Channel
@beauty_kpi
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
1,638subscribers
+20 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001421064696 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @beauty_kpi |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 13 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/beauty_kpi |
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 17 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 57% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 08:21 | 1,638 | -10 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 19:20 | 1,648 | -2 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 10:00 | 1,650 | -3 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 20:43 | 1,653 | -4 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 22:34 | 1,657 | -4 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 23:01 | 1,661 | +45 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 05:16 | 1,616 | +2 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 18:07 | 1,614 | +1 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 15:59 | 1,613 | +2 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 07:34 | 1,611 | -5 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 08:15 | 1,616 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:48 | 1,618 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:00 | 1,618 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
14 reactions across 6 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 7 | 50.0% | |
| ❤ | 3 | 21.4% | |
| 🤣 | 3 | 21.4% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 7.14% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 14 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
📚 3 свежие книги, которые мы рекомендуем добавить в список для чтения 1. «Дневник CEO» Стивен Бартлетт — практические уроки по созданию бизнеса, лидерству, продажам, построению команды и личной эффективности. Книга основана на опыте британского предпринимателя и интервью с мировыми лидерами бизнеса. 2. «Метод StoryBrand. Расскажите о своем бренде так, чтобы в него влюбились»Дональд Миллер — книга о создании понятно…
📦 Почему Costco не делает скидок? Часть 2 Costco делает наоборот. Ограниченный ассортимент, большие объемы закупок, жесткий контроль расходов и низкие наценки позволяют компании сразу предлагать конкурентную цену без постоянных распродаж. А что с бьюти и какое отношение имеет система одного из крупнейших в мире сетей складских клубов из США? Салоны красоты попадают в противоположную ловушку. Каждый месяц: скидка …
📦 Почему Costco не делает скидок? Часть 1 Ритейлеры регулярно устраивают акции: –20%, –50%, «только сегодня». То есть приучают покупателей ждать распродаж. Costco пошла другим путем. Компания построила бизнес так, чтобы клиенту не приходилось гадать, когда цена станет выгодной. Она старается держать стоимость товаров низкой каждый день, а прибыль получать в основном за счет членских взносов, а не высокой наценки н…
🗂️ Почему могут не работать регламенты? Профессор Гарвардской школы бизнеса Эми Эдмондсон десятилетиями исследовала работу команд и пришла к выводу: поведение сотрудников в первую очередь определяется системой, а уже потом личными качествами. Если регламент регулярно нарушается, это означает, что система вознаграждает другое поведение. Рассмотрим на примере. В регламенте администратора написано: после каждого визит…
👍1
🛫 Что общего между авиадиспетчером и управляющим салоном? На первый взгляд — ничего. На самом деле у них одна и та же задача: сделать так, чтобы десятки процессов происходили одновременно, без хаоса. Авиадиспетчер следит за тем, чтобы самолеты вовремя взлетали и садились, маршруты не пересекались, а любая проблема была замечена раньше, чем станет критической. Управляющий салоном делает то же самое. Только вместо с…
5) Отказывать в записи клиентам, которые регулярно отменяют визиты?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
4) Звонить клиенту после первого визита, чтобы узнать как прошла процедура?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
3) Добавлять клиента в рассылку без отдельного согласия?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
2) Дарить скидку за отзыв?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
1) Попросить на стойке ресепшн оставить отзыв сразу после процедуры?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Друзья, продолжаем рубрику — «норм или стрём?» 🔥 📋 Тема этой среды «Клиенты». Напоминаем, что по итогам ваших ответов на опрос, мы пишем пост, в котором рассказываем, что действительно «норм», а что «стрём» и никогда не должно происходит в вашем бизнесе. Погнали⬇️
🔥1
Video, posted without a caption
🤣3
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @beauty_kpi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 5 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
5) Отказывать в записи клиентам, которые регулярно отменяют визиты?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
4) Звонить клиенту после первого визита, чтобы узнать как прошла процедура?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
3) Добавлять клиента в рассылку без отдельного согласия?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
2) Дарить скидку за отзыв?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
1) Попросить на стойке ресепшн оставить отзыв сразу после процедуры?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“KPI.bi: аналитика и бьюти-бизнес” (@beauty_kpi), 1,638 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/beauty_kpi.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.