Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for قَبَسٌ مِنَ الهُـدَى

Channel

قَبَسٌ مِنَ الهُـدَى

@beougwb

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

13subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 29 September 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002172839700
TypeChannel
Username@beougwb
Description(زكاة العلم نشره) قد مكنّي الله بفضله من بعض العلوم الشرعية، فأنشأت هذه القناة لتبسيط العلوم الشرعية ونشرها نظرًا للجهل الحاصل في الدين، سائلةً الله جلّ جلاله الإخلاص والقبول وسهولة الفهم والوصول. إن أصبت فمن الله وإن أخطأت فمن نفسي والشيطان. -الـجُـوري
Created17 August 2024 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded29 September 2026
Last confirmed live29 September 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/beougwb

Growth

1329 Sept 2026, 12:47 — 13 subscribers29 Sept 2026, 13:22 — 13 subscribers29 Sept 2026, 12:4729 Sept 2026, 13:22
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12–14 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
29 Sept 2026, 13:2213no change
29 Sept 2026, 12:4713first reading

Engagement

11 posts held, back to 17 August 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
115.4%
avg views ÷ 13 subscribers
Avg views / post
15.0
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
4
of 11 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 September 2026
Posts held11 (17 August 2024 – 24 September 2026)
Views total45
Reactions total—
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken29 Sept 2026, 13:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

2 reactions across 1 post, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👏2100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 17 August 2024 to 24 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

24 Sept 2026, 02:45 UTC12 viewsread 29 September 2026

إذا نزل بالعبد بلاء، ثم دعا الله سبحانه وتعالى، فالدعاء مع البلاء له أحوال ثلاثة: الحال الأولى: أن يكون الدعاء أقوى من البلاء، فيدفعه الله سبحانه وتعالى عن عبده، فيكون الدعاء سببًا في رفع البلاء قبل وقوعه أو دفعه بعد نزوله. الحال الثانية: أن يكون البلاء أقوى، ويكون الدعاء أخف منه، فلا يرفعه بالكلية، ولكن يخفف الله به عن العبد من أثر البلاء وشدته بقدر ما شاء سبحانه. الحال الثالثة: أن يتقارب البلاء والدعاء في القوة،…

19 Sept 2024, 04:37 UTC143 viewsread 29 September 2026

فوالله ثم والله إن من الكفر بالنعم أن ينعم الله عليك بوطن آمن مستقر تتنعم فيه وترغد فتقابل نعمة الله بالإحتفال الفاجر الخليع وبالمجاهرة والأغاني والبدع الباطلة وتنسى فضل الله عليك وعلى آباءك وأجدادك الممتد لأعوام مديدة ! ألا تخشى زوال هذه النعم بكفرك بها؟! وإن من أكثر أسباب زوال النعم الكفر بها واستعمالها في المعاصي، أضعف الإيمان أنكر ما ترى بقلبك لعل الله لا يسخط علينا ويعاقبنا بفعل السفهاء منا.

30 Aug 2024, 14:34 UTC191 views2 reactionsread 29 September 2026

ناقشتُ دكتورة العقيدة (أمل الغفيلي) في جامعة الإمام عمّن تحتجُ على صحة علوم الطاقة ،وتستدل بأحاديث مثل: (أنا عند ظن عبدي بي) على قانون الجذب و آية (وبالنجم هم يهتدون) على جواز الأبراج، وتقول هي علومٌ تؤخذ من الكفار كعلوم الرياضيات والأحياء فآخذ منها ما يوافق عقيدتي وأترك ما يخافها فكان رد الدكتورة على هذا الكلام: شتان بين العلوم الزائفة التي لا يمكن خضوعها للتجارب المادية وبين العلوم التجربية وشتان ما بين الحاجة للع…

👏2

17 Aug 2024, 23:41 UTC61 viewsread 29 September 2026

السلام عليكم ورحمة الله وبركاته وصف القناة يشرح محتواها ولعلّي أفرغ بعض ما قالوه معلماتي في العلوم الشرعية وأسجل صوتيات أشرح بها بعض الأمور، وإنما أنا بشر مثلكم، لا أزكي نفسي ولست أفضل حالًا من أحدكم ولكن لعل الله اختارني لتزكية علمي. إن اخطأت فانصحوني وارشدوني ووجهوني فأنا أختٌ لكم.. وسأنقل تسجيلات قناة (وذكر فإن الذكرى تنفع المؤمنين) لهذه القناة مع عناوينها بحول الله تعالى وقوته، وأرجو منكم فضلا نشرها لنتشارك الأج…

17 Aug 2024, 20:58 UTCviews —

Channel name was changed to «تَبْسِيطُ الْعُلُومِ إلَىٰ خَيْرِ الْعُمُومِ.»

Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @beougwb. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“قَبَسٌ مِنَ الهُـدَى” (@beougwb), 13 subscribers as measured 29 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/beougwb.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.