Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for به دنبال نور

Channel

به دنبال نور

@bedonbalenoor

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2,535subscribers

-33 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002007214331
TypeChannel
Username@bedonbalenoor
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live1 September 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 1 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/bedonbalenoor

Growth

2,5352,5682,551.56 August 2026 — 2,568 subscribers6 August 2026 — 2,568 subscribers7 August 2026 — 2,564 subscribers10 August 2026 — 2,559 subscribers13 August 2026 — 2,554 subscribers16 August 2026 — 2,557 subscribers19 August 2026 — 2,553 subscribers23 August 2026 — 2,542 subscribers25 August 2026 — 2,539 subscribers1 September 2026 — 2,535 subscribers6 August 20261 September 2026
10 measurements spanning 26 days, net -33. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,530–2,573 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
1 Sept 2026, 01:382,535-4
25 Aug 2026, 22:272,539-3
23 Aug 2026, 03:352,542-11
19 Aug 2026, 07:522,553-4
16 Aug 2026, 15:182,557+3
13 Aug 2026, 01:262,554-5
10 Aug 2026, 07:262,559-5
7 Aug 2026, 00:012,564-4
6 Aug 2026, 05:312,568no change
6 Aug 2026, 05:192,568first reading

Engagement

31 posts held, back to 2 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
11.1%
avg views ÷ 2,535 subscribers
Avg views / post
280
30 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.54%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
31
of 31 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held31 (2 August 20267 August 2026)
Views total8,408
Reactions total466
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 16:23 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

275 reactions across 20 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
12645.8%
👍9233.5%
💔134.73%
🥰114.00%
👎103.64%
💯82.91%
👏51.82%
😍31.09%
🗿20.727%
😢20.727%
❤‍🔥10.364%
👌10.364%
🤩10.364%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 30 of the 31 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 466 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 31 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 16:11 UTC25 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

آيَةُ اللَّهِ الْعُظْمىٰ...♥️ #اللهم‌عجل‌لولیک‌الفرج

2

7 Aug 2026, 15:08 UTC82 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026

اینا حکم «هله‌هوله» رو دارن «غذای اصلی معرفت» چیز دیگه‌ست مثلا زندگینامه شهدا فقط برای ترغیب و الگو گرفتن خوبه وگرنه منبع معرفت نیست

3👍1👎1

7 Aug 2026, 13:46 UTC122 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026

مثلا در کتاب اصول کافی یه بابی هست به اسم «الحجة» که هزار حدیث راجع به امامت و ولایت داره که اگه با تفکر بخونیش برابری میکنه با هزاران کتاب «تجربه‌مرگ» و از این دسته کتابها مستند شنود معرفت آدم رو نسبت به امام زمانش بالاتر میبره یا غیبت نعمانی و مهدی موعود علامه مجلسی؟! احتجاج طبرسی پایه های دین رو قوی میکنه یا زندگینامه شهدا؟! زندگینامه شهدا نتیجه رو بهت نشون میده نه پایه و آغاز رو! پس معرفت ریشه ای بهت نمیده

👍5👎2💯1

7 Aug 2026, 11:59 UTC191 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026

⭕️ عکس سلفی با کوه vs کوهنوردی فرق این دو طیف از کتب دقیقا مثل مقایسه بالاست اولی دنبال «لذتِ موقتیِ دین» هست و دومی دنبال «حقیقت دین» اولی دنبال جانشین کردنِ «شیرینی دین» به جای «عمق دین» هست که ظاهری جذاب و در عین حال گول زننده داره

👍5👎1💯1

7 Aug 2026, 11:36 UTC203 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026

کتاب فلان شهید کتاب کرامات فلان عارف کتاب فلان تجربه‌گر مرگ و... اینا شاید #ذوق و #احساساتِ مذهبی رو افزایش بده و آدم رو جذب دینداری بکنه اما #علمیت و #معرفتِ پایه‌ای و ریشه‌ای به انسان نمیده متاسفانه اکثر مذهبیا یا کتابخون نیستن یا فقط از اینجور کتابها مطالعه میکنن در حالی که حتما یه شیعه باید کتب اصیل و دست اول خصوصا در مورد #اعتقادات که همون اصول دین هستن رو مطالعه بکنه علاوه بر کتب روایی مثل کافی و بحارالانوا

