Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Bdk edit

Channel

Bdk edit

@bdkeditbdk

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

9,176subscribers

-6 since we began measuring on 16 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001812184834
TypeChannel
Username@bdkeditbdk
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded16 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/bdkeditbdk

Growth

9,1769,1829,17916 Aug 2026, 19:01 — 9,182 subscribers16 Aug 2026, 19:15 — 9,182 subscribers17 Aug 2026, 12:03 — 9,176 subscribers16 Aug 2026, 19:0117 Aug 2026, 12:03
3 measurements taken within a single day, net -6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,175–9,183 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Aug 2026, 12:039,176-6
16 Aug 2026, 19:159,182no change
16 Aug 2026, 19:019,182first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 5 October 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 13s
Average length
15s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

747 reactions across 15 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
27636.9%
🔥23231.1%
👍7810.4%
❤‍🔥456.02%
🆒233.08%
🗿222.95%
😱131.74%
🤷‍♂81.07%
🥰70.937%
👀60.803%
😈50.669%
🙈50.669%
😎40.535%
🙏40.535%
🫡40.535%
👌30.402%
🤩30.402%
🥴30.402%
💯20.268%
😢20.268%
1 further kind20.268%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 747reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 5 October 2024 to 1 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

1 Apr 2026, 20:33 UTC≈3,350 views34 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

🔥229👀2😈1

1 Apr 2026, 20:31 UTC≈3,330 views15 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

🔥105

30 Mar 2026, 13:27 UTC≈3,360 views17 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

10🔥5🗿1🫡1

10 Mar 2026, 20:05 UTC≈4,310 views9 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Poll

I use CapCut for my edits

  1. Yes76%
  2. No24%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

7🔥2

9 Jun 2025, 21:16 UTC≈11,500 views84 reactionsread 16 August 2026

Yo kings 🙋‍♂️ Do y’all still fw CapCut? Like everything is pro now even the smooth slo-mo, I believe we’ll have to pay for the export in the future too like Tf. If yall want i could still go with CapCut and make videos, or like alight Motion videos, let me know your opinion ❗️

52👍11🙈5👀4🤷‍♂4🙏4🔥2😢2

2 Mar 2025, 20:18 UTC≈17,100 views31 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

Capcut smooth Football edit uploaded ✅ On YouTube @bdkeditbsk

21👍5🔥2🥰2😱1

1 Mar 2025, 13:59 UTC≈14,800 views29 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Video

The tutorial will be published tomorrow. Go subscribe so you don’t miss it! And appreciate your support ❤️🫶🏻

23❤‍🔥3👍2🗿1

22 Feb 2025, 15:54 UTC≈15,800 views58 reactionsread 16 August 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

❤‍🔥31👍15🔥72😱2🥰1

22 Feb 2025, 15:54 UTC≈14,300 views27 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

CapCut skull edit Tutorial Go watch on YouTube

20👍3🔥2🆒2

24 Dec 2024, 14:12 UTC≈15,100 views45 reactionsread 16 August 2026

For those who can’t find my new channel here is the link New channel 🔗

🔥23👍12🥰42😎2🆒2

24 Dec 2024, 13:03 UTC≈14,100 views67 reactionsread 16 August 2026

Okay guys my bad for not posting anymore, so ima be back to making Tutorials again. I literally miss y’all so bad like I’m not even yapping. So the new videos will be kinda different, I might put some voice overs like me talking, for you guys to understand it better, so yeah see you in the next new video

🔥379👍7😱5🗿4🆒3💯2

15 Oct 2024, 19:02 UTC≈20,000 views170 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

🔥9723🗿14👍9🆒6❤‍🔥5🤷‍♂4👌3

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @bdkeditbdk. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

10 Mar 2026, 20:05 UTCAnonymous Poll462 voters

I use CapCut for my edits

  1. Yes76%
  2. No24%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 5 October 2024 to 1 April 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

ASIF OMAR YOUTUBE 2
@asifomaryoutube2 · 94,969
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 41 here — alongside 40 others — read 16 August 2026
EDIT WITH BK ⚡
@editwithbk · 94,231
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 48 here — alongside 47 others — read 16 August 2026
David editor
@david_editor · 160,961
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 40 here — alongside 39 others — read 16 August 2026
Jayanta Bhai
@jayantabhai06 · 101,796
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 47 here — alongside 46 others — read 16 August 2026

This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Bdk edit” (@bdkeditbdk), 9,176 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bdkeditbdk.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.