🔜 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 ❗️ 1 место - @Apkakooo 2 место - @albeeeedo 3 место - @neywiddxd И немного доп наград... 4 место - @Fialka_Go_kitty_Go 5 место - @Filyich
🔥2
Signed ЗЕлен1й ДУрак
Channel
@bebebkee
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
1,989subscribers
-28 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002190571813 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @bebebkee |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/bebebkee |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 08:14 | 1,989 | -26 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 10:55 | 2,015 | -2 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 21:47 | 2,017 | first reading |
8 posts held, back to 6 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 January 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
38 reactions across 7 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 21 | 55.3% | |
| 💘 | 7 | 18.4% | |
| ❤🔥 | 4 | 10.5% | |
| 🔥 | 3 | 7.89% | |
| 😭 | 2 | 5.26% | |
| 🍓 | 1 | 2.63% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 38reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 6 January 2026 to 8 January 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🔜 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 ❗️ 1 место - @Apkakooo 2 место - @albeeeedo 3 место - @neywiddxd И немного доп наград... 4 место - @Fialka_Go_kitty_Go 5 место - @Filyich
🔥2
Signed ЗЕлен1й ДУрак
Простите за небольшую задержку! Сейчас будем выбирать победителей 😎
Signed ЗЕлен1й ДУрак
https://t.me/urunive/32744 Тьерри предлагает вам выпить самогончика. Жаль, что он воображаемый...Но черт, какой же обжигающий! Неанон, Эри Арт by @harukohasimoto @urunive | @urunive_bot ♡
💘5🍓1
Signed Неанон | 𝙔𝙤𝙪𝙧 𝙐𝙣𝙞𝙫𝙚𝙧𝙨𝙚𝙨 take’s
Иконки персонажей для "Путешествия мечты" Я планирую из этих иконок сделать эмодзипак и стикерпак. Неанон акида Тгк:https://t.me/akiq782 @urunive | @urunive_bot ♡
❤2💘1
Signed Неанон | 𝙔𝙤𝙪𝙧 𝙐𝙣𝙞𝙫𝙚𝙧𝙨𝙚𝙨 take’s
Два варианта редизайна Куркуриш (из моего замороженного комикса Пурга), так как не могла определиться. Сделала ее собственный мех более жестким как и она сама, а так же добавила больше искусственного на ее конечности и придала ему форму. Хвостик кстати у неё с её старого тела, да она захотела присобачить его, так как он сохранился, в отличии от остального тела... А самые светлые места на механическом теле, позволяющ…
🔥1
Signed Неанон | 𝙔𝙤𝙪𝙧 𝙐𝙣𝙞𝙫𝙚𝙧𝙨𝙚𝙨 take’s
Решила я значит сделать анатомию своих персонажей (ну как сделать, просто нарисовать наглядно как у них тело устроено). Ну вот как-то так. Честно я в биологии почти не бум бум, но я старалась как можно лучше и, с точки зрения науки, правильнее нарисовать и всё описать сбоку О третьей картинке: у меня несколько стилей глаз, которые я рисую персонажам, чтобы придать им больше характера во внешнем виде. Соответственно …
❤10😭2
Signed Неанон | 𝙔𝙤𝙪𝙧 𝙐𝙣𝙞𝙫𝙚𝙧𝙨𝙚𝙨 take’s
Здрасьте, оцените моего мальчика. Звать его Тьерри. 25 годиков. Немой с рождения, но по этому поводу не унывает. Отдает себя всецело своему хобби и гордится этим. Помимо пантомим, является музыкантом, любящим играть на гитаре. Что на самом деле творится в голове у Тьерри знает лишь его близкое окружение. Порой он находит привлекательными самые странные, непонятные вещи, которые он считает эстетичными (капающая вод…
❤5❤🔥4💘1
Signed Неанон | 𝙔𝙤𝙪𝙧 𝙐𝙣𝙞𝙫𝙚𝙧𝙨𝙚𝙨 take’s
обычно я предпочитаю показывать сюжетный или лорный контент (в моем понимании это 2 разные вещи) НО сегодня я хочу предложить вам посмотреть на историю с другой стороны... СО СТОРОНЫ МЕМОВ ДА мой любимый тип мемов переписки и я тут несколько отобрал чтоб вам показать надеюсь они смешные (и раскрывают персонажей тоже да) опустим тот факт что у них еще не изобрели телефоны представим что эта эра ✨ЦиФрОвИзАциИ✨ поэтому …
❤4
Signed Неанон | 𝙔𝙤𝙪𝙧 𝙐𝙣𝙞𝙫𝙚𝙧𝙨𝙚𝙨 take’s
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @bebebkee. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 905,381 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@bebebkee named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ПЕРЕЕЗД | 𝙔𝙤𝙪𝙧 𝙐𝙣𝙞𝙫𝙚𝙧𝙨𝙚𝙨” (@bebebkee), 1,989 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bebebkee.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.