Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Белка | Белая Калитва

Channel

Белка | Белая Калитва

@belka_kalitva

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

11,052subscribers

-37 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001248173517
TypeChannel
Username@belka_kalitva
Description🔥ТЕЛЕГРАМ-КАНАЛ №1 В БЕЛОЙ КАЛИТВЕ Предложка/реклама к @anonimkalitva Первый авторский новостной блог в Белокалитвинском районе. Реклама через биржу: https://telega.in/c/belka_kalitva Реестр РКН: https://gosuslugi.ru/snet/68ee59be35e2f53f8a5faea4
Created16 December 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live3 November 2026
Measurements held51
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 3 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/belka_kalitva

Topic

Local community — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

11,04511,09511,0707 August 2026 — 11,089 subscribers7 August 2026 — 11,089 subscribers7 August 2026 — 11,088 subscribers8 August 2026 — 11,085 subscribers9 August 2026 — 11,086 subscribers10 August 2026 — 11,080 subscribers12 August 2026 — 11,081 subscribers13 August 2026 — 11,084 subscribers15 August 2026 — 11,083 subscribers16 August 2026 — 11,080 subscribers17 August 2026 — 11,086 subscribers18 August 2026 — 11,087 subscribers19 August 2026 — 11,086 subscribers22 August 2026 — 11,082 subscribers23 August 2026 — 11,079 subscribers25 August 2026 — 11,077 subscribers26 August 2026 — 11,076 subscribers27 August 2026 — 11,074 subscribers28 August 2026 — 11,066 subscribers29 August 2026 — 11,061 subscribers30 August 2026 — 11,057 subscribers31 August 2026 — 11,080 subscribers1 September 2026 — 11,090 subscribers3 September 2026 — 11,095 subscribers9 September 2026 — 11,094 subscribers11 September 2026 — 11,082 subscribers15 September 2026 — 11,077 subscribers17 September 2026 — 11,074 subscribers25 September 2026 — 11,063 subscribers4 October 2026 — 11,052 subscribers8 October 2026 — 11,045 subscribers13 October 2026 — 11,049 subscribers14 October 2026 — 11,050 subscribers15 October 2026 — 11,054 subscribers16 October 2026 — 11,056 subscribers17 October 2026 — 11,062 subscribers18 October 2026 — 11,063 subscribers19 October 2026 — 11,066 subscribers20 October 2026 — 11,063 subscribers22 October 2026 — 11,059 subscribers22 October 2026 — 11,065 subscribers24 October 2026 — 11,064 subscribers26 October 2026 — 11,063 subscribers27 October 2026 — 11,060 subscribers28 October 2026 — 11,058 subscribers29 October 2026 — 11,057 subscribers30 October 2026 — 11,056 subscribers31 October 2026 — 11,050 subscribers1 November 2026 — 11,055 subscribers2 November 2026 — 11,054 subscribers3 November 2026 — 11,052 subscribers11,0527 August 20263 November 2026
51 measurements spanning 88 days, net -37. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,038–11,103 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 51
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
3 Nov 2026, 04:3111,052-2
2 Nov 2026, 03:0411,054-1
1 Nov 2026, 05:5011,055+5
31 Oct 2026, 03:4911,050-6
30 Oct 2026, 05:3811,056-1
29 Oct 2026, 06:1811,057-1
28 Oct 2026, 02:0011,058-2
27 Oct 2026, 04:0811,060-3
26 Oct 2026, 01:3811,063-1
24 Oct 2026, 01:3711,064-1
22 Oct 2026, 23:2811,065+6
22 Oct 2026, 00:0711,059-4
20 Oct 2026, 17:0611,063-3
19 Oct 2026, 13:5711,066+3
18 Oct 2026, 14:2011,063+1
17 Oct 2026, 14:2711,062+6
16 Oct 2026, 15:5111,056+2
15 Oct 2026, 15:3111,054+4
14 Oct 2026, 12:4011,050+1
13 Oct 2026, 02:0811,049first reading

Engagement

116 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 46 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
5.61%
avg views ÷ 11,052 subscribers
Avg views / post
620
9 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.19%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
9
of 116 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 7 of 9 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 November 2026
Posts held116 (6 August 2026 – 3 November 2026)
Views total5,582
Reactions total55
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Nov 2026, 06:51 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈18,300
Videos
≈1,310
Links
≈481

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 3 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
6m 05s
Average length
1m 31s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

548 reactions across 68 posts, in 28 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 16.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍8916.2%
❤8215.0%
😱7413.5%
😢6010.9%
🤡376.75%
🔥356.39%
👎274.93%
🤣274.93%
❤‍🔥203.65%
😭142.55%
🎉122.19%
😐122.19%
🤩91.64%
🤬91.64%
🤯81.46%
🕊50.912%
🙏50.912%
😁40.73%
🤔40.73%
🗿30.547%
8 further kinds122.19%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 70 of the 116 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 548 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 116 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 3 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Advertising

