Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Экзистенция от Э до Я

Channel

Экзистенция от Э до Я

@because_fuck_you_thats_why

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,391subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001108107513
TypeChannel
Username@because_fuck_you_thats_why
Created27 January 2017measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 September 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/because_fuck_you_thats_why

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 17 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 75% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1,3831,3921,387.56 August 2026 — 1,390 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,390 subscribers15 August 2026 — 1,391 subscribers18 August 2026 — 1,392 subscribers22 August 2026 — 1,389 subscribers25 August 2026 — 1,385 subscribers12 September 2026 — 1,383 subscribers16 September 2026 — 1,391 subscribers1,3916 August 202616 September 2026
8 measurements spanning 41 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,382–1,393 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Sept 2026, 07:161,391+8
12 Sept 2026, 12:401,383-2
25 Aug 2026, 13:531,385-4
22 Aug 2026, 14:341,389-3
18 Aug 2026, 19:231,392+1
15 Aug 2026, 12:381,391+1
6 Aug 2026, 07:511,390no change
6 Aug 2026, 02:031,390first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 19 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Recent posts

3 Aug 2026, 23:39 UTC≈506 views60 reactionsread 6 August 2026

^ И, традиционно, "и в чем она не права". Мы все помним случай, как клиентка попросила Фрейда не пиздеть, а просто молча ее послушать. Так родился психоанализ. Потом после долго слушания аналитики стали обобщать опыт и делиться друг с другом психоаналитической теорией. Так же они заметили, что клиенты не только говорят, но и действуют. К этим действиям тоже можно прислушиваться. Чем примечательные подобные аналити

6 Jul 2026, 07:17 UTC≈1,710 views38 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Мой любимый жанр: ссышь человеку в глаза, а там божья роса когда люди позитивно реагируют на комментарии.

5 Jul 2026, 22:26 UTC≈1,400 views28 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Если вам лень читать весь предыдущий пост.

5 Jul 2026, 20:06 UTC≈1,220 views26 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Шутки про протоколы. Про остальное я тоже уже шутил: «Нельзя просто так сказать "Люби себя!", надо сначала втереться в доверие, а потом уже сказать "Люби себя"», например. Или "Если ты не веришь в перенос, то он не может тебе навредить". Или анекдот про коров. Я, кстати, рассказал его одному КПТ-шнику, и он такой: "Некогда целовать!". При этом, разумеется, все короткие инструментальные методы прекрасно работают, но

4 Jul 2026, 13:50 UTC≈1,860 views62 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Отто Ранк сообщил в циркулярном письме от 1923 г. членам Международной психоаналитической ассоциации: «Профессор (Фрейд) говорит, что нам следует принять московскую группу. Тогда мы, по крайней мере, сможем их хоть немного контролировать. Конечно, они ужасны, но они не могут быть хуже, личностно или профессионально, чем группа в Нью-Йорке. В типичном рекламном объявлении из одной Санкт-Петербургской газеты я обнаруж

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @because_fuck_you_thats_why. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Экзистенция от Э до Я” (@because_fuck_you_thats_why), 1,391 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/because_fuck_you_thats_why.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.