Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for BeMine | Analytics&Announcements

Channel

BeMine | Analytics&Announcements

@bemineanalytics

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Cite this entry

20,217subscribers

-1,014 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001671546546
TypeChannel
Username@bemineanalytics
Description🌐 Website: bemine.club 💬 Chat: @bemineclubchat 📨 Support: https://cloud.bemine.club/support/ Official TG Account: https://t.me/bemineclub Your favorite mining company brings its thoughts on #CRYPTO/#STOCKS/#INDEXES
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live21 August 2026
Measurements held15
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 21 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/bemineanalytics

Growth

20,21721,23120,7247 August 2026 — 21,231 subscribers7 August 2026 — 21,231 subscribers8 August 2026 — 21,173 subscribers9 August 2026 — 21,121 subscribers10 August 2026 — 20,943 subscribers11 August 2026 — 20,919 subscribers12 August 2026 — 20,868 subscribers13 August 2026 — 20,758 subscribers14 August 2026 — 20,659 subscribers16 August 2026 — 20,512 subscribers17 August 2026 — 20,391 subscribers18 August 2026 — 20,333 subscribers19 August 2026 — 20,317 subscribers20 August 2026 — 20,280 subscribers21 August 2026 — 20,217 subscribers7 August 202621 August 2026
15 measurements spanning 14 days, net -1,014. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 20,065–21,383 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
21 Aug 2026, 23:5620,217-63
20 Aug 2026, 18:3520,280-37
19 Aug 2026, 19:0820,317-16
18 Aug 2026, 15:3620,333-58
17 Aug 2026, 15:5420,391-121
16 Aug 2026, 08:0820,512-147
14 Aug 2026, 15:4720,659-99
13 Aug 2026, 03:5620,758-110
12 Aug 2026, 03:5220,868-51
11 Aug 2026, 06:5820,919-24
10 Aug 2026, 08:4520,943-178
9 Aug 2026, 10:5121,121-52
8 Aug 2026, 11:1021,173-58
7 Aug 2026, 20:3021,231no change
7 Aug 2026, 20:2321,231first reading

Engagement

28 posts held, back to 4 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 34 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
1.35%
avg views ÷ 20,217 subscribers
Avg views / post
273
15 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.62%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
15
of 28 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 9 of 15 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 August 2026
Posts held28 (4 July 202621 August 2026)
Views total4,101
Reactions total48
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken23 Aug 2026, 09:36 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
262
Videos
6
Links
247

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 23 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

99 reactions across 19 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
4141.4%
👍3434.3%
🔥1515.2%
33.03%
👌22.02%
🏆11.01%
👀11.01%
👏11.01%
🤣11.01%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 28 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 99reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 28 most recent posts we hold, published 4 July 2026 to 21 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 28 we hold a reading for · 4%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @bemineanalytics. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 28 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 July 2026 to 21 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

20 Aug 2026, 15:02 UTC134 views4 reactionsread 23 August 2026
Photo

📊 One spec decides whether a miner is worth owning. It isn't hashrate. Every terahash of Bitcoin hashrate earns the same. What separates two SHA-256 machines is the watts they burn to produce it. That ratio is J/TH. ⏳ Why it ages Difficulty trends up, so the same terahash mines fewer coins over time. The watts don't move. The lower your J/TH, the longer that math works. 🔎 Your own number My Farm shows your share's

2🏆1👍1

15 Aug 2026, 09:03 UTC273 views7 reactionsread 23 August 2026
Photo

💬 Eight years. 500+ reviews. Some of the miners behind them have been with us through two bear markets and every difficulty adjustment since. Not every review is a good one. Every one gets an answer. ⛏️ Whatever anyone writes, your own numbers are in My Farm.

👍42🔥1

11 Aug 2026, 13:20 UTC352 views7 reactionsread 23 August 2026
Photo

🛠 Offline doesn't mean broken Three reasons a machine goes quiet, and only one of them is a Warranty case. 🔧 Scheduled maintenance Every 3 months from purchase, up to 48 hours. $20 on a whole unit, $2 on a 10/100 share. Routine service, nothing to do. ⚠️ A worn part An ASIC runs flat out around the clock, so hashboards, control boards and fans wear out. Under Warranty repair starts without you, back online in up t

4👍21

5 Aug 2026, 14:03 UTC420 views4 reactionsread 23 August 2026
Photo

📉 Difficulty is down year over year for only the second time ever The first was 2021, when China banned mining. Today it sits about 19% below its November peak. Fewer machines are competing for the same block. The same share mines in a less crowded network today than it did in November. 📦 Shares in an S21 start at $123 → Shop 💬 Share what your miners show in the comments.

2👍1🔥1

3 Aug 2026, 04:01 UTC340 views4 reactionsread 23 August 2026
Photo

🗓️ 15 drops left this season Something lands on your Summer Track every other day, and all the dates are already set: 📈 Progressive discount — 3, 15, 21 🪙 PAWĀ — 9, 17, 27 💸 BTC promo credit — 7, 13, 19, 29 ⚡️ 5% cashback — 11, 23, 31 ⛏️ Trial miner — 5, 25 One $50+ top-up opens the track for the rest of the season. The final drop is August 31 — the same day everything closes. 💸 Top up 🔗 Season page 🔖 Save it s

2👍1🔥1

1 Aug 2026, 19:58 UTC345 views1 reactionsread 23 August 2026
Photo

WARNING SCAM ALERT We can see alot of customers reporting of a BeMine clone bmbmine.com We have nothing to do with this domain. BeMine only provides its services via bemine.club and cloud.bemine.club Every other domains should be a fishing or a total SCAM. Please be aware of the link you’re using to enter BeMine

1

Showing the 12 most recent of 28 posts we hold for @bemineanalytics. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 21 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“BeMine | Analytics&Announcements” (@bemineanalytics), 20,217 subscribers as measured 21 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bemineanalytics.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.