Channel
Being Mechanical (Mechanical Test Series)
@beingmechanical_91
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
2,880subscribers
+84 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001361320687 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @beingmechanical_91 |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 13 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/beingmechanical_91 |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 15 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 66% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Sept 2026, 15:59 | 2,880 | +2 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 14:15 | 2,878 | no change |
| 11 Sept 2026, 19:21 | 2,878 | +12 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 18:27 | 2,866 | +12 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 16:45 | 2,854 | +9 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 11:16 | 2,845 | +6 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 12:25 | 2,839 | +12 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 18:37 | 2,827 | +10 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 20:54 | 2,817 | +5 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 15:37 | 2,812 | +10 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 09:04 | 2,802 | +5 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 23:55 | 2,797 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:05 | 2,796 | first reading |
Engagement
Posts not read yet. This entry is on the register from its profile alone; the post reader has not reached it. Engagement figures appear here once posts have actually been measured — we do not publish a rate before we have the readings behind it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@Math_1st_Grade_2nd_Grade · 43,748
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 29 August 2026
@GATEWallahMechanicalengineering · 37,928
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 1 September 2026
@RRB_SSC_JE_2026 · 37,763
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 1 September 2026
@gatewallah_official · 97,925
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 16 August 2026
@TrulyEngineers · 38,938
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 31 August 2026
This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Being Mechanical (Mechanical Test Series)” (@beingmechanical_91), 2,880 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/beingmechanical_91.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.