Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Бородатый арбитраж 🧔

@bearded_cpa

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

6,194subscribers

-53 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001227112384
TypeChannel
Username@bearded_cpa
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/bearded_cpa

Growth

6,1946,2476,220.56 August 2026 — 6,247 subscribers6 August 2026 — 6,247 subscribers9 August 2026 — 6,235 subscribers12 August 2026 — 6,194 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 6 days, net -53. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,186–6,255 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 15:166,194-41
9 Aug 2026, 13:116,235-12
6 Aug 2026, 12:456,247no change
6 Aug 2026, 12:386,247first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 26 December 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 9 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
6s
Average length
6s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

186 reactions across 14 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥10556.5%
3820.4%
👍2614.0%
🤯147.53%
😱31.61%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 186reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 26 December 2025 to 1 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
67
across the posts below
Posts paid on
10
of 15 we hold a reading for · 67%
Most on one post
51
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @bearded_cpa. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 15 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 26 December 2025 to 1 June 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

1 Jun 2026, 15:44 UTC≈8,100 views10 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Абузим Grok Imagine 1.5 бесплатно для крео. Заходим на weavy.ai и проходим регистрацию, нам дают бесплатные кредиты, 150. Нажимаем: - Create new file и попадаем в workflow - Копируем эту ссылку https://fal.ai/models/xai/grok-imagine-video/v1.5/image-to-video и просто вставляем в наш воркфлоу Стоимость одной генерации 10 кредитов, и того мы получаем бесплатные 15 генераций 720p, 15 секунд видео, аудио-сопровождени

👍72🔥1

18 May 2026, 16:05 UTC≈7,550 views16 reactionsread 12 August 2026

О как, мы уже обучили своего AI - агента, заходить в апп сервисы, добавлять пиксели, и оставался лишь барьер ввиде ботов где нужно шарить пиксель руками в бота, теперь Дуров облегчил и это и теперь можно научить бота общаться с другими ботами! А это значит - полностью автоматическая пошарка пикселей для сервисов где нет АПИ (а у 90% сервисов нет АПИ) Сейчас - мы отправляем пиксели в 1 агента, он автоматически шар

🔥16

18 May 2026, 16:05 UTC≈7,140 viewsread 12 August 2026
Video

🧠 AI devs asked for this — and we delivered. 🤖 Bots can now talk to other bots on Telegram. 💬 Autonomous agents now have a communication layer humans can follow. 🛠 Start building!

6 May 2026, 22:26 UTC≈8,140 views8 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
Photo

Цукер таки сделал ход, который многие пытались накостылить ИИ баерами. Он выкатил официальный MCP для рекламы — то есть теперь AI можно подключать напрямую к рекламному кабинету и работать уже не на уровне “подскажи идею”, а на уровне реальных данных, реальной аналитики и реальных действий. Уже можно подключить Claude Code x Codex (GPT) Передадим антикам и сервисам аналитики "привет"😊 Потому что для MCP подключен

🔥71

27 Apr 2026, 22:17 UTC≈8,470 views10 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

7🔥3

27 Apr 2026, 22:17 UTC≈3,860 views13 reactions51 Starsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Можете закинуть, этот скрипт детектор и проверить свой трекер, на случай есть ли у вас, подмена на уровне NGINX , от всего не защитит, тут лучше смотреть глазами сервер, но однозначно что-то задетектить то что не делает КТ точно поможет. Если зеленый всё ок, но проверить стоит, если красный у вас БИНГО Заливаем на сервер: chmod +x /root/detect.sh /root/detect.sh

7🔥5👍1

27 Apr 2026, 21:55 UTC≈4,900 views25 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Минутка кибер-безопасности, ваш тех может быть не только вашим другом) Залетел тут аудитить чужой Keitaro — попросили глянуть, почему в одной кампании трафик начал редиректить на левый домен. История получилась занятная, делюсь, чтобы вы у себя то же самое проверили. Если коротко: их «интегратор» @username, который полгода назад настроил трекер и с тех пор по необходимости заходил на сервер, последние 11 дней споко

🤯87👍6🔥4

19 Mar 2026, 18:47 UTC≈5,650 views16 reactions4 Starsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Всем привет, захотелось осветить такую тему как - повсеместное использование ИИ в нашей сфере. А именно не для кого уже не секрет, что многие корпорации делегируют рутину, заменяют целые должности ИИ-агентами. И наша индустрия не стала исключением, автоматизации/кодинг/креатив уже если не на полной основе, но хотя бы на 40% уже делают ИИ-сервисы. И это неплохо, и вот я из всех утюгов, видел весь декабрь/январь это

👍86🔥2

20 Feb 2026, 13:59 UTC≈5,150 views5 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
Photo

Новый развод на капче типа "claudflare" просят вставить команду в терминал якобы подтвердить что вы не робот, и ваши пароли со всех браузеров утекут к скамерам, предупредите своих сотрудников, эт что-то новое, бывалые конечно не поведутся на странный мув с терминалом, но вот неокрепшие умы легко проделают сие манипуляцию🥰 Еще вот такую нашел https://filesynccradle.com/s2/?c=ADVomGmYfwUAHIwCAFZOOQASAAAAAADV (только д

🤯5

4 Feb 2026, 14:48 UTC≈5,410 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

@marketing_kari @krrna_pr тут какой-то приколист ходит по крупным конторам предлагает рекламу в каналах, и скамнул несколько кампаний уже. Скорей всего username опять сменится Если что он ни ко мне ни к каналам которые предлагает отношения не имеет, уточняйте у владельцев каналов перед переводом, контакты админов как правило указаны в описании канала 😶

👍1

14 Jan 2026, 21:58 UTC≈5,870 views13 reactions3 Starsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Ранее не анонсированный модуль аналитики креативов выглядит вот так 😏

🔥102😱1

14 Jan 2026, 21:53 UTC≈5,840 views12 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
File

🎯 Сам проект

🔥91👍1😱1

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @bearded_cpa. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 679,154 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Бородатый арбитраж 🧔” (@bearded_cpa), 6,194 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bearded_cpa.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.