Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for • ثمرات ||

Channel

• ثمرات ||

@be_reader1

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

1,202subscribers

-37 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001447382751
TypeChannel
Username@be_reader1
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live26 September 2026
Measurements held13
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 26 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/be_reader1

Topic

Literature — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 18 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 74% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1,2021,2391,220.56 August 2026 — 1,239 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,239 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,237 subscribers13 August 2026 — 1,233 subscribers16 August 2026 — 1,230 subscribers19 August 2026 — 1,228 subscribers23 August 2026 — 1,227 subscribers1 September 2026 — 1,225 subscribers4 September 2026 — 1,221 subscribers9 September 2026 — 1,214 subscribers13 September 2026 — 1,213 subscribers17 September 2026 — 1,210 subscribers26 September 2026 — 1,202 subscribers6 August 202626 September 2026
13 measurements spanning 51 days, net -37. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,196–1,245 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
26 Sept 2026, 16:371,202-8
17 Sept 2026, 20:391,210-3
13 Sept 2026, 14:381,213-1
9 Sept 2026, 22:211,214-7
4 Sept 2026, 12:181,221-4
1 Sept 2026, 06:251,225-2
23 Aug 2026, 19:061,227-1
19 Aug 2026, 22:211,228-2
16 Aug 2026, 20:231,230-3
13 Aug 2026, 01:081,233-4
10 Aug 2026, 05:221,237-2
7 Aug 2026, 07:551,239no change
6 Aug 2026, 20:461,239first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 16 November 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

30 reactions across 15 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 86.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤2686.7%
👍310.0%
👎13.33%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 30 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 16 November 2025 to 2 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Aug 2026, 02:32 UTC45 viewsread 6 August 2026

َ لا يوجد كمالي راضٍ عن حياته. كما قيل :"عقاب من لا شيء يعجبهم، لا يعجبهم شيء" 📖 | #الجلاد_تحت_جلدي.

2 Aug 2026, 01:28 UTC44 viewsread 6 August 2026

َ كثيرا ما تتحول قاعدة مشروطية الحب بإنعدام العيب إلى قاعدة عامة لا تنطبق فقط على صورتنا في عين الآخر، بل تمتد لتصل إلى صورة الآخر في عيوننا، لذا ربما نورثها أبناءنا عن غير قصد، فنوهمهم أنهم ينبغي أن يكونوا كاملين ليكونوا محبوبين! 📖 | #الجلاد_تحت_جلدي.

1 Aug 2026, 05:07 UTC57 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026

َ لا كمالية مجانية، ولا معايير مرتفعة دون إرهاق وعنت، ولا مثالية دون تكلفة باهظة! 📖 | #الجلاد_تحت_جلدي.

❤1

1 Aug 2026, 01:26 UTC56 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026

َ حالة الشلل العارم التي قد تصيبنا إنما تنبع من سعينا نحو الكمال نفسه، وأن التعطل والركود هو النتاج النهائي وثيق الصلة بعقلية الكمالية فينا! فحالة التعطل ليست نتيجة عدم قدرتنا على إعادة تفعيل السعي الكمالي فينا، وإنما التعطل هو المحطة الحتمية الأخيرة لبنية الكمالية نفسِها. 📖 | #الجلاد_تحت_جلدي.

❤1

31 Jul 2026, 23:03 UTC49 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026

َ الكمالية ليست طلبًا للمزيد قدر كونها محاولة أن نشعر بخوف أقل. 📖 | #الجلاد_تحت_جلدي.

❤1

31 Jul 2026, 14:36 UTC57 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026

يسرّنا أن نستفتح عودتنا بقراءة كتاب «الجلاد تحت جلدي - لدكتور عماد رشاد ». فمن يرغب في مشاركتنا هذه الرحلة القرائية، فمرحبًا به. 🌷

👍2❤1

31 Jul 2026, 14:17 UTC57 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026

السلام عليكم ورحمة الله وبركاته 🌿 عساكم بخير جميعًا. انقطعنا فترة، لكن الحمد لله عدنا من جديد. شكرًا لكل من بقي معنا، ونسأل الله أن يبارك هذه العودة. 🤍

❤2

27 May 2026, 15:15 UTC428 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026

السلام عليكم ورحمة الله عيدكم مبارك ، وكل عام وأنتم بخير وصحة وعافية والقابلة على أمانيكم. 💕

❤2

19 May 2026, 22:29 UTC435 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026

"كلُّ ابن أنثى وإن طالت سلامتُهُ يوما على آلة حدباءَ محمولُ" _كعب بن زهير -رضي الله عنه-.

❤1

9 May 2026, 09:59 UTC502 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026

"فمن العجائب والعجائب جمة قرب الدواء وما إليه وصولٌ كالعيس في البيداء يقتلها الظمأ والماء فوق ظهورها محمولٌ".

❤1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @be_reader1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

الإسلام ديننا والقرآن منهجنا 📮"
@ALRESALAh2 · 21,767
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 22 September 2026
جـُـورِي💗𓋜
@jorya1997 · 25,348
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 24 September 2026
أُمَةٌ مُسْلِمَةٌ🔻
@Mos_lmaa · 23,336
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 18 September 2026
أسرار العربية
@aadab6 · 26,654
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 12 September 2026

This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“• ثمرات ||” (@be_reader1), 1,202 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/be_reader1.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.