Channel
@beauty_black_spisok
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
3,792subscribers
-20 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001679934128 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @beauty_black_spisok |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 12 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/beauty_black_spisok |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 14 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 82% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 16:59 | 3,792 | -4 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 12:21 | 3,796 | -1 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 20:20 | 3,797 | -6 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 01:03 | 3,803 | +1 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 19:53 | 3,802 | -3 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 23:03 | 3,805 | -2 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 08:54 | 3,807 | -4 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 23:36 | 3,811 | -1 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 07:16 | 3,812 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 01:34 | 3,813 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:01 | 3,812 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:51 | 3,812 | first reading |
7 posts held, back to 8 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 7 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
71 reactions across 7 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 64.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 46 | 64.8% | |
| 👀 | 10 | 14.1% | |
| 👍 | 10 | 14.1% | |
| ✍ | 5 | 7.04% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 71 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 8 March 2026 to 4 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Аккуратно мошенница ❗️❗️❗️❗️Написала , но после отказа сразу удалила смс ! Человек просит отправить Яндекс доставкой и формирует заявку, далее на почту приходит смс якобы от Яндекс доставки 🤣а далее нужно ввести все реквизиты своей карты Публикация взята из https://t.me/top_beauty_baraholka/22870 Вас обманули? Присылайте @gritsai_forum вашу ситуацию для публикации тут 💬Чат обсуждения @black_spisok_chat
👀6❤2
Добрый день! В марте 2024 года по рекомендации подруги пришла к глав.врачу и основателю клиники Global Project - Евгению Вячеславовичу Репко на удаление мелких поверхностных образований на шее в основном - после третьего ребенка обсыпало на гормональном фоне. За два месяца до этой процедуры удалила еще больше образований на животе у Пекус в Лапино , но обошлось это 500 тыс руб , после чего подруги посоветовали лаз…
❤8
Дуднекова Светлана Анатольевна - человек, который знает только то, что ему все должны. Начиналось все хорошо, провели собеседование (на вид приятная женщина, обаятельная, но невероятно двуличная, как оказалось). обещала помочь раскрутить косметологию, придумали акцию и запустили. Пошла возвращаемость, появилось постоянные клиенты и привела своих Первый звоночек был, когда она мне в 23:00 написала, чтоб я отменила к…
❤10✍1
Недавно нам в чат https://t.me/cosmetologov_chat/32205 наша подписчица написали по поводу мошенника, текст прилагаем 👇 ‼️Будьте осторожны Девочки , будьте бдительны ! этот товарищ мне предложил купить у него онлайн курсы, я сначала сомневалась, но потом решилась, тем более, он предложил хорошую скидку. Всё было нормально, он отправил мне бессрочные ссылки на Яндекс, я оплатила. Ссылки, Видео все рабочие. В следующий…
👀1
Нам в чат https://t.me/top_beauty_baraholka/21548 недавно написали о новом факте мошенничества Всем добрый день Будьте осторожны Мошенники. Предлагала девушка купить уз мойку ,перевела ей деньги Обещала отправить на следующий день .Ничего не отправила ,и удалила переписку .Еще предлагала в рассрочку реклайнер и аппарат для маникюра Я отказалась ,и перевела ей 2тыс за уз мойку ,она сказала что утром пойдет отправлят…
👀3
Нам в чат https://t.me/cosmetologov_chat/30721 недавно написали о новой схеме мошенничества и кражи данных «в чат пишет якобы пострадавшая от косметолога клиентка , после лазера ожоги и волдыри , просишь прислать фото , в личку кидает ссылку , переходишь , а там камера для селфи . Поняла что мошенница и эту даму сразу в ЧС кинула . 🫣 Я так понимаю камера это чтобы пароль через Face ID снимать» 👆Выше на фото прикреп…
👍10❤6✍4
🎉Прекрасные дамы от руководителя и команды наших сообществ поздравляем вас с 8 Марта🌷 🔥Спасибо вам за то, что вы создаёте это сообщество - своим опытом, знаниями, поддержкой и энергией Пусть ваши проекты растут, клиенты вас ценят, доход увеличивается, а работа приносит только удовольствие и новые возможности🚀 Спасибо, что вы с нами🤝
❤20
Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @beauty_black_spisok. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ЧЕРНЫЙ СПИСОК BEAUTY СФЕРЫ” (@beauty_black_spisok), 3,792 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/beauty_black_spisok.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.