Channel
@bedrosova_kniga
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
140subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002852062767 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @bedrosova_kniga |
| Created | Between 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/bedrosova_kniga |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 22:31 | 140 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 07:17 | 140 | first reading |
13 posts held, back to 11 November 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 21 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
181 reactions across 13 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 103 | 56.9% | |
| 🔥 | 56 | 30.9% | |
| ❤🔥 | 6 | 3.31% | |
| ⚡ | 3 | 1.66% | |
| 👀 | 3 | 1.66% | |
| 👏 | 3 | 1.66% | |
| 🥰 | 3 | 1.66% | |
| 🦄 | 2 | 1.10% | |
| 💔 | 1 | 0.552% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 0.552% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 181reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 11 November 2025 to 21 December 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
"Жизнь после смерти" Я хотела, чтобы мой муж жил в памяти и помощи другим людям. Тот самый ДАР, про который я пишу в книге- это ведь и происходит 🙈 и мне и тем, кто прочитал, почувствовал, прочувствовал, создал внутри себя зерно жизни и выдоха для тела.... Надеюсь дальше все получится🤞 Пока не раскрываем... У меня осталось несколько штук моего первого авторского тиража с подписью. Чтобы приобрести, пишите в @zab…
🔥8❤5💯1
Жизнь как река...
❤7
Книги продолжают приходить к заказчикам 🥰 получаю много много обратной связи, эмоций и выводов. Цель этого произведения была "ПОМОЩЬ" Поделитесь пожалуйста, чем помогла вам эта книга ? Или о чем она именно для вас?⬇️
⚡3🔥2
Мне так ценна ваша обратная связь, о книге... О том, что вы уже ее перечитываете, о том, что подчёркиваете фразы, о слезах освобождения в моих словах и смыслах. Что рекомендуете друзьям и родственникам. А скрин на фото- удивительная ценность для меня как автора- "прочитав, захотела себе личную"... Благодарю каждого , Все не зря❤️ Купить книгу для себя или заказать для друга можете, написав в службу заботы "книга" …
🔥6❤4
В сб прошла презентация и я до сих пор в огромной благодарности и силе того момента! Благодарю ВАС ВСЕХ❤️❤️❤️❤️ Кто хочет получить книгу с моей подписью, пишите "КНИГА" в службу заботы @zabota_gorizont
❤8🔥4
Video message, posted without a caption
❤4🔥4
Video message, posted without a caption
❤14
Video message, posted without a caption
❤12🔥7
Когда я писала свою книгу о горе — ту, что структурирована по месяцам, — я была уверена, что главное это выговориться. Излить боль на бумагу. И я это сделала. А потом, спустя время, я ее перечитала. И увидела, что слог неровный. Где-то — обрывистые, рубленые фразы, будто не хватает сил выстроить длинное предложение. Где-то — наивные метафоры, которые сейчас кажутся неуместными. А в некоторых главах сквозит какая-то…
❤6🔥6
Сегодня на особенном мероприятии. И пусть книга рождает новые жизни, зажигает новые огоньки и создает новые смыслы 🤍
❤19👏3🥰3
Это невероятное ощущение... У нас осталось 5 мест на презентацию, занять ➡️ пиши "Хочу билет" в @zabota_gorizont Книга входит в билет *
🔥17❤4
Дамы, ну я в восторге уже не первый день.. Какие знаменитые люди придут и прилетят на презентацию 🙈 Честь для меня. Все познакомитесь😍
❤13🦄2
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @bedrosova_kniga. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,091,446 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Книга А. Бедросовой” (@bedrosova_kniga), 140 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bedrosova_kniga.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.