Live stream started

Channel
BEAUTIFUL AFGHANISTAN
@beafghanistan
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
6,290subscribers
-45 since we began measuring on 5 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001563542830 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @beafghanistan |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 5 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 5 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 5 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/beafghanistan |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 27 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 43% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Oct 2026, 09:19 | 6,290 | -45 |
| 27 Sept 2026, 06:37 | 6,335 | -4 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 00:01 | 6,339 | -13 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 06:40 | 6,352 | -9 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 00:59 | 6,361 | +26 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 16:22 | 6,335 | no change |
| 5 Sept 2026, 15:47 | 6,335 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 19 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 September 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 1m 08s
- Average length
- 1m 08s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
776 reactions across 14 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 74.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 580 | 74.7% | |
| 👍 | 120 | 15.5% | |
| 👏 | 16 | 2.06% | |
| 🙏 | 16 | 2.06% | |
| 😍 | 11 | 1.42% | |
| 😢 | 7 | 0.902% | |
| 😇 | 5 | 0.644% | |
| 🤩 | 5 | 0.644% | |
| 🔥 | 4 | 0.515% | |
| 🤗 | 3 | 0.387% | |
| 🍾 | 2 | 0.258% | |
| 🏆 | 2 | 0.258% | |
| 👀 | 2 | 0.258% | |
| 👌 | 1 | 0.129% | |
| 🤷♀ | 1 | 0.129% | |
| 🤷♂ | 1 | 0.129% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 776 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 19 July 2026 to 5 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
شنبه شب ساعت ۸:۳۰ به وقت کابل، از طریق فیسبوک و تلگرام از طریق همین میکروفون لایف خواهم داشت و به سوالات شما پاسخ میدهم. بعد از لایف در مورد پروندهها، برنامههای دیگری هم خواهیم داشت که در آن درباره یک موضوع مشخص صحبت میکنیم. موضوعی که قرار است دربارهاش صحبت کنیم، بعداً برایتان نشر میکنم و هر کسی که خواست، میتواند در این بحث شرکت کند. عزیزانی که میخواهند در لایف بهصورت مستقیم گفتگو کنند، میتوانند درخواست خ…
❤54👍12😍3
#توجه خیلی از عزیزان برم پیام دادن،که آیا به مصاحبه شرکت کنن، مشکل ایجاد نمیکنه؟ باید بگویم که نخیر، با باز شدن ویزه، شرکت در مصاحبه هیچ مشکلی ایجاد نمیکنه،قبلاً هم مشکل نبود فقط یک تفاوت وجود داشت که قبلاً، به خاطر دوباره رفتن و مصرف دوباره کردن، میگفتم زمان مصاحبه را به تعویق بیندازید. و کسانی که قبلاً مصاحبه دادن،و بعداً ورق دریافت کردن، باید بگویم که دوباره به مصاحبه خواسته میشوند. و یک موضوع که وجود دارد این …
❤67👍21🤗3🙏2👏1
#توجه یک زمانی بود در باره باز شدن پروندهها پست میگذاشتی، مردم و همو آدمهایی که پروندههای خریدگی دارند یا هم کمیشنکارها، در کامنتها از خیتالوژی خود گپ میکشیدن که ویزه بند است و تا او بند باشه، هیچ چیز شروع نمیشه، حالا که ویزه هم باز شده، همی گروه دوباره میاید و در کامنتها نوشته میکنن که تراول بن تا زمانی که باشه،هیچ گپ نیست و پروندهها پیش نمیره... باید بگویم که بیسواد خان، تراول بن پیش از اینکه ویزه بند شود، جر…
❤88👍13🔥3🙏3
#توجه همو خبری که ۱۴ جولای با شما شریک کردم، حالا رسماً تأیید شد. در تاریخ ۱۴ جولای، برایتان معلوماتی را شریک کردم که بر اساس آن حدود ۷۵٪ احتمال داده میشد که در هفتههای آینده شاهد تغییرات مهم در روند پروندههای مهاجرتی و صدور ویزه باشیم. در همان پست تأکید کرده بودم که این موضوع هنوز تأیید رسمی ۱۰۰٪ ندارد و به همین دلیل با احتیاط آن را با شما شریک کردم. و گفتم برایتان که شما بعدا از سایت های رسمی هم شاهد ای خبر می…
❤125👍16🙏10🤩2🤷♂1
Live stream finished (3 hours)
Live stream started
Live stream finished (1 hour)
Live stream started
#توجه امشب در لایف، بعد از پاسخ به تمام سوالات مربوط به پروندهها، وارد یک بحث آزاد و دوستانه هم میشویم. 📌 این بخش فقط در تلگرام برگزار میشود. هر کسی که بخواهد در بحث اشتراک کند، میتواند در تلگرام مایکش را باز میکنیم و تا نظرش را بیان کند. فقط لطفاً جایگاه خود را مشخص کنید؛ یا از یک طرف دفاع کنید یا طرف مقابل را انتخاب کنید (موافق یا مخالف). اگر میخواهید در این بحث اشتراک داشته باشید، از طریق لینکهای زیر به گ…
❤30👍4🍾2
شنبه شب ساعت ۸:۳۰ به وقت کابل، از طریق فیسبوک و تلگرام لایف خواهم داشت و به سوالات شما پاسخ میدهم. عزیزانی که میخواهند در لایف بهصورت مستقیم گفتگو کنند، میتوانند درخواست خود را در کانال تلگرام ما ارسال کنند. لینک کانال تلگرام: https://t.me/beafghanistan لینک گروه تلگرام: https://t.me/beafghanis ©BEAUTIFUL AFGHANISTAN
❤36👍16😍3
هر وسیله، ارزش یک معرفی خوب را دارد. چند نفر تان با سیستمهای صوتی Aiwa خاطره دارید؟ 👀😍 #aiwa #vintage #hifi
❤22🤩3😍3🤷♀1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @beafghanistan. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@kabul_Doolar · 31,535
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 5 September 2026
@kabul0nerkh · 21,575
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 23 September 2026
@AfghanistanInternational · 19,145
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 3 October 2026
@Amazon_Persian1 · 26,546
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 13 September 2026
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“BEAUTIFUL AFGHANISTAN” (@beafghanistan), 6,290 subscribers as measured 5 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/beafghanistan.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.