❗️❗️❗️SCAM❗️❗️❗️ NAME: Arbitrage X STATUS: ⛔️ SCAM LINK: @arbxbot START DATE: 30.10.2019 PAYMENTS ACCEPT: BTC PAYOUTS: 5% per day for 30 days WITHDRAWAL: Instant MIN DEPOSIT: 0.002 BTC MIN WITHDRAWAL: 0.002 BTC REFERRAL: 10% 💰 berichwith.me 🤖 bot.berichwith.me 📢 channel.berichwith.me

Channel
NEWS BERICHWITH.ME
@berichwithme_news
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
53subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001076599891 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @berichwithme_news |
| Created | 27 October 2016 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset) |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 13 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/berichwithme_news |
Topic
Marketing & affiliate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 3 October 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 51% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 3 Oct 2026, 02:37 | 53 | -1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 09:15 | 54 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 20:23 | 54 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 23 September 2017 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 December 2019. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Recent posts
❗️❗️❗️SCAM❗️❗️❗️ NAME: DOUBL3R STATUS: ⛔️ SCAM LINK: doubl3r.com START DATE: 09.10.2019 PAYMENTS ACCEPT: Bitcoin (BTC) PAYOUTS: 200% after 100 hours WITHDRAWAL: Automatic MIN DEPOSIT: 0.001 BTC MAX DEPOSIT: 100 BTC REFERRAL BONUS: 10% 💰 berichwith.me 🤖 bot.berichwith.me 📢 channel.berichwith.me
❗️❗️❗️ SCAM ❗️❗️❗️ NAME: RECA-Invest Limited STATUS: ⛔️ SCAM LINK: @RECAinvest_bot START DATE: 19.09.2019 PAYMENTS ACCEPT: BTC / ETH / LTC / XRP / BCH / TRX / DOGE / DASH / PAYOUTS: 1.0% - 2.5% daily for 90 Days. TOTAL ROI >150% WITHDRAWAL: AUTO MIN DEPOSIT: from 0.01XRP MAX DEPOSIT: Unlimited REFERRAL BONUS: 🤝 Referral Bonus in 3 Levels: 🥇 Level 10% 🥈 Level 3% 🥉 Level 1% 🏅 Level 1% 💰 berichwith.me 🤖 bot.ber…
❗️❗️❗️SCAM❗️❗️❗️ NAME: Six Earning STATUS: ⛔️SCAM Link: @sixearning_bot START DATE: 27.12.2018 PAYMENTS ACCEPT: BTC, LTC, ETH, BCH, DASH, XRP PAYOUTS: 3% daily for 50days WITHDRAWAL: Instant MIN DEPOSIT/REINVEST/WITHDRAWAL: 0.003 BTC | 0.1 LTC | 0.1 ETH | 0.05 BCH | 0.1 DASH | 15 XRP REFERRAL: 5-3-1% 💰 berichwith.me 🤖 bot.berichwith.me 📢 channel.berichwith.me
How did you like the privacy-focused update of Telegram?
