Channel
@berkanscalls
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,679subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 5 October 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002094784595 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @berkanscalls |
| Description | high conviction @berkan for top1% enquiries |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 5 October 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 5 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/berkanscalls |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Oct 2026, 12:22 | 1,679 | no change |
| 5 Oct 2026, 11:47 | 1,679 | first reading |
13 posts held, back to 20 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 5 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
31 reactions across 12 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 67.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 21 | 67.7% | |
| 💯 | 4 | 12.9% | |
| ⚡ | 3 | 9.68% | |
| ❤🔥 | 1 | 3.23% | |
| 👨💻 | 1 | 3.23% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 3.23% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 31 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 20 August 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @berkanscalls. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 13 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 20 August 2026 to 28 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Remember niggas - To ape ANY COIN on ANY CHAIN, with USDC Fucking game changer The simplest telegram bot we all use, sell limits always trigger and fills are really good https://t.me/cove_trading_bot?start=ref_berkan
❤1🥰1
Berkan’s Alfa pinned «https://youtu.be/ijRZeHviqr0?is=PCk42An3w5Yv4ZTw I made a 20 minute video breaking it down btw»
250x with nothing but conviction.
❤3
https://youtu.be/ijRZeHviqr0?is=PCk42An3w5Yv4ZTw I made a 20 minute video breaking it down btw
❤2👨💻1
Look at ansem’s narrative The FACE OF SOLANA, with more motion than WHITE WHALE he comes through endorsing a coin which we knew he’d do btw Of course it sends to 400m Study conviction. This game is easy when you ONLY APE obvious plays
❤2❤🔥1
Like jimothy, EVEYRONE related to that majestic Chad Coz it’s a disabled racoon Chad
❤2💯1
It doesn’t even matter if that ballerina was GIGA VIRAL who’s it getting VIEWED BY? Little girls on their iPads?
💯1
They can’t, nor can anyone in crypto
❤2
Good traders are chads, how can chads relate to these gay faggot memes?
💯1
When that ballerina faggot coin came out I knew it would go to zero And I blocked everyone who promoted that faggotry
❤3
Rule one is to avoid ALL gay memes
⚡1❤1
Labubu on the other hand was actually a chad toy, relatable to many, and people ACTUALLY bought the toy
❤2💯1
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @berkanscalls. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Berkan’s Alfa” (@berkanscalls), 1,679 subscribers as measured 5 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/berkanscalls.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.