С праздником, дорогие Защитники❤️
❤16👍5👎1

Channel
@belozerova_elena
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,035subscribers
-5 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001718544548 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @belozerova_elena |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/belozerova_elena |
Local community — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 93% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Sept 2026, 13:15 | 1,035 | -1 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 11:36 | 1,036 | -1 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 21:20 | 1,037 | -1 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 11:25 | 1,038 | -1 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 06:07 | 1,039 | -1 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 00:14 | 1,040 | +1 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 19:48 | 1,039 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:47 | 1,040 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:33 | 1,040 | first reading |
13 posts held, back to 12 April 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
414 reactions across 13 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 171 | 41.3% | |
| ❤ | 82 | 19.8% | |
| 🙏 | 73 | 17.6% | |
| 🤬 | 63 | 15.2% | |
| 🤔 | 9 | 2.17% | |
| 😭 | 5 | 1.21% | |
| 💯 | 4 | 0.966% | |
| 👎 | 3 | 0.725% | |
| 🤝 | 3 | 0.725% | |
| 💔 | 1 | 0.242% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 414 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 12 April 2025 to 23 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
С праздником, дорогие Защитники❤️
❤16👍5👎1
Друзья, как вы наверное уже все знаете, один из информационных каналов нашего района - "Испанские кварталы", без объяснения причин заблокировал Телеграм. Этот канал вел наш местный районный активист Никита (Грин), который знаком всем по озеленению района. Разумеется Никита подал апелляцию руководству Телеграм, но пока идёт выяснение причин, он создал альтернативный канал, который будет точно так же освещать новости н…
👍11
Общие собрания собственников, которые проходили в домах: Сервантеса, д. 1 к. 1 , д. 1 кор.2 , д.1 кор.3 д. 1 кор. 4 завершены. Кворум отсутствует🤷♀ Продолжаем жить, как жили и надеемся, что ничего не поменяется в худшую сторону. По остальным домам информация будет известна после подсчёта бланков голосования.
🤝3
Надежда слабая, но должна же быть когда-то последняя капля...
👍36🙏22💯4
22.06.1941
🙏21😭5💔1
Из ответа Префектуры касательно замены хорошей плитки на асфальт, мы с удивлением узнаем, что данные работы проходят " с учётом пожеланий жителей и согласованы Советом депутатов". На втором скрине самоотверженная "борьба" одного из согласовавших все это, но , то ли не понявшего, за что руку тянул, то ли подмахнувшего не глядя. Собственно, на этом все...
🤬63
Славься, страна! Мы гордимся тобой! 🤍💙❤️
❤33👍5👎2
Судя по всему, никто и не думал прекращать вандальные работы… Происходит прямо сейчас… Что это такое вообще? Ужас какой то кладут. По всей улице Сервантеса. Вот телеграм каналы Управы https://t.me/uprava_kommunarka И Префектуры - https://t.me/tinao_mos Нужно написать обращения в Правительство Москвы, Префектуру (также через портал Правительства), Управу ([email protected], укажите ФИО заявителя в письме),…
👍16❤2
🏗 Москомархитектура прислала ответ по Light Industrial в "Испанских кварталах". Что мы из его можем узнать? - участок частично вошел в ППТ дороги от Калужского шоссе до Саларьевской улицы, но "Планировочными решениями не предусмотрено мероприятий в отношении рассматриваемого земельного участка". - МКА разрабатывает проект планировки отдельно на ИК-2 (картинка 3 - границы разработки проекта), но участок с Light In…
👍25❤7
Еще 100 лет пройдет, а Величие этой Победы не померкнет. Потому что никого бы не было ни сейчас, ни через 100 лет, без нее. Много можно себе представить, что БЫЛО БЫ... Но точно не было бы ни меня, ни тебя. С Праздником Великой Победы!❤️❤️❤️
👍31❤15
‼️ Продолжаем собирать подписи до 23 июня для второго обращения! Нам нужно собрать 5 000 подписей. От каждого члена семьи с 18 лет. Повторно оставлять подпись не нужно!‼️ Точки сбора подписей: 🟩 "Бристоль" на Магеллана, 2 🟥 "Базаролл " на Магеллана, 2 🟦 Пекарня на Магеллана, 1 🟨 Пекарня "Санчо Панса" на Веласкеса, 4 🟪 Пекарня…
👍18
С Пасхой, друзья! Самый светлый Праздник, который дает силу и веру - Пасха - это Надежда! Мира всем! Христос Воскрес!
🙏30❤9👍2
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @belozerova_elena. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Елена Белозерова” (@belozerova_elena), 1,035 subscribers as measured 13 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/belozerova_elena.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.