Channel
@beltp_by
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry
182subscribers
-7 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001978887700 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @beltp_by |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 6 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/beltp_by |
Automotive — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 24 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 75% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Oct 2026, 00:01 | 182 | -1 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 02:02 | 183 | -2 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 13:36 | 185 | -2 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 01:38 | 187 | -1 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 04:04 | 188 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 12:03 | 189 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 20:23 | 189 | first reading |
5 posts held, back to 11 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 5 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
30 reactions across 5 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 17 | 56.7% | |
| ❤ | 10 | 33.3% | |
| ⚡ | 1 | 3.33% | |
| 🍾 | 1 | 3.33% | |
| 👨💻 | 1 | 3.33% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 5 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 30 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 5 most recent posts we hold, published 11 June 2026 to 29 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Кажется, это самый компактный SANY, который мы когда-либо фотографировали. 😄 Детализация настолько хорошая, что с первого взгляда можно и не понять - перед вами модель или настоящий экскаватор. Иногда самые маленькие экспонаты запоминаются ничуть не меньше самых больших.
❤4👍2
Когда работаешь с перегружателями каждый день, легко забыть, насколько впечатляюще это выглядит со стороны. Гомель, конкурс «Лучший по профессии», десятки участников и много мастерства за рычагами. Собрали для вас немного атмосферы этих соревнований 🎥
👍3❤1
Если для кого-то перегружатель - редкая техника, то на конкурсе «Лучший по профессии» в Гомеле их было столько, что можно было проводить отдельную перепись 🙂 Недавно побывали на ежегодном мероприятии ГО «Белвтормет», посмотрели на работу профессионалов и поймали атмосферу события. Фотографий получилось много, но самое интересное всё же оставили для видео - покажем его немного позже 🎥
👍4❤1👨💻1
Из-за насыщенного мая и июня мы чуть не забыли ещё про одну большую поездку. 🙂 В конце месяца успели побывать на СТТ-2026 в Москве. Несколько дней среди сотен единиц техники, новинок отрасли и встреч с коллегами. Фотографий получилось столько, что выбрать несколько было непросто, но всё же собрали небольшую подборку. 📸 Делимся атмосферой выставки.
👍5❤1🍾1
БелАГРО-2026 официально завершилась. Теперь можно спокойно разобрать сотни фотографий, выпить кофе без спешки и вспомнить, сколько людей за эти дни спрашивали: «А можно внутрь кабины?» Спасибо всем, кто был с нами на выставке. До новых встреч - на объектах, в офисе и, конечно, на следующих выставках. 🚜
❤3👍3⚡1
Showing the 5 most recent of 5 posts we hold for @beltp_by. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“БЕЛТЕХНИКПАРТНЁР” (@beltp_by), 182 subscribers as measured 6 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/beltp_by.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.