Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for BEAUTYSENSE

Channel

BEAUTYSENSE

@beautysense

2 usernames

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Cite this entry

5,921subscribers

-63 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001711105437
TypeChannel
Usernames@beautysense @drbeautysense
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live30 August 2026
Measurements held18
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 30 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/beautysense

Growth

5,9215,9855,9537 August 2026 — 5,984 subscribers7 August 2026 — 5,984 subscribers7 August 2026 — 5,984 subscribers7 August 2026 — 5,985 subscribers8 August 2026 — 5,982 subscribers11 August 2026 — 5,973 subscribers11 August 2026 — 5,971 subscribers14 August 2026 — 5,962 subscribers15 August 2026 — 5,966 subscribers17 August 2026 — 5,958 subscribers18 August 2026 — 5,955 subscribers20 August 2026 — 5,951 subscribers22 August 2026 — 5,947 subscribers23 August 2026 — 5,942 subscribers25 August 2026 — 5,938 subscribers26 August 2026 — 5,930 subscribers28 August 2026 — 5,930 subscribers30 August 2026 — 5,921 subscribers7 August 202630 August 2026
18 measurements spanning 22 days, net -63. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,911–5,995 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
30 Aug 2026, 06:125,921-9
28 Aug 2026, 20:335,930no change
26 Aug 2026, 20:545,930-8
25 Aug 2026, 15:135,938-4
23 Aug 2026, 20:285,942-5
22 Aug 2026, 08:385,947-4
20 Aug 2026, 10:565,951-4
18 Aug 2026, 22:245,955-3
17 Aug 2026, 13:575,958-8
15 Aug 2026, 16:585,966+4
14 Aug 2026, 05:385,962-9
11 Aug 2026, 19:125,971-2
11 Aug 2026, 00:375,973-9
8 Aug 2026, 17:355,982-3
7 Aug 2026, 22:585,985+1
7 Aug 2026, 20:575,984no change
7 Aug 2026, 20:305,984no change
7 Aug 2026, 20:235,984first reading

Engagement

23 posts held, back to 20 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
11.8%
avg views ÷ 5,921 subscribers
Avg views / post
698
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.28%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
10
of 23 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held23 (20 July 202611 August 2026)
Views total6,976
Reactions total89
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 03:40 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 15s
Average length
11s

Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

224 reactions across 23 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 58.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
13058.0%
🔥4821.4%
👏198.48%
👍94.02%
💯83.57%
🤝83.57%
👌20.893%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 23 of the 23 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 224reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 23 we hold a reading for · 9%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @beautysense. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 23 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 20 July 2026 to 11 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 14:31 UTC343 views5 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

#нестрашно Миф: после «ботокса» нельзя ложиться 4 часа, иначе он «возьмется не так Ответ: в исследовании 2025 года изучали пациентов после ботулинотерапии верхней трети лица и пришли к выводу: отказ от расширенных ограничений после процедуры не ухудшал частоту осложнений и удовлетворённость пациентов. То есть строгий запрет «не ложиться 4 часа» больше похож на осторожную привычную рекомендацию, чем на правило с сил

5

9 Aug 2026, 13:29 UTC524 views6 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

6

9 Aug 2026, 13:29 UTC515 views6 reactionsread 12 August 2026

#вопросдня Нужно ли делать ботокс, если морщин как будто ещё нет? Рассказывает врач Илькина Дарья 🔊 🔊 Если у вас остались вопросы, мы с радостью ответим 🫶🏻 1. Через MAX 2. Через Telegram

4🔥2

7 Aug 2026, 14:21 UTC692 views12 reactionsread 12 August 2026

#мягкийстарт Если вы давно хотите заняться кожей, но не понимаете, с чего начать, боитесь «переборщить» или просто переживаете перед первым визитом к косметологу — эта рубрика для вас. В рубрике #мягкийстарт мы будем рассказывать, как войти в косметологию спокойно: без страха, без навязывания и с понятным планом 💫 Начать можно с самого простого — бесплатной онлайн-консультации с врачом-косметологом. Вы познакомите

9🔥3

5 Aug 2026, 14:04 UTC815 views14 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Иногда так важно не торопиться 🤍 Не всегда понятно, какой объём понравится именно вам. Поэтому начать с меньшего количества препарата — абсолютно нормально. За это время можно спокойно привыкнуть к новым губам, посмотреть, как они выглядят после полного заживления, и только потом решить, хочется ли ещё добавить. Именно поэтому поэтапная коррекция часто даёт самые гармоничные результаты ✨ 👉🏻 Узнать, кто выполнил эт

👍95

3 Aug 2026, 14:31 UTC898 views11 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
Photo

💬 Кожа жирная, но шелушится и чувствуется стянутость. Как так? Такое бывает: кожа может быть жирной по типу, но обезвоженной по состоянию. То есть поры, блеск, комедоны и высыпания есть, но при этом кожа стягивается, шелушится, щиплет от кремов и выглядит тусклой. Часто причина — в агрессивном уходе: ❗️умывание «до скрипа»; ❗️кислоты каждый день; ❗️спиртовые тоники; ❗️скрабы; ❗️отсутствие нормального увлажнения. В

11

2 Aug 2026, 16:14 UTC785 views8 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🤝8

2 Aug 2026, 16:14 UTC754 views8 reactionsread 12 August 2026

#вопросдня Как часто мне нужно ходить к косметологу? Рассказывает врач Гордуладзе Натела 🔊 🔊 Если у вас остались вопросы, мы с радостью ответим 🫶🏻 1. Через MAX 2. Через Telegram

8

1 Aug 2026, 15:03 UTC836 views8 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

SPF не обязан быть идеальным с первой попытки. Если после солнцезащитного крема появились высыпания, не спешите делать вывод, что «SPF мне не подходит». Чаще всего дело не в самом факторе защиты, а в конкретной формуле. На что стоит обратить внимание: • для жирной и проблемной кожи лучше выбирать лёгкие флюиды или гели с пометкой non-comedogenic; • если кожа сухая — комфортнее могут ощущаться кремовые текстуры; • н

8

31 Jul 2026, 14:16 UTC814 views11 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Иногда кажется, что если результат не максимальный сразу после процедуры, значит, больше ничего не изменится. Но многие методики работают совсем по-другому: сначала вы видите первые изменения, а затем организм постепенно продолжает делать свою работу. Именно поэтому врачи часто просят не оценивать итоговый результат слишком рано. В этом видео — результат сразу после процедуры и спустя три месяца. За это время ткани

💯8👌2🔥1

30 Jul 2026, 15:18 UTC846 views8 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

👏8

30 Jul 2026, 15:18 UTC816 views6 reactionsread 12 August 2026

#вопросдня Сделала Morpheus неделю назад, а результата не вижу. Это нормально? Рассказывает врач Гордуладзе Натела 🔊 🔊 Если у вас остались вопросы, мы с радостью ответим 🫶🏻 1. Через MAX 2. Через Telegram

6

Showing the 12 most recent of 23 posts we hold for @beautysense. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts edited after publishing

@beautysense edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
8 August 2026
Most recent edit
8 August 2026

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“BEAUTYSENSE” (@beautysense), 5,921 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/beautysense.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.