Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for BELOR DESIGN

Channel

BELOR DESIGN

@belor_design

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

13,029subscribers

-407 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001768876314
TypeChannel
Username@belor_design
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/belor_design

Growth

13,02913,43613,232.57 August 2026 — 13,436 subscribers7 August 2026 — 13,436 subscribers8 August 2026 — 13,407 subscribers9 August 2026 — 13,395 subscribers10 August 2026 — 13,270 subscribers11 August 2026 — 13,251 subscribers12 August 2026 — 13,236 subscribers13 August 2026 — 13,228 subscribers14 August 2026 — 13,217 subscribers16 August 2026 — 13,029 subscribers7 August 202616 August 2026
10 measurements spanning 9 days, net -407. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12,968–13,497 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 08:4313,029-188
14 Aug 2026, 23:0713,217-11
13 Aug 2026, 11:5713,228-8
12 Aug 2026, 13:2313,236-15
11 Aug 2026, 12:0413,251-19
10 Aug 2026, 13:0613,270-125
9 Aug 2026, 10:1113,395-12
8 Aug 2026, 11:1213,407-29
7 Aug 2026, 13:1513,436no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:4813,436first reading

Engagement

22 posts held, back to 4 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
11.2%
avg views ÷ 13,029 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,460
22 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.72%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
22
of 22 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 August 2026
Posts held22 (4 August 202614 August 2026)
Views total32,070
Reactions total1,193
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken15 Aug 2026, 11:46 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
3m 13s
Average length
32s

Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,193 reactions across 22 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
31826.7%
🔥24520.5%
❤‍🔥23819.9%
👍18215.3%
🥰13411.2%
🍓403.35%
🤩292.43%
💘70.587%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 22 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,193reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 14 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

14 Aug 2026, 06:34 UTC870 views44 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

План для идеального утра: ✨После всех умывашек наносим увлажняющую базу Prefix🫧 ✨Включаем любимую песню ✨ Идем делать кофе ☕️ Кожа моментально просыпается, сияет и готова встречать этот день! С такой основой макияж ляжет идеально и не поплывет до самого вечера 💙

❤‍🔥14🔥12🥰104👍4

13 Aug 2026, 14:25 UTC≈1,020 views35 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Наш самый любимый этап в макияже: зафиксировать все спреем для фиксации 💧 В жару хочется использовать его буквально каждые 10 минут 🤭 А вы обычно брызгаетесь до нанесения продукта или после? 👀

🥰16❤‍🔥7👍74🔥1

13 Aug 2026, 09:00 UTC≈1,160 views39 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Сравниваем две базы под макияж: Prefix и Glass Molecule 🩵 База Prefix Состав: преимущественно вода, увлажняющие компоненты: алоэ вера, гиалуронат натрия, силиконы и УФ-фильтры. 💙 Эффект: увлажняет и смягчает кожу, подготавливает ее к макияжу, абсорбируя лишний блеск. с SPF15 на каждый день База Glass Molecule Состав: силиконы и компоненты, отвечающие за шелковистость и визуальное сглаживание кожи. 💙 Эффект: силикон

👍2212🥰5

12 Aug 2026, 13:07 UTC≈1,230 views55 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Никогда не догадаетесь, куда добрались наши бирюзовые баночки... на Камчатку🌋 Даже когда кожа не требует макияжа, всегда хочется сохранить ее свежей, увлажненной и без лишнего блеска. Поэтому наша коллекция отправилась именно туда ✈️ Бирюзовое настроение теперь среди вулканов, океана и бескрайних пейзажей 💙

🔥25👍167❤‍🔥7

12 Aug 2026, 08:19 UTC≈1,270 views57 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Video

Баловались с коллегами и наснимали тренды 💙 Заметили ваши продукты-любимчики? 👀

❤‍🔥2316🔥11🥰7

11 Aug 2026, 12:46 UTC≈1,400 views43 reactionsread 15 August 2026

Прощаемся с лишним блеском с помощью новой корректирующей пудры и бейкинга 💓 Мягкий blur-эффект и визуальный лифтинг обеспечен ✨

🔥22🍓9🥰75

11 Aug 2026, 12:45 UTC≈1,350 views25 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🍓11🥰86

11 Aug 2026, 08:05 UTC≈1,450 views46 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

База из 4 бирюзовых баночек, которая должна быть у каждой 💙 💙С помощью базы под макияж подготавливаем кожу. 💙Рисовая пудра фиксирует и контролирует блеск. 💙Спрей-фиксатор закрепляет результат. База + фиксация = макияж, который готов к любым неожиданностям 💫

❤‍🔥20🔥125🥰5🍓2👍2

10 Aug 2026, 14:36 UTC≈1,480 views57 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Стойкий макияж начинается с правильной подготовки и фиксации 🩵 💙База под макияж Glass Molecule визуально выравнивает поверхность кожи, сглаживает поры и мелкие неровности, создавая идеальную основу под тон. 💙Увлажняющая база под макияж Prefix С SPF15 и легкой кремовой текстурой подготавливает кожу к тональному средству и дает базовую защиту от внешней среды 💙Рисовая пудра Final Touch помогает зафиксировать макияж и

29❤‍🔥14🔥7🥰7

10 Aug 2026, 08:34 UTC≈1,360 views57 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Video

Лови волну бирюзового настроения с Belor Design 💙 Наши бирюзовые баночки созданы для того, чтобы наслаждаться летом и не думать о том, как там макияж Базы Glass Molecule и Prefix подготавливают кожу к макияжу, а рисовая пудра Final Touch и спрей Mist Fix помогают сохранить его свежим и стойким на весь день💙 Оставляем кусочек нашего летнего пикника для вас 🧺

🔥28❤‍🔥17🍓84

9 Aug 2026, 14:15 UTC≈1,420 views32 reactionsread 13 August 2026

А заодно подобрали продукты Belor Design, с которыми можно повторить эти макияжи самостоятельно 🩵 Листайте карусель и выбирайте, какой макияж подходит вам 👀

👍16🔥97

9 Aug 2026, 14:14 UTC≈1,410 views45 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Posted without readable text

👍2211🥰11🍓1

Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @belor_design. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 521,601 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“BELOR DESIGN” (@belor_design), 13,029 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/belor_design.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.