Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

АНТон всегда активити🩷

@bedroomsuitee

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2,867subscribers

+26 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001716203783
TypeChannel
Username@bedroomsuitee
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/bedroomsuitee

Growth

2,8382,8672,852.57 August 2026 — 2,841 subscribers8 August 2026 — 2,838 subscribers11 August 2026 — 2,865 subscribers14 August 2026 — 2,867 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 6 days, net +26. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,834–2,871 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 01:282,867+2
11 Aug 2026, 05:242,865+27
8 Aug 2026, 08:222,838-3
7 Aug 2026, 16:472,841first reading

Engagement

10 posts held, back to 6 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
24.3%
avg views ÷ 2,867 subscribers
Avg views / post
697
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
16.6%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
10
of 10 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held10 (6 August 20267 August 2026)
Views total6,968
Reactions total1,157
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 16:47 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 45s
Average length
26s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,157 reactions across 10 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 542693444114872124424020.7%
custom 529635854476801933423120.0%
🤝22419.4%
custom 529203871820128978713111.3%
custom 52247332220085604491038.90%
custom 5258213192160540583887.61%
custom 5456501090503653217524.49%
😭262.25%
custom 5357349167725316426252.16%
custom 5298578325600512356242.07%
💅121.04%
custom 529852634361132913810.086%

Custom emoji. 9 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,157reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 15:14 UTC445 views97 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

тоже подумали сначала, что он фотку со свадьбы скинул?

custom 529203871820128978768🤝18custom 535734916772531642611

7 Aug 2026, 14:59 UTC492 views69 reactionsread 7 August 2026

теряю схватку

🤝49😭13custom 52920387182012897877

7 Aug 2026, 14:56 UTC501 views89 reactionsread 7 August 2026

пиздец, 3 выпуска историй не просмотрено, надо быстрее исправлять☠☠☠☠

🤝57custom 535734916772531642614😭11custom 52920387182012897873custom 52963585447680193343custom 52985263436113291381

7 Aug 2026, 13:25 UTC655 views108 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

кот невозможный🥹

custom 522473322200856044980custom 529857832560051235614custom 542693444114872124414

7 Aug 2026, 12:58 UTC711 views113 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

люблю этого дурака, а глазки какие зеленые🥹

custom 525821319216054058381custom 529203871820128978716custom 545650109050365321710custom 52985783256005123565custom 52247332220085604491

7 Aug 2026, 12:48 UTC720 views132 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

✋✋✋

custom 5426934441148721244100custom 545650109050365321717💅11custom 52985783256005123563custom 52247332220085604491

7 Aug 2026, 12:47 UTC714 views92 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

стоит красавец в белой рубашке 🫦

custom 542693444114872124475custom 52920387182012897878custom 52582131921605405836custom 52247332220085604493

7 Aug 2026, 12:24 UTC769 views159 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

ОГО ОГО

custom 5296358544768019334124custom 545650109050365321717custom 529203871820128978714custom 52985783256005123562custom 52247332220085604491custom 52582131921605405831

6 Aug 2026, 22:05 UTC997 views153 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Покажи мне свои глаза Покажи мне свою ложь Покажи мне свою кожу Покажи мне свой грех Покажи мне свои движения Покажи мне свой ритм Покажи мне свой поток Покажи мне свое сияние Покажи мне свою атмосферу Покажи мне свою сторону Покажи мне свой огонь Я твой лжец Покажи мне свои губы Покажи мне свои бедра Покажи мне свою улыбку Покажи мне свой стиль

custom 5296358544768019334104custom 542693444114872124426custom 522473322200856044916custom 54565010905036532174😭2💅1

6 Aug 2026, 21:43 UTC964 views145 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

ИДИТЕ НАХУЙ ПОЖАЛУЙСТА

🤝100custom 542693444114872124425custom 529203871820128978715custom 54565010905036532174custom 52247332220085604491

Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @bedroomsuitee. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 134,918 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“АНТон всегда активити🩷” (@bedroomsuitee), 2,867 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bedroomsuitee.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.