Channel
@believe_robot
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
2,408subscribers
-157 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001660284072 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @believe_robot |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 27 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 27 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/believe_robot |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 27 Aug 2026, 04:38 | 2,408 | -25 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 18:55 | 2,433 | -20 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 23:08 | 2,453 | -47 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 19:36 | 2,500 | -22 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 08:34 | 2,522 | -17 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 17:36 | 2,539 | -26 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:02 | 2,565 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:54 | 2,565 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 22 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 21 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
⚠️Quick update⚠️ My dad is in recovery, he had an unexpected eyes surgery last week. For now he is doing well but he needs to rest and wait until his sight comes back. He will post on the chat as soon as he is back.
Weekly Report Gold AI: Still very strong
Weekly Report Believe ICT AI: Finally found a solid foundation, very encouraging week
Weekly Report Gold AI: Still very strong
Weekly Report Believe ICT AI: still need to work on a few adjustements, I am getting very close, this week should be better
Monthly Report Gold AI
Weekly Report Gold AI
Weekly Report Believe ICT AI: still need to work on a few adjustements
⚠️FATHERS DAY Special LIMITED TIME only 48h⚠️ I will only onboard and handfull of new clients as I'm focusing more on development. 🔹 Believe ICT AI Trading System 💰 Regular Price: $1999 → NOW: $1699 🔹 GhostBreak Gold AI 💰 Regular Price: $1799 → NOW: $1599 🔹 Premium AI Trading System - Lifetime Access! 🔥 Includes ALL my AI Trading Systems (EAs not included), even future releases! I'm working on 2 new strategies! 💰…
Weekly Report Gold AI
Weekly Report Believe ICT AI: This is the previous version of the AI, I'm still working on fibalizing the major update and I have spend my weeken to backtest it. This is a major improvement, thank you for your patience.
🚀 Believe ICT AI — Major Upgrade Completed I’m excited to share that a major new version of the Believe ICT AI system has been built and upgraded. This update is not just a small adjustment. It is a complete improvement of the way the bot can analyse, adapt, backtest, optimise, and select the best strategy settings for each instrument. ✅ What’s new? The system now includes: 📊 Full Backtest Mode The bot can now t…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @believe_robot. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 811,015 of 1,622,561entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“BELIEVE FOREX EAs & INDICATORS *PROP FIRMS*MT4*MT5” (@believe_robot), 2,408 subscribers as measured 27 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/believe_robot.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.