- Awesome, keep it up! 👍56%
- Awful, take it back 👎44%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❗️❗️❗️SCAM❗️❗️❗️ NAME: InfinityX STATUS: ⛔️ SCAM LINK: @InfinityXMR_bot START DATE: 01.04.2018 PAYMENTS ACCEPT: ETC, XRP, XMR, DOGE, *BTC PAYOUTS: 1.2% Daily for 120 Days, 144% Total WITHDRAWAL: Instant MIN DEPOSIT: Varies: ~$10 MAX DEPOSIT: No Limit REFERRAL BONUS: 10%, Unique Infinity Plan 💰 berichwith.me 🤖 bot.berichwith.me 📢 channel.berichwith.me
❗❗❗SCAM❗❗❗ NAME: Splitt STATUS: ⛔ SCAM LINK: splitt.co START DATE: 23.06.2018 PAYMENTS ACCEPT: BTC, PM, ADVCash, Aragon, BCH, Bancor, Blackcoin, Civic, Dogecoin, ETH, ETC, Golem, Matchpool, Komodo, LBRY, LTC and more.. PAYOUTS: 2.64% for 60 days 3.50% for 40 days 4.70% for 35 days WITHDRAWAL: Instant MIN DEPOSIT: 0.001 BTC REFERRAL: 4-2-1% 💰 berichwith.me 🤖 bot.berichwith.me 📢 channel.berichwith.me
❗️❗️❗️ SCAM❗️❗️❗️ NAME: ArbiRobot STATUS: ⛔️ SCAM LINK: @arbirobot START DATE: 15.10.2018 PAYMENTS ACCEPT: BTC PAYOUTS: 5% Daily for 30 Days, 150% Total WITHDRAWAL: Instant MIN DEPOSIT: Varies: 0.01 BTC PARTNERS BONUS: 5% 💰 berichwith.me 🤖 bot.berichwith.me 📢 channel.berichwith.me
❗️❗️❗️ SCAM❗️❗️❗️ NAME: Bitlazinto STATUS: ⛔️ SCAM LINK: Bitlazinto.org START DATE: 16.09.2018 PAYMENTS ACCEPT: Bitcoin PAYOUTS: 115% in 3 days WITHDRAWAL: Instant MIN DEPOSIT: $30 MAX DEPOSIT: $20000 REFERRAL BONUS: 10% 💰 berichwith.me 🤖 bot.berichwith.me 📢 channel.berichwith.me
❗️❗️❗️ SCAM❗️❗️❗️ NAME: CMPinvestor STATUS: ⛔️ SCAM LINK: cmpinvestor.com START DATE: 01.09.2018 PAYMENTS ACCEPT: BTC, PM, Payeer, Coinpaments, Godecoin, Leth... PAYOUTS: Daily for 5 - 90 Days, 3 - 30% daily WITHDRAWAL: Instant MIN DEPOSIT: $10 MAX DEPOSIT: unlim REFERRAL BONUS: 8% + 50$ for every 10 investors 💰 berichwith.me 🤖 bot.berichwith.me 📢 channel.berichwith.me
❗️❗️❗️ SCAM❗️❗️❗️ NAME: CryptoBooster STATUS: ⛔️ SCAM LINK: cryptobooster.club START DATE: 25-07-18 PAYMENTS ACCEPT: PM, BTC, ETH, LTC, BCH PAYOUTS: 1.9% - 5.5% daily WITHDRAWAL: Instant MIN DEPOSIT: $25 MAX DEPOSIT: $25000 REFERRAL BONUS: 10 level with 7% 2% 1% 0.5% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 💰 berichwith.me 🤖 bot.berichwith.me 📢 channel.berichwith.me
❗️❗️❗️ SCAM ❗️❗️❗️ NAME: GoldCryptoBTC STATUS: ⛔️ SCAM LINK: @goldcryptobtc_bot START: 7/31/2018 PAYMENTS ACCEPT: BTC PAYOUTS: 5-7% Daily forever 5% 0.003 BTC - 0.499 BTC 6% 0.5 BTC - 0.999 BTC 7% 1 BTC - 5 BTC WITHDRAWAL: Instant MIN DEPOSIT: 0.003 BTC MIN WITHD: 0.0025 BTC REFERRAL BONUS: 5-3-2-1-0.5% 💰 berichwith.me 🤖 bot.berichwith.me 📢 channel.berichwith.me
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @berichwithme_news. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
How did you like the privacy-focused update of Telegram?
- Awesome, keep it up! 👍56%
- Awful, take it back 👎44%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 23 September 2017 to 4 December 2019. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 4
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 4
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@berichwithme_news named 4 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 7 posts, 11 August 2026 – 11 August 2026
named in 1 post, 11 August 2026 – 11 August 2026
named in 1 post, 11 August 2026 – 11 August 2026
named in 1 post, 11 August 2026 – 11 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“NEWS BERICHWITH.ME” (@berichwithme_news), 53 subscribers as measured 3 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/berichwithme_news.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.