Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 22 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 64% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
33 measurements spanning 52 days, net -3,332. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 95,771–100,103 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
28 Sept 2026, 11:21
96,271
-1,150
17 Sept 2026, 18:39
97,421
-134
15 Sept 2026, 16:37
97,555
-74
13 Sept 2026, 22:21
97,629
-112
12 Sept 2026, 06:39
97,741
-123
9 Sept 2026, 21:56
97,864
-166
6 Sept 2026, 16:16
98,030
-157
4 Sept 2026, 03:01
98,187
-56
2 Sept 2026, 17:55
98,243
-70
1 Sept 2026, 20:04
98,313
-40
31 Aug 2026, 22:27
98,353
-82
30 Aug 2026, 20:39
98,435
-81
29 Aug 2026, 19:35
98,516
-57
28 Aug 2026, 21:23
98,573
-105
27 Aug 2026, 18:14
98,678
-54
26 Aug 2026, 18:52
98,732
-90
25 Aug 2026, 22:04
98,822
-67
25 Aug 2026, 01:13
98,889
-82
23 Aug 2026, 16:56
98,971
-138
22 Aug 2026, 03:04
99,109
first reading
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 20 May 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 111 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
16.5%
avg views ÷ 96,271 subscribers
Avg views / post
15,900
1 post measured
Reaction rate
4.18%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 19 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 18 September 2026
Posts held
19 (20 May 2025 – 18 September 2026)
Views total
15,900
Reactions total
664
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
29 Sept 2026, 23:38 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
34
Videos
2
Links
19
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 29 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
16s
Average length
8s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
37,535 reactions across 19 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
16,837
44.9%
👍
12,097
32.2%
🔥
3,812
10.2%
👏
821
2.19%
🤔
655
1.75%
😁
568
1.51%
🥰
475
1.27%
🥱
436
1.16%
💔
325
0.866%
🙊
305
0.813%
🍌
262
0.698%
🥴
187
0.498%
🤯
167
0.445%
🎉
127
0.338%
⚡
115
0.306%
🙈
74
0.197%
🗿
71
0.189%
💯
67
0.179%
🤝
58
0.155%
👀
52
0.139%
1 further kind
24
0.064%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 37,535 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 20 May 2025 to 18 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🎁 Lucky Chest is officially LIVE in the Bee Play Center!
Hey Beelievers, it’s time to test your luck! 🍯
Jump into the Bee App Play Center and open Lucky Chests to unlock Bee Honey, KYC eligibility, a Bee Premium trial, Mining Boost, and more. And Multiple 10,000 Bee Honey grand prizes are waiting to be claimed!✨
Are you ready to discover what’s inside?
🎉 Hey Beelievers! Time for a quick Bee challenge!
Manus AI is now inside Bee, and we want to know what you would create first. Head over to X, cast your vote. Let’s see what the community picks.
https://x.com/beenetworkintl/status/2061737918327361608?s=46
🐝 Happy 520 Bee’s Day, Beelievers!
To celebrate this special day, Bee Network is opening 100K KYC verification for users worldwide.
Thank you for being part of our global Bee community 💛
Bee update: Redesigned home & new exploration. 🐝📱
Meet Bee’s conversational assistant—simpler, interactive, helpful from day one. 🚀
Update, start mining, tap Bee to begin. ⛏️✨
Dear 🇮🇳Bees:
Some Indian ISPs may intermittently block or throttle traffic to cryptocurrency-related mining apps.
Using a different network (switching from Wi-Fi to mobile data) or a VPN can sometimes bypass this.
Dear India🇮🇳 Bees, we've noticed that some of you are having trouble logging in right now.
It looks like it's due to a DNS resolution issue. Our Core Team is on it, working hard to resolve it.
We'll keep you updated as soon as the issue is fixed.
Congrats to 🇧🇷Beeliever dannel07, who placed on yesterday's PnL% leaderboard,
1000 $NIGHT has been sent to your wallet. 🤑🤑
Trading competition on Bee DEX continues. Who would be the next iPhone 17 winner?🏆
Join Competition
The winner is…
🥳🥳🥳
Congratulations to Melika1234 for winning 1000 $NIGHT!
YOU can be the next. 🔜
Join Bee Dex Christmas Trading Competition to win iPhone 17!
Unlock KYC access and airdrops now. 🎁
🎄 Happy Holidays, Beelievers! 🎄
The Bee DEX Christmas Trading Competition is LIVE! 🚀🎁
Trade $NIGHT on Bee Dex to win iPhone 17 ultimate holiday gift! 📱✨
Plus:
·10,000 $NIGHT tokens
·KYC qualifications
·Bee Coins, Boosts, and more gifts! 🐝
Trade now
❤507👍172💔55👏48🔥25
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @beenetwork_comm. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Bee Community” (@beenetwork_comm), 96,271 subscribers as measured 28 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/beenetwork_comm.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.