Ad load
5.17%
6 of 116 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
6
posts carrying an erid · 6 distinct tokens
Median views · ads
772
over 6 measured posts
Median views · rest
766
over 110 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. They are printed side by side with the count behind each rather than as a ratio: an ad and an ordinary post are not otherwise matched — for topic, for length, for hour of day — so the gap between them is a description of two groups and not the effect of one being an ad.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
2VtzqwHHb4o117 August 202617 August 2026
2VtzqwryRXh111 August 202611 August 2026
2Vtzqws6CHH121 August 202621 August 2026
2Vtzqx7w5YX124 August 202624 August 2026
2VtzqxJDCza12 November 20262 November 2026
2VtzqxWAtmh127 August 202627 August 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 116 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 3 November 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

3 Nov 2026, 06:04 UTC138 views2 reactionsread 3 November 2026
Photo

🇷🇺 В Белой Калитве 3 ноября пройдёт праздничное мероприятие «Сила России в единстве народа», посвящённое Дню народного единства. Начало — в 14:00 в большом зале Дворца культуры имени В. Чкалова.

🔥2

2 Nov 2026, 16:11 UTC617 views9 reactionsread 3 November 2026
Photo

📷 Вечер в Сосновом бору Сосновый бор в Соснах — это искусственный лесной массив, высаженный на территории Белокалитвинского района. Изначально лес был посажен здесь в начале XX века. Общая площадь бора составляла порядка 40 гектаров.

❤9

2 Nov 2026, 10:15 UTC744 views4 reactionsread 3 November 2026
Photo

Прокатилась без прав: в Белокалитвинском районе женщина угнала машину знакомого, которую он ей доверил. Выяснилось, что мужчина оставил свою машину на хранение во дворе своей знакомой. Ключи он оставил в зажигании. Учитывая, что авто было в открытом доступе, женщина решила прокатиться, хотя друг ей на это разрешение не давал. Когда 34-летний автовладелец не обнаружил на месте своей «четырнадцатой», он пошел в по…

❤3🤣1

2 Nov 2026, 09:22 UTC718 viewsread 3 November 2026
Advertisementerid 2VtzqxJDCzaPhoto

Приходи работать в «585 Золотой» в Белой Калитве 💎 Ищем продавца-консультанта в нашу команду. 💰 Доход от 60 100 ₽ 📍 Ул. Калинина, 4 Предлагаем официальное трудоустройство, обучение и помощь наставника. Ты сможешь развиваться в продажах и пользоваться скидками для сотрудников. Расти. Развивайся. Сияй вместе с 585 ✨ Откликайся Реклама. ООО «Бета Пресс – Кадровая Реклама», ИНН 7723785339, erid 2VtzqxJDCza

2 Nov 2026, 06:25 UTC775 views12 reactionsread 3 November 2026
Photo

📷 На Майдане в очередной раз высадили "деревья", а точнее палки. Это уже как минимум 4 попытка администрации высадить здесь аллею из кленов и лип. Всё время деревья засыхают без ухода.

😭8🔥2❤1❤‍🔥1

1 Nov 2026, 15:18 UTC894 views26 reactionsread 3 November 2026
Photo

Город в лучах закатного солнца Фото @pristre_lite

🔥19❤‍🔥4❤3

2 Sept 2026, 14:57 UTC910 views26 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

❗️В Белой Калитве нашли погибшим 65-летнего жителя Дмитрия Джикидзе, который пропал после того, как 30 августа уехал из дома на автомобиле По предварительной информации, во время поездки у него случился инфаркт. Автомобиль съехал в кювет и оказался скрыт в высокой траве и среди веток, поэтому его не сразу заметили. Несколько дней мужчину разыскивали родственники и полиция. Прибывшие на место медики констатировали с…

😱17😢7🙏2

2 Sept 2026, 06:22 UTC≈1,060 views9 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @bkalitva_raiyonPhoto

🔔 Сегодня во всех школах нашего района прозвенел первый звонок. На торжественных линейках школьников поздравили педагоги, родители и представители администрации района. 🎊 Звучали добрые напутствия, пожелания успехов в учебе, новых знаний и ярких событий. Пусть этот год будет легким, интересным и продуктивным для каждого ученика!🚀 #АдминистрацияБелокалитвинскогорайона #Поздравления#Деньзнаний

🤡5❤4

Showing the 12 most recent of 116 posts we hold for @belka_kalitva. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 5 posts on @belka_kalitva as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
19 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
21 August 2026
Median time before seen missing
48 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Парк «Лога»
@parkloga · 42,717
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 30 August 2026
Артём Чехович | ПОЖАРНЫЙ
@artem0limp95 · 24,005
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 16 September 2026
Новости Ростова-на-Дону
@rnd_my · 86,379
Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 18 August 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Белка | Белая Калитва” (@belka_kalitva), 11,052 subscribers as measured 3 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/belka_kalitva.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.