Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Побег из Бенгази

Channel

Побег из Бенгази

@bengazi_exit

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,893subscribers

-5 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001467550880
TypeChannel
Username@bengazi_exit
Created20 April 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/bengazi_exit

Growth

1,8931,8981,895.56 August 2026 — 1,898 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,898 subscribers9 August 2026 — 1,897 subscribers16 August 2026 — 1,893 subscribers6 August 202616 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 10 days, net -5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,892–1,899 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 05:061,893-4
9 Aug 2026, 15:151,897-1
6 Aug 2026, 06:361,898no change
6 Aug 2026, 03:171,898first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 9 December 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
46.3%
avg views ÷ 1,893 subscribers
Avg views / post
877
1 post measured
Reaction rate
9.01%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 19 July 2026
Posts held18 (9 December 202419 July 2026)
Views total877
Reactions total79
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 17:21 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
6m 22s
Average length
1m 36s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,588 reactions across 18 posts, in 32 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍58436.8%
🔥20412.8%
💯18511.6%
17010.7%
😁905.67%
😢613.84%
🙏493.09%
👏311.95%
🫡291.83%
🥰241.51%
💩231.45%
🤔211.32%
🕊201.26%
👎150.945%
😱150.945%
❤‍🔥140.882%
130.819%
😐90.567%
🖕70.441%
🤡50.315%
12 further kinds191.20%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,588reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 9 December 2024 to 19 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

19 Jul 2026, 12:05 UTC877 views79 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Убийство Сейфа. Кому выгодно? С большой задержкой, но как и обещал, даю расклад по подлому убийству верного сына ливийского народа - Сейф аль-Ислама Каддафи. За это время я начитался очень много откровенной хуйни, поэтому настала пора высказать свои дилетантские мысли. Основная версия всех и вся - убийство Сейфа иностранным государством - Францией, Великобританией, США и так далее. На вопрос, почему именно сейчас и

💯24🕊20😢14🔥9👍84

3 Feb 2026, 18:17 UTC≈3,580 views57 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🇱🇾 Официальные СМИ со ссылкой на советника Сейф аль-Ислама Каддафи Абдаллы Усмана подтверждают гибель сына Каддафи.. Все таки Хафтар добрался до него.. Почему Хафтар? Скоро подробно изложу @bengazi_exit

😢29😱11🫡632👍1👎1🔥1

3 Feb 2026, 18:04 UTC≈2,670 views23 reactionsread 7 August 2026

🇱🇾⚡️ Сын Каддафи убит в аз-Зинтане. Информация пока что известна только из местных источников, подтверждается его советником. Ранее племена аз-Зинтана резко выступили против Сейфа и потребовали от него убираться из города UPD: пока эту информацию крутят местные источники, но не фуфловые, поэтому смотрим, что дальше. Я очень надеюсь, что это все таки вброс UPD: не вброс.. Сейф мертв... @bengazi_exit

🤔13😢9👏1

25 Nov 2025, 13:27 UTC≈4,360 views78 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

🇱🇾 Дорогами востока Ливии @bengazi_exit

🔥38👍23❤‍🔥14🫡3

7 Nov 2025, 09:08 UTC≈10,800 views244 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Трудности перевода Есть один момент, с которым рано или поздно, и хотя бы раз за всю историю своих командировок в регионе БВ и СА сталкивается переводчик - это обесценивание его работы. Дело в том, что не такое уж и большое количество специалистов на дальних рубежах понимают, что такое арабский язык, и что может случиться, если переводяга будет слушать "мудрые" советы "бывалых" спецов и беспрекословно делать, как он

👍125💯6333🔥9😁5👏4🤔2🥱2

29 Jul 2025, 09:32 UTC≈4,620 views46 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Много рассказал про визы и мувафаку, но ничего не показал. Исправляюсь. На первом фото - мувафака амния, то самое разрешение на въезд на территорию Ливии, подконтрольную армии Хафтара. В ней указывается ФИО, номер документа, гражданство, откуда вы прибываете и какой авиакомпанией. Стоит отметить, что на данный момент эта мувафака не гарантирует вам свободный заход, как ранее. На втором фото - официальная ливийская

👍29🔥85😁2😢2

18 Jun 2025, 07:40 UTC≈5,750 views56 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Отмена въездных виз в Ливию для граждан Беларуси Недавно картонное правительство востока Ливии объявило официальным указом, что отныне граждане Беларуси освобождаются от въездных виз в Ливию. Хотел бы пояснить, что это такое и с чем это переваривать. Во первых, это освобождение не от виз, а от так называемой "мувафака амния", что-то типа разрешения на въезд, выдаваемым военно-инвестиционным управлением ЛНА. Стоит т

2511👍9😁5🤡4🤔1🙏1

15 Apr 2025, 15:19 UTC≈7,770 views121 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Вдогонку к предыдущему посту. На видео запечатлен эпичный махач представителей двух великих арабских народов, с богатыми религиозными традициями и устоем. А именно, ливийский дипломат наебашился в дрова в Тунисе и решил подкатить к местным женщинам с низкой социальной ответственностью. То-ли о цене не договорились, то-ли ливиец посчитал, что туниски должны считать за честь дать ему бесплатно, история умалчивает, но п

💯53😁2118👍12🔥9🤔3👎2💩2

30 Mar 2025, 10:12 UTC≈42,300 views268 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Недавний визит Юнусбека Баматгиреевича и его появление на пятничной молитве в одной из мечетей города Бенгази вызвало в некоторых кругах идею, мол, а ведь будет круто, если решать серьезные вопросы в этих странах станут военные или гражданские специалисты - мусульмане. Это же даст такое колоссальное преимущество в общении и вообще, во взаимопонимании. Ну что-ж, начну я вас, дорогие мои, снова разочаровывать и разве

👍152🔥53👏26💯17😁86🍾2🤨2

27 Feb 2025, 09:29 UTC≈8,310 views89 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Единственное, что можно посоветовать деду, который немного учился в СССР, вспомнить смысл поговорки "и рыбку съесть и на хуй не сесть". Каддафи вон, тоже любил ебалом отсвечивать в Париже. В результате ничего особенного не съел, но зато сел так сел @bengazi_exit

🔥32💯28👍17👎7😁5

26 Feb 2025, 17:42 UTC≈7,760 views38 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Старый приехал в Париж на встречу с Эмманюэлем Макроном Никак не ожидал, что дед отправится во Францию, в сам Елисейский дворец и встретится там с Макроном. Кто не понял, дед это главнокомандующий Ливийской национальной армией Халифа Хафтар. @bengazi_exit

👍25💩121

19 Feb 2025, 07:53 UTC≈7,480 views76 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🇱🇾 Привет, дорогие мои подписчики! Скоро вернусь к вам, пока слишком занят котиками Бенгази. Всех надо накормить, погладить, за ушком почесать 😻 @bengazi_exit

🔥39🥰22👍15

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @bengazi_exit. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 393,305 of 1,548,671entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Побег из Бенгази” (@bengazi_exit), 1,893 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bengazi_exit.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.