8👍1👎1

6 Aug 2026, 19:43 UTC258 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

4❤‍🔥1

6 Aug 2026, 19:40 UTC259 views26 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

ای ماهِ کامل که پشت ابری ما که بریدیم تو کوه صبری أَيْنَ بَقِيَّةُ اللهِ؟💔

23🤩1😍1😢1

6 Aug 2026, 17:26 UTC270 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026

مجلسی اول (پدر علامه مجلسی) می‌گوید: «احكام الهى بگونه‌ای متغير شده است كه بغير از شمشير حضرت صاحب الامر صلوات الله عليه اصلاحِ اين فساد نمى‌توان كرد، و هر چند بقیه سعى در اصلاح كنند عين فساد مى‌شود، چون نشو و نماى عالميان بر باطل شده است و به اين عادت شده، و هر خوبى در نظر ايشان بد شده است و هر بدى خوب شده است. حق سبحانه و تعالى ظهور آن حضرت را نزديک گرداند....» 📚لوامع صاحبقرانى ، ج۵ ، ص۴۹۵ #اللهم‌عجل‌لولیک‌الفرج

13👍2😢1

6 Aug 2026, 08:03 UTC300 views27 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

حاج اسماعیل دولابی رو شاید خیلی از مذهبیا بشناسن و حرفاشون رو در کانالای مذهبی دیده باشن شاید در ذهن خیلیا تقدس داشته باشه اما متاسفانه انحرافاتی داشتن به #تصوف آلوده بودن و خیلی وقتا از مسیر شریعت منحرف شدن اسماعیل دولابی: چندین بار مسجد و نماز و مقدسین را رها کردیم و‌ به خانقاه رفتیم ، دوباره مسجد و‌ دوباره خانقاه... آخر کار ساکن #خانقاه شدیم 📚کتاب طوبای محبت ۲/۱۲۹ خانقاه یعنی محل گردهمایی صوفیان همین آقای د

👍18👎43💔1💯1

6 Aug 2026, 07:30 UTC276 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

13👍1🗿1

6 Aug 2026, 07:17 UTC285 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026

⭕️ عرفان یعنی شناخت خدا که جز از طریق ثقلین امکان پذیر نیست و بقیش یا کلا باطله یا آلوده به باطل اما در مورد عرفانِ مصطلح : یعنی همون سیر و سلوک و شهود و مکاشفه و... که امروزه فرقی با تصوف نداره نباید به سمتش رفت معصومین امر نکردن دنبال کسانی باشیم که: چشم برزخی و طی الارض دارن مکاشفه و کرامات دارن ریاضت و گوشه گیری دارن تجربه‌گر مرگ و فلان بودن و... علتش هم اینه که تمام این افعال رو میشه از راه های شیطانی هم کسب

9👏2👍1💯1🗿1

5 Aug 2026, 15:37 UTC393 views25 reactionsread 7 August 2026

اگه فلان دکتر نبود درمان نمیشدم! اگه فلانی نبود از گرسنگی مرده بودیم! اگه فلانی راننده نبود حتما تصادف میکردیم! اگه فلان مدیر نبود هرگز کار پیدا نمیکردم! اگه سخنرانی های فلانی نبود هرگز هدایت نمیشدم! و... جمله «اگر نبود خمینی ، نبود اسلامی» هم غلطه همه اینا شرک محسوب میشه چون اینا رو شریک خداوند قرار دادیم مسبب الاسباب خداست شافی و رازق و حافظ و هادی و... فقط خداست البته ما نمیخوام تشکر از مخلوق رو نفی بکنیم

👍203👌1👎1

Showing the 12 most recent of 31 posts we hold for @bedonbalenoor. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,588,837 of 1,629,419 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 1 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“به دنبال نور” (@bedonbalenoor), 2,535 subscribers as measured 1 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bedonbalenoor.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.