Channel
@beijing3399
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
39,389subscribers
+893 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002225491236 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @beijing3399 |
| Description | 上榜认证管理 @swkqtds888 北京出击聊天群 :https://t.me/beijing2299 狼友们找资源在认证榜找以免上当受骗。 |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/beijing3399 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 21:28 | 39,389 | +710 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 09:47 | 38,679 | +63 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 12:48 | 38,616 | +120 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 17:45 | 38,496 | no change |
| 11 Aug 2026, 17:31 | 38,496 | first reading |
10 posts held, back to 26 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 7 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 10 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 10 (26 July 2026 – 14 August 2026) |
| Views total | 20,300 |
| Reactions total | 0 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 15 Aug 2026, 01:11 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
#霸气商务风 #北京商K #北京游戏场 #高端商K #北京游戏场营业中 ️1️⃣商务应酬、朋友小聚，这里有格调、有氛围、有面子，尽兴才是硬道理。💗 2️⃣高端环境·专业音效·贴心服务，谈生意、庆功宴、生日趴，一站搞定。 3️⃣ 灯红酒绿不迷眼，歌声美酒敬知己，商务休闲两不误。 主打游戏女孩500场中高端场商务宴请。 客服：@abh789987 频道：@abg52011111 双向联系：@VB8VTBOT ☎️18210928615 同微信 🥳😜😜😝 6
[大圣精品飞机号六年信誉老店] [各国年份飞机号老群组老频道] 老师聊单专用号↓半年的号30元 防注销精养老号↓一年的号60元 做业务专用老号↓二年的号80元 [代开飞机会员] [代上僵尸粉] [代开双向机器人] [代刷浏览量] 咨询联系 ： https://t.me/fjhzdas 关注频道 ： https://t.me/datgzs
莹莹 @bj_feifei 100优惠券【限10天内有效】
😀飞机会员🌟 代开双向机器人 老师聊单专用号↓ 私人使用 耐操 半年的号 30元 一年的号 60元 二年的号 80元 三年的号 140元 五年的号 180元 一年群/频道 80 元 两年群/频道 140元 咨询联系 ： 大圣 @qtdsfjh 关注频道 ： https://t.me/datgzs 😭
😂北京摸摸唱KTV-死摸死亲❗️ 如果你觉得摸摸唱只是喝酒😏🍻+摸一摸❓ 那你就真的只体验到了冰山一角🥳 摸🥵只是最基础的互动👅 👅氛围到位，🍓互动才是重点🥵 🍓各种互动游戏🍓欢乐不断🍓 包厢里想怎么玩就怎么玩🍓气氛直接拉满😀 😀😀😀😀🌼💛😀😀😀😀😀 💕兄弟聚会🤩生日小酌🤩下班放松🤩 🔥来这里图的就是一个开心💞尽兴、放松🥂 来一次🤩你就知道为什么这么多兄弟反复来玩✨ 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 😱提前订房🏗少排队，🏗早点来选择更多！ 🧴🛎🧺🧺🧺🧺🧺 ✈️：@sk15010512321 频道：https://t.me/beijingSk888888 双向：@Beijing9998_bot 📞：15010512321同🌍 #北京摸摸唱 #北京ktv #北京商k预定
Telegram必备的搜索引擎，极搜JISOU帮你精准找到，想要的群组、频道、视频、音乐 👉 t.me/jisou2?start=a_7325897610
😦位置：#北京 #大望路SKP附近 👉艺名：#倩儿 💸课费：1000/p-1500/pp 🚀私聊：@chenchen1789 😼频道：https://t.me/bjinchenchen ✅双向机器人：@Bbchene_bot 项目：#2舌吻、#调情e、#制服诱惑、#陪浴熊推、#口爆 #角色扮演、等全套 📣😄😄😄😄 😀😃😄😆
Telegram必备的搜索引擎，极搜JISOU帮你精准找到，想要的群组、频道、视频、音乐 👉 t.me/jisou2?start=a_7325897610
北京商k北京KTV摸摸唱游戏场，高端商k🌹 玩的提早找我预订包厢🌹 早订不排队不等位🌹 早到美女多有100位佳丽可选🌹 00后美女特色游戏中场关灯🌹 气氛女助理带玩各种游戏🌹 主打一个玩得开，👙能亲能摸能抱玩得开🌹 🌹 北京游戏场找我不迷路🌹 靠谱安排先选人，后消费🌹 #上北京游戏场 #北京商K ------------------------- 北京KTV，北京商K ，北京游戏KTV 最好玩的商K 需要了解安排的 ❗️联系客服：@BST899 ❗️微信客服：JJ16561 ❗️微信电话：13127723272 ❗️频道展示：https://t.me/BST88999 #北京商K #北京KTV #北京商务KTV #北京游戏场
😦位置：#北京 #通州 #通州区 通州北关 👉艺名：#唐玄奘 💸课费：1200/p-2000/pp 🚀私聊：@tangxuanzang888 😼频道：https://t.me/bbac3374 双向机器人：@shuangxjjjjbot 性格开朗温柔，酥酥粉嫩全huo服务火辣，服务态度超级好、超级性感、小蛮腰，#鸳鸯洗”、#水中潇、#指划饶痒痒、#易推、#臀推、#阴推、#过水、#漫游、#刮痧、#独龙，#吹箫、#深喉、#口爆、#丝袜，#丝玉足）》、#制服诱惑，#2心，#同69、#带Tpapa。回味无穷、温柔碗抱 📣😄😄😄😄 😀😃😄😆
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @beijing3399. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,473,550 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“北京修车精选【推荐榜】” (@beijing3399), 39,389 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/beijing3399.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.