Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

𝒃𝒆𝒃𝒆_𝒃𝒆𝒍𝒍𝒂

@bebe_bellax

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,075subscribers

-10 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001532234097
TypeChannel
Username@bebe_bellax
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/bebe_bellax

Growth

1,0751,0851,0807 August 2026 — 1,085 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,085 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,076 subscribers13 August 2026 — 1,075 subscribers7 August 202613 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 6 days, net -10. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,074–1,087 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 11:561,075-1
10 Aug 2026, 20:321,076-9
7 Aug 2026, 09:031,085no change
7 Aug 2026, 08:531,085first reading

Engagement

14 posts held, back to 19 February 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
46.3%
avg views ÷ 1,075 subscribers
Avg views / post
497
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.28%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 14 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 August 2026
Posts held14 (19 February 20261 August 2026)
Views total1,492
Reactions total49
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 09:03 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

282 reactions across 13 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 63.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 528532449031673184217963.5%
custom 52849758205766757927526.6%
custom 5285523351597506585289.93%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 282reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 19 February 2026 to 1 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
13
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 13 we hold a reading for · 38%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @bebe_bellax. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 14 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 19 February 2026 to 1 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Advertising

Ad load
7.14%
1 of 14 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
494
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
1,350
over 12 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
5jtCeReNx12oajzfztLg5Kd127 July 202627 July 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 19 February 2026 to 1 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

1 Aug 2026, 19:20 UTC309 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

По чуть-чуть приезжают мои посылочки для сетапа🐾 Уже не терпится все распаковать и поставить. А еще придумала, как мне кажется, гениальную идею… как сделать красивый фон, не трогая стены🤫 В общем будет видос на ютуб о переделке!👀

custom 528497582057667579211custom 52853244903167318425

27 Jul 2026, 14:43 UTC494 views20 reactions5 Starsread 7 August 2026
Advertisementerid 5jtCeReNx12oajzfztLg5KdVideo

Решила немного поэкспериментировать с кадрами и монтажом в новом обзоре… и это дало свои плоды😏 За несколько дней почти 200к просмотров🥳 🌟А собственно видео было про бюджетный геймпад Flydigi Dune Fox. На самом деле не было никаких ожиданий по поводу него, но функциональность и качество порадовали! 🤍Ссылка на геймпад - *тык* 🌟Обзор: TikTok Shorts

custom 528532449031673184210custom 52849758205766757925custom 52855233515975065855

18 Jul 2026, 21:25 UTC689 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Смена аватарки😋 Старая жутко не нравилась, но я не спец в этом и вот что удалось сгенерить с гпт…🌟

custom 528532449031673184212custom 52855233515975065851

14 Jul 2026, 16:57 UTC850 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Почти 2 недели ожидания и нам подключили интернет😓 Я имела возможность, как нормальный человек…. поиграть в кс и майн🐻 Сейчас вот смотрю на сетапчик и думаю, чтобы мне изменить в нем. Так как квартира съемная, нельзя трогать стены, а они еще и белоснежные😭 Даже полки не повесить( Придется что-то придумывать и как-то выходить из ситуации! 💬 Пока что хочется уйти немного от розового цвета и сделать все-таки фул бел

custom 528532449031673184211custom 52849758205766757926

7 Jul 2026, 18:13 UTC801 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Я переехала…😳 Даа, не просто так было моё продолжительное отсутствие в тг. За последнюю неделю было проехано 3000км на машине:) И впридачу с кошкой и было это оочень круто тяжело. Без приключений не обошлось, конечно же) По пути заваренный диск решил лопнуть из-за ямы и пришлось срочно искать в незнакомом городе человека, который сможет заново сварить… Благо нам пиздец как повезло и через часа полтора все было

custom 528532449031673184215

29 May 2026, 12:32 UTC≈1,220 views19 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

WLMOUSE YING❤️ Обзорчик на такую красивую мышку от WL уже в тт✨ 🩷Обзор 🩷Мышка 🩷Тгк wlmouse

custom 528532449031673184214custom 52849758205766757923custom 52855233515975065852

14 Apr 2026, 18:34 UTC≈1,530 views33 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Photo

Почему эта птица всегда так абьюзит??!!🌟

custom 528497582057667579222custom 528552335159750658510custom 52853244903167318421

30 Mar 2026, 12:00 UTC≈1,750 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Ну что, худеем девачьки…😭 Очень давно хотела себе беговую дорожку, чтобы хотя бы набирать норму шагов за день. Все-таки длительное времяпровождение за пк даёт о себе знать🫤 ⌨️Дальше в планах обновить стол и взять с подъемным механизмом, чтобы можно было удобно работать (кого я обманываю, конечно смотреть дорамы)

custom 528497582057667579215

15 Mar 2026, 20:15 UTC≈1,630 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Решила сразу вам в один пост закинуть ссылки на видосы🐈‍⬛ 🍡Lamzu Maya мышь - тык ✨Lamzu Maya коврик - тык

custom 528532449031673184212

14 Mar 2026, 22:07 UTC≈1,350 views14 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Photo

Ну какая милота от ламзу🥺💔 Завтра выпущу видосик с этим ковром

custom 528532449031673184214

8 Mar 2026, 14:59 UTC≈1,350 views29 reactions5 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Девчооонки, с 8 марта!🪦 Любите и цените себя, вы прекрасны - не забывайте об этом!❤️

custom 528532449031673184229

Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @bebe_bellax. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𝒃𝒆𝒃𝒆_𝒃𝒆𝒍𝒍𝒂” (@bebe_bellax), 1,075 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bebe_bellax.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.