Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Белорусская АЭС

@belaes_oficial

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,013subscribers

+2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001857906861
TypeChannel
Username@belaes_oficial
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 31 August 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/belaes_oficial

Topic

Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 74% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Views per post sit far above this size band

1,680 average views per post against 1,013 subscribers — an engagement rate of 166.2%. Across the 54,164 registered channels in the same cohort — 1,000–3,162 subscribers, posting mainly in Russian — the middle half sit between 10.5% and 35.6%, with a median of 20.1%.

What this was computed from
Window30 days (13 July 2026 12 August 2026)
Posts measured11 of 11 published in the window (6 exact, 5 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled18,525
Mature posts only155.7% over 10 posts read at least 24h after publication
Subscribers1,013 measured 9 August 2026
Cohortb1000:rus · 54,164 channels · p10 5.33% · p25 10.5% · p50 20.1% · p75 35.6% · p90 57.1%
Position in cohort99.308th percentile · 8.3× the cohort median
Uncertainty±0.287% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding
Post languageRussian · 90.0%of the window’s posts

When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.

This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal.A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.

Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 12 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

1,0111,0131,0126 August 2026 — 1,011 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,011 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,012 subscribers9 August 2026 — 1,013 subscribers6 August 20269 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 4 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,011–1,013 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 22:311,013+1
6 Aug 2026, 23:521,012+1
6 Aug 2026, 13:071,011no change
6 Aug 2026, 10:301,011first reading

Engagement

11 posts held, back to 23 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
166.2%
avg views ÷ 1,013 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,680
11 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.545%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
11
of 11 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held11 (23 July 20266 August 2026)
Views total18,525
Reactions total101
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 13:07 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

101 reactions across 11 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
4039.6%
👍3029.7%
👏109.90%
🔥54.95%
😍32.97%
❤‍🔥21.98%
🌭21.98%
🎉21.98%
👌21.98%
🥰21.98%
🍌10.99%
😁10.99%
🤔10.99%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 101reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 06:11 UTC≈2,750 views14 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

4 августа в 7:45 после проведения диагностических мероприятий электротехнического оборудования энергоблок № 2 Белорусской АЭС включён в работу и выведен на номинальные параметры. Дальнейшая эксплуатация энергоблока осуществляется в соответствии с технологическими регламентами.

👍83❤‍🔥2😍1

5 Aug 2026, 12:12 UTC226 views10 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @newsby_btrcVideo

Мирный атом это — энергетическая безопасность, высокие технологии и новые рабочие места ▪️Какие эффекты даёт эксплуатация атомной станции для экономики нашей страны? ▪️И почему между строительством нового энергоблока БелАЭС и возведением новой станции мы не выбираем что-то одно? На самые острые вопросы, касающиеся темы развития атомной энергетики, ответят гости проекта "Экономическая среда". Не пропустите, уже сег

6🥰2😍2

4 Aug 2026, 10:39 UTC409 views8 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

⚡️С 1 августа стартовал Месячник охраны труда на Белорусской АЭС, в рамках проведения которого организован целый комплекс профилактических мероприятий. Основная задача — предпринять все необходимые меры для предотвращения несчастных случаев на производстве и сведения к минимуму риска производственного травматизма. В течение этого месяца будут проводиться проверки рабочих мест, дополнительные контрольные обходы, ох

6🔥2

31 Jul 2026, 08:09 UTC819 views10 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Работники Госатомнадзора посетили Белорусскую АЭС 📌30 июля начальник Департамента по ядерной и радиационной безопасности МЧС Александр Иваницкий и представители Госатомнадзора с рабочим визитом посетили Белорусскую АЭС. Работников Госатомнадзора встретили руководство станции во главе с генеральным директором БелАЭС Сергеем Бобовичем, который представил краткий обзор стратегического развития атомной отрасли, подчерк

8🎉2

27 Jul 2026, 22:26 UTC≈1,460 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026

https://belta.by/politics/view/promkooperatsija-selskoe-hozjajstvo-obrazovanie-gubernator-kaluzhskoj-oblasti-o-sotrudnichestve-s-793183-2026/ Промкооперация, сельское хозяйство, образование. Губернатор Калужской области о сотрудничестве с Беларусью

1🍌1👍1

27 Jul 2026, 22:26 UTC≈1,370 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026

В российском регионе создается центр мирового уровня по подготовке специалистов в ядерной энергетике. Подробнее в материале БЕЛТА⬇️

🌭1👍1

27 Jul 2026, 17:33 UTC704 views16 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

🇧🇾Молодежная команда Белорусской АЭС успешно выступила на областном туристическом слете, посвященном Году белорусской женщины С 23 по 25 июля в окрестностях водохранилища Хатьковцы прошел масштабный спортивно-туристический слет молодежи. В турслете приняли участи 18 команд из разных уголков Гродненщины. В этом году организаторы мероприятия предложили участникам насыщенную спортивную программу, которая состояла из т

👏10👍4🔥2

27 Jul 2026, 14:50 UTC617 views9 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

✅Обмен опытом 24 июля представители кадровой службы ОАО «Гродно Азот» побывали с рабочим визитом на БелАЭС. Цель — укрепление сотрудничества и изучение передовых практик в сфере HR. Что обсудили: 🔹 современные методы подбора и отбора персонала; 🔹 программы адаптации сотрудников; 🔹 работу с кадровым резервом; 🔹 профориентацию и поддержку молодых специалистов. Для гостей также провели экскурсию по информационному це

👍8🔥1

26 Jul 2026, 05:12 UTC≈7,620 views9 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Энергоблок №2 Белорусской АЭС отключён от сети персоналом станции для проведения диагностических мероприятий электротехнического оборудования. Радиационный фон не изменился. Электроснабжение потребителей не нарушено. После завершения работ энергоблок будет включён в сеть.

5👌2🤔1😁1

24 Jul 2026, 09:15 UTC990 views7 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

🇧🇾 Ты готов прославить Беларусь на весь мир? У нас есть миссия для настоящих творцов: ищется официальный туристический логотип и слоган нашей страны! Это твой шанс вписать свое имя в историю и сделать так, чтобы о Беларуси узнали миллионы. 🎨 Что нужно сделать? Разработать визуальный образ и слоган, которые лучше всего передают дух Беларуси в рамках Национального конкурса «Вобраз Беларусі. Позірк і адкрыццё». 🚀 Кто

5👍2

23 Jul 2026, 19:45 UTC≈1,560 views13 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

👍Учились выстраивать коммуникацию и проектировать будущее Молодые специалисты БелАЭС вернулись с международного молодежного форума «Форсаж - 2026» Традиционно научно-образовательный форум сообществ молодых специалистов «Форсаж-2026» проходил в Калужской области и объединил более 500 участников из 30 стран мира. В этом году темой форума стала «Культура производства: будущее в настоящем». В центре образовательной пр

6👍6🌭1

Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @belaes_oficial. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 22,961 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Белорусская АЭС” (@belaes_oficial), 1,013 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/belaes_oficial.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.