10 measurements spanning 9 days, net +57. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,503–11,578 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
14 Aug 2026, 21:18
11,569
+33
13 Aug 2026, 10:15
11,536
-2
12 Aug 2026, 10:33
11,538
+3
11 Aug 2026, 11:03
11,535
-3
10 Aug 2026, 08:32
11,538
-2
9 Aug 2026, 11:01
11,540
-3
8 Aug 2026, 11:11
11,543
+3
7 Aug 2026, 11:38
11,540
+24
6 Aug 2026, 14:24
11,516
+4
6 Aug 2026, 08:19
11,512
first reading
Engagement
102 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
25.2%
avg views ÷ 11,569 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,910
102 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.58%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
102
of 102 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 99 of 102 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 August 2026
Posts held
102 (5 August 2026 – 14 August 2026)
Views total
297,290
Reactions total
4,582
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
15 Aug 2026, 02:52 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈317
Videos
≈128
Links
≈3,030
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
4m 59s
Average length
2m 30s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
3,585 reactions across 79 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
835
23.3%
👍
623
17.4%
😡
441
12.3%
🔥
410
11.4%
🤣
388
10.8%
😢
256
7.14%
👏
149
4.16%
😁
126
3.51%
🏆
76
2.12%
🙏
67
1.87%
😎
65
1.81%
😨
62
1.73%
👌
44
1.23%
🤷♂
32
0.893%
🤔
5
0.139%
😍
2
0.056%
🤨
2
0.056%
🥰
2
0.056%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 99 of the 102 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,582reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 102 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 14 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
❗️עדכון❗️
ירדן שועה הצהיר: "המטרה היא לזכות באליפות. נעשה את זה"
קפטן בית"ר סיכם את המסע האירופי בריאיון לרדיו ירושלים: "לא הגיע לנו לעוף". על מעבר לחו"ל: "אם היה בא משהו כולם היו יודעים"
מאת: #וואלה_ספורט
בית"ר ירושלים נכנעה אמש (חמישי) לאוסטריה וינה בתום דו קרב פנדלים, ובסיומה של דרמה גדולה סיימה את דרכה במוקדמות הקונפרנס ליג. בריאיון שנערך מווינה, סיפר ירדן שועה לרדיו ירושלים על סיום המסע האירופי של הקבוצה, שה…
אוהדי בית"ר אתמול בלילה: אין אין אני חייב הפסקה מהקבוצה הזאת אל תדברו איתי עד שמתחילה הליגה.
אוהדי בית"ר היום: למי יש כרטיס למשחק דירוג על מקום 709 בגביע הטוטו ברחובות משלם כל מחיררררר
אני עוד לא נרגעתי מזה ששועה שהוא בועט פנדלים הכי מנוסה שהיה אתמול בדו קרב פנדלים (אצילי לא יכל לבעוט) לא בעט פנדל. איזה הזיה זאת.
הוא היה חייב לבעוט פנדל 3-4 במקום מוזי ואנסה.
קראבלי כבלם בועט ושועה לא בועט? למה?
עוד נקודה למחשבה:
ביתר עוד לא התחילה את העונה וכבר עפה משני מפעלים, טוטו ואירופה. נשאר ליגה שזה הכי חשוב וגביע המדינה.
בית"ר צריכה מידיית בעל בית דומיננטי באמצע ברמה הכי גבוהה שיש, שחקן מוכח ואיכותי ששמים עליו הרבה כסף ויש כסף!
דבר אחד קטן מאתמול:
עוד לא הוכח שאם לא בועטים כדורים למעלה ומנפלים עליהם בחלק המסוכן של המשחק זה פחות יעיל ממסירות אינסופיות בין הבלמים לשוער.
אני לא אמור לבלות 70 אחוז מזמן הצפייה שלי במשחק בלראות את הכדור נע לרוחב בין ההגנה לשוער בלופ שלא נגמר. זה לא שיטה, זה דרעק. תתקדמו.
Showing the 12 most recent of 102 posts we hold for @beitarfans. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 528,894 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“מועדון אוהדי בית"ר ירושלים” (@beitarfans), 11,569 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/beitarfans.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
