Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for BC

Channel

BC

@behenchod

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry

7subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001103630508
TypeChannel
Username@behenchod
CreatedBetween 1 February 2017 and 31 July 2019— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live26 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 26 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/behenchod

Growth

676.56 August 2026 — 6 subscribers12 August 2026 — 6 subscribers26 August 2026 — 7 subscribers6 August 202626 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 20 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6–7 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
26 Aug 2026, 06:447+1
12 Aug 2026, 19:336no change
6 Aug 2026, 00:536first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 24 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
425.7%
avg views ÷ 7 subscribers
Avg views / post
29.8
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
5
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026
Posts held20 (24 June 20269 August 2026)
Views total149
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 19:33 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
28s
Average length
28s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

2 reactions across 2 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 24 June 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

9 Aug 2026, 06:34 UTC19 viewsread 12 August 2026

You know what I miss? Those random messages with no meaning. Those random fights with no meaning. Those random touches with no meaning. Those random laughs with no meaning. None of it had to make sense; it was just there, and I loved every bit of it. When everything else was taken away, all I had left were those memories. Don't let them sit there and waste away as just memories. Move forward and revive them. None

6 Aug 2026, 16:31 UTC27 viewsread 12 August 2026

The biggest conflict I have is this: should I wait and see what the universe has decided for me, or strive hard enough to bend the universe into giving me what I want? I've always been the person who chooses the latter, and I can't imagine doing the former. But I'm at a stage where I've lost everything, and everything feels beyond my control. I tried. I tried so hard. But now I'm just exhausted, so I've decided t

28 Jul 2026, 18:38 UTC52 viewsread 12 August 2026

What if I'm the type of person who just can't rest? Because I’ve always believed God helps those who help themselves. What if I’m someone who doesn't even have time to care about how I feel inside? It’s not manipulation or drama—it’s literally just me trying to survive. All I know is how to keep moving forward. Isiliye main baith kar wait nahi kar sakta. I don't expect things to be handed to me. I just ask God to ble

23 Jul 2026, 16:36 UTC66 viewsread 12 August 2026

Patches There's so much emptiness all around. One gazes toward the horizon, hoping to mend what is broken. You wonder why rush, just be patient. But ask someone who's dying... all they've got is right now. I'm so mad, but also really sad. I'm mixed up, yet I feel clear. I just need something to fill this void. All I'll do is cry and cry... until someone dries my tears. I yearn for everything, yet possess nothing

18 Jul 2026, 10:05 UTC78 viewsread 12 August 2026

This is a straightforward reminder: if you recognize that your past actions will lead to future regret, you should pause and attempt to rectify them while you still have the opportunity; otherwise, the consequences may become irreparable.

18 Jul 2026, 06:06 UTC65 viewsread 12 August 2026

Eating my headspace. It happens due to these two words: reasons why you met that person and made a connection, and how the connection is still alive. A person with none understands nothing. A person with either craves the latter. A person with both will never truly appreciate it because it's never that important.

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @behenchod. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“BC” (@behenchod), 7 subscribers as measured 26 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/behenchod.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.