 — 2,089 subscribers2 September 2026 — 2,088 subscribers12 September 2026 — 2,090 subscribers2,0907 August 202612 September 2026
11 measurements spanning 36 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,087–2,094 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Sept 2026, 05:592,090+2
2 Sept 2026, 15:572,088-1
30 Aug 2026, 05:562,089-2
27 Aug 2026, 09:032,091+1
24 Aug 2026, 17:192,090-2
20 Aug 2026, 20:252,092+1
17 Aug 2026, 13:042,091-2
14 Aug 2026, 05:162,093+3
10 Aug 2026, 15:372,090-1
8 Aug 2026, 01:102,091+2
7 Aug 2026, 16:022,089first reading

Engagement

6 posts held, back to 10 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 6 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

111 reactions across 6 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤3531.5%
❤‍🔥2724.3%
👍2320.7%
custom 528755128912578668865.41%
🙈65.41%
😁54.50%
😍54.50%
😢43.60%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 6 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 111 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 6 most recent posts we hold, published 10 July 2026 to 23 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

23 Jul 2026, 05:09 UTC197 views20 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Спасибо всем за ответы! На самом деле, на картине Ивана Шишкина «Рожь» нет… зайца 🐇 А вот люди и ласточки есть! ➡️ два путника Люди встречаются на работах художника крайне редко. Как правило, фигуры призваны подчеркнуть масштаб природного вида ➡️ две ласточки Птицы летят очень низко, прямо над дорогой — так бывает перед дождём. На скорую грозу намекает и тёмное небо на горизонте в правой части картины. Если не…

❤‍🔥12😍5👍3

22 Jul 2026, 13:55 UTC199 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Posted without readable text

👍4custom 52875512891257866883❤2

17 Jul 2026, 15:13 UTC309 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Вы правильно писали в комментариях — речь о белоснежном платке или бумажном листе в левом нижнем углу картины! 😳 Рассказываем в карточках о том, чем он необычен и как его трактуют искусствоведы. Как всегда, будем рады прочитать ваши версии! И оставьте реакций, если вам нравятся наши угадайки о деталях в искусстве ❤️

❤11👍5❤‍🔥1

15 Jul 2026, 12:16 UTC272 views29 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Спасибо всем за внимательность! Мы насчитали как минимум три детали, которые могут вызвать вопросы и удивить. ⬆️ В карточках — разбор двух странных деталей, которые не бросаются в глаза, но отличают этот портрет от многих подобных. А вот о третьей — которая ставит исследователей в тупик до сих пор — расскажем в отдельном посте завтра. Уже догадались, о чём речь?)

❤15👍11custom 52875512891257866883

10 Jul 2026, 05:58 UTC294 views29 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Вот так выглядел хейт XIX века 🤔Почему современники так жёстко высказывались о картинах импрессионистов — казалось бы, таких безобидных и мирных? 🤔Почему то, что сегодня кажется нам красивым и понятным, вызывало ярость и ужас у зрителей XIX века? ➡️Поговорим об этом уже завтра на онлайн лекции Марии Герай. Встречаемся в зуме 11 июля в 12:00 (мск). Это будет лекция, после которой вы посмотрите не только на искусст…

❤‍🔥14🙈6😁5😢4

Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @bermoods_live. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Бермуды | Про искусство” (@bermoods_live), 2,090 subscribers as measured 12 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bermoods_live.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.