Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

цирк уехал, а мы остались🎪

@beblioteka_mechty

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

3,779subscribers

-23 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001975900350
TypeChannel
Username@beblioteka_mechty
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/beblioteka_mechty

Growth

3,7793,8023,790.57 August 2026 — 3,802 subscribers7 August 2026 — 3,802 subscribers10 August 2026 — 3,788 subscribers13 August 2026 — 3,779 subscribers7 August 202613 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 6 days, net -23. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,776–3,805 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 13:163,779-9
10 Aug 2026, 17:133,788-14
7 Aug 2026, 08:143,802no change
7 Aug 2026, 03:463,802first reading

Engagement

7 posts held, back to 3 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 4 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
3.80%
avg views ÷ 3,779 subscribers
Avg views / post
143
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
13.1%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
7
of 7 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held7 (3 August 20267 August 2026)
Views total1,004
Reactions total132
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 06:12 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

132 reactions across 7 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
4937.1%
💋2922.0%
💘1712.9%
custom 52219779661284251761410.6%
❤‍🔥118.33%
😍43.03%
32.27%
🥰32.27%
😘21.52%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 132reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 18:30 UTC70 views15 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🦢вторая распаковка, и на этот раз, у нас наконец-то фэнтези!! 💙 💙💙💙💙 💙💙💙💙💙💙💙💙 автора: Алёна Рю у автора я читала уже две книги, и обе были 10/10, как бы поразительно это было, ведь к фэнтези я отношусь более серьезно!) надеюсь эта книга, тоже оправдает мои ожидания>>> от ненависти до любви, вражда, любовный треугольник #я_твоя_пленница #распаковка

6💋4🥰3❤‍🔥1💘1

7 Aug 2026, 09:44 UTC97 views21 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🥺выбирашки… советую вам присмотреться к двум интересным книгам, которые ещё находятся в предзаказе по секрету скажу: я хочу и ту и ту! Не целуй злодея: 🧡яркие герои 🧡азиа, и атмосфера кино!! Глупые: 🧡от ненависти до любви 🧡парень бэд-бой

9custom 52219779661284251767💋5

6 Aug 2026, 10:55 UTC372 views20 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

сегодня будут посты распаковок, и начну с этой новиночки!! 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 кроме 🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩автор: Яна Дин для начала гляньте на оформление, я готова душу за него продать, оно идеально!! черный цвет, обложка, арты>>> это темная история, с мафией, враждой, и тропом «он мой телохранитель» #никто_кроме_тебя #распаковка

10💋5😍4💘1

5 Aug 2026, 17:07 UTC122 views20 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🔡🔡🔡🔡🔡🔡🔡🔡🔡 🐻📿📚«Партия на любовь» автор: Виктория Арана ❤️книга привлекла меня с момента анонса своей аннотацией и обложкой. и зацепила тем, что в ней главный герой — теннисист. наконец-то какое-то разнообразие у меня на полках. где стояли только хоккеисты и футболисты, теперь будет стоять один теннисист. 🤩автор очень круто передаёт атмосферу соревнований и борьбы за победу. и сами персонажи не картонные, мне понра

8💋6💘4😘2

5 Aug 2026, 09:09 UTC113 views22 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

📰🧡🧡🧡🧡🧡🧡🧡🧡🧡 🧡🧡🧡🧡🧡🧡 Партия на любовь | Виктория Арана 🤩 знаете, а это даже мило, если первый подарок от молодого человека — трусы, хоть и странно. по крайней мере, мне было очень смешно с реакции главной героини, когда она увидела их с лицами BTS #переписка_героев #партия_на_любовь

💋96💘6❤‍🔥1

4 Aug 2026, 10:31 UTC117 views20 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🌟🌟🌟 милый шаблончик, 🌟🌟🌟 который попал мне прям в душу, и я очень захотела его использовать

❤‍🔥9💘5custom 522197796612842517642

3 Aug 2026, 17:12 UTC113 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

история от любимой Алисы Мейн, её книга «Элиас» навсегда осталась в моём сердце 🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍 🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍 только, любовь автор: Алиса Мейн главная героиня певица, любовь, драма и секреты я тащусь с концепции разных форзацев, на одной стороне одна картина, на другой вторая) #ничего_личного #распаковка

83custom 52219779661284251763

Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @beblioteka_mechty. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 189,219 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“цирк уехал, а мы остались🎪” (@beblioteka_mechty), 3,779 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/beblioteka_mechty.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.