Channel
@beautyksuppie
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
199subscribers
+5 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002435099970 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @beautyksuppie |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/beautyksuppie |
Ecommerce storefront — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 24 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 78% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 22:21 | 199 | -7 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 13:00 | 206 | -11 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 05:19 | 217 | -6 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 03:43 | 223 | -83 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 22:28 | 306 | +105 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 05:37 | 201 | +7 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 21:31 | 194 | first reading |
7 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 7 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
91 reactions across 7 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 45 | 49.5% | |
| 🔥 | 12 | 13.2% | |
| 👍 | 9 | 9.89% | |
| 💔 | 9 | 9.89% | |
| 😁 | 7 | 7.69% | |
| 💘 | 6 | 6.59% | |
| 💅 | 2 | 2.20% | |
| 🦄 | 1 | 1.10% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 91 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
вай-вай, посмотрите какие скидки на супер-экологичную минеральную косметику ecomake Мне из ассортимента понравилось буквально всё, взяла бы на пробу бальзамы, мини-набор, бб-крем с румяшками, а ещё там есть и недурная уходовая косметика — по составам всё чисто и работяще 💚
❤11
идеальное утро сегодня выглядело так 💚 впервые попробовала маску от misshа — большое и удобное лекало, ткань маски хорошая, не сильно плотная и не тонкая как тряпочка, а также обилие сыворотки (когда достаешь маску, с неё вовсю капает) Эта маска подойдет очень сухой коже, поможет убрать шелушения, успокоить красноту от раздражения, солнышка — а мне теперь хочется изучить другие масочки бренда
❤13👍9🔥8
в эту романтично-дождливую ночь, хочется поделиться недавними солнечными деньками и снова nicheвым баловством, а именно масляными духами ARTPARFUM niche collection 7803 fougere Это 11 миллилитров масляного удовольствия — фужерный, цветочный и насыщенный аромат с нотами жасмина, туберозы и белого кедра Он сладкий, тягучий и даже громкий для своего формата — как приятно слышать, что люди чувствуют от меня шлейф Аро…
❤7🔥4
у Stellary вышла коллаборация с Эрмитажем 🗿 Очень даже симпатичненько смотрится, уже встречаю хорошие отзывы на бронзер и запечённые румяна А мраморные помадки ето моя персональная слабость 🤪
💔9❤5
вам нужна эта очищающая бадья 🔮 400 мл мицеллярного удовольствия ухватила всего за 250 рэ в Улыбке Радуги (я понимаю, что своей любовью к скидкам, палю своё бедное мышление, но я человек честный) — anyway и без скидок LIBREDERM miceclean sense стоит очень бюджетно за свой объём и качество Состав очень прост и эффективен — здесь много глицеринчика, мочевины для комфортной формулы и увлажнения и инулин как пребиотик …
❤5💘3😁2🦄1
так, продолжаю активно кринжевать — мне сестра отдала два продукта, симпатичненьких, розовеньких — один из них стик для того чтобы зализать волосы, убрать нежелательную пушистость когда делаешь прилизанный пучок на волосах или наоборот смастерить что-то фигурное из тоненьких волос у лба) Ну думаю, сейчас расскажу, порекомендую ету фигнюшку с вб за 400 рублей — только я забыла, шо сестра моя богачка 😂 и стик стоит аж…
💘3😁3❤2
хочется обесценить рассказ об антисептике, но потом заходишь к популярному блогеру и видишь в очередной раз рекомендацию стирального порошка… и понимаешь, если звезды светят, значит кому-то это нужно 🤣 я наконец-то приобрела антисептик, надоело с глистами ходить знаете ли, а кушать хочется часто и руки помыть зачастую нечем и вот сюда верные маленькие помощники приходят на помощь! у меня раньше был большой антисепт…
❤2💅2😁2
Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @beautyksuppie. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Beauty Ksuppie ✨” (@beautyksuppie), 199 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/beautyksuppie.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.