Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

BCharts

@bchartsnet

Verified by Telegram

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,938subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001731364895
TypeChannel
Username@bchartsnet
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/bchartsnet

Growth

1,9381,9401,9397 August 2026 — 1,940 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,940 subscribers11 August 2026 — 1,938 subscribers7 August 202611 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 4 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,938–1,940 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 00:111,938-2
7 Aug 2026, 01:161,940no change
7 Aug 2026, 01:031,940first reading

Engagement

14 posts held, back to 10 October 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 October 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 37s
Average length
49s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,098 reactions across 14 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
49344.9%
🔥25122.9%
🥱11910.8%
😴666.01%
👎565.10%
👍393.55%
😁333.01%
🎉100.911%
❤‍🔥70.638%
🤔50.455%
🤣50.455%
🕊40.364%
🤪30.273%
🥰30.273%
👏20.182%
🥴20.182%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,098reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 10 October 2024 to 11 October 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

11 Oct 2024, 03:07 UTC≈9,630 views183 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

CARIMBA QUE É BRAT! 🟩 Charli xcx continua sua era dando banho de cultura pop. “Brat and it’s completely different but also still brat” é literalmente diferente e já está nos streamings de música com participações de Ariana Grande, Tinashe e mais.

🔥121🥱3813👍5👎4🥰1🥴1

11 Oct 2024, 01:58 UTC≈9,300 views115 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Há 5 anos, Jão atingia o ápice de sua sofrência ao lançar o “ANTI-HERÓI”, seu segundo álbum de estúdio. Em 10 faixas, o álbum se referia ao término de um relacionamento do cantor e portanto apresenta faixas que remetem à uma dor de corno daquelas, como o primeiro single “Enquanto Me Beija”, e pop perfections como “Essa Eu Fiz Pro Nosso Amor” - a melhor música do disco. Na época, todas as faixas estrearam no top 200 d

55👎39🥱14👍3🤣2👏1🥴1

11 Oct 2024, 00:03 UTC≈5,880 views63 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🚨ELA VOLTOU! Com um pop animado, Jennie do BLACKPINK lança seu novo single solo “Mantra.” Ouça!

40👍8❤‍🔥7🤔4👎3🤣1

10 Oct 2024, 23:32 UTC≈4,430 views78 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Há incríveis 10 ANOS Marina (and The Diamonds) lançava o áudio de “Froot” no dia do seu aniversário como um presente para os fãs, mudando o curso da história. A música foi tão bem recebida que se tornou o 1º single do álbum. Você viveu? 🍇

72😁4👏1🤔1

10 Oct 2024, 23:02 UTC≈2,930 views58 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Artistas com maiores picos de ouvintes mensais na HISTÓRIA do Spotify 🎧 #1. The Weeknd 120.47M #2. Taylor Swift 116.23M #3. Bruno Mars 109.31M #4. Billie Eilish 108.21M #5. Lady Gaga 105.04M #6. Ariana Grande 99.65M #7. Post Malone 98.47M #8. Justin Bieber 95.4M #9. Coldplay 92.6M #10. Mariah Carey 90.6M #11. Ed Sheeran 87.9M #12. Rihanna 87.3M #13. Drake 86.6M #14. Miley Cyrus 85.2M #15. Bad Bunny 84.5M

45🥱13

10 Oct 2024, 22:28 UTC≈2,530 views107 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Lady Gaga ultrapassa 105 milhões de ouvintes mensais no Spotify pela primeira vez. A narigudinha se torna apenas a 5ª artista na HISTÓRIA a atingir esse marco na plataforma.

78🥱16🎉10🔥3

10 Oct 2024, 22:27 UTC≈2,210 views54 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

E São Paulo? The Weekend segue como o #1 do Spotify e quebra seu próprio RECORDE na plataforma como o artista com mais ouvintes mensais na história. O querido chegou a 120,469 milhões.

35🥱18👍1

10 Oct 2024, 22:18 UTC≈2,110 views64 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Com maior marketing da história, Charli xcx para um parque de Nova York e mobiliza fãs para ouvirem o álbum de remixes do “BRAT”. Ela tocou todas as música dentro de um vinyl gigante e ainda transmitiu tudo via Twich. O disco com novas versões sai meia-noite nas plataformas digitais. Essa é mulher! 💚

51🥱12🔥1

10 Oct 2024, 18:29 UTC≈1,910 views39 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Dando continuidade na divulgação de seu novo álbum, “The Great Impersonator”, Halsey lança a lindinha “I Never Loved You”.

27👎10🥰2

10 Oct 2024, 16:32 UTC≈1,790 views57 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Ela conhece seu público! JADE está vendendo jockstraps em seu site oficial.

🔥49🕊42🤣2

10 Oct 2024, 15:46 UTC≈1,760 views96 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

A campanha começou. Billie Eilish diz para o Los Angeles Times que chegou a considerar que “Birds of a Feather” era a sua pior música. “Em alguns momentos eu pensava: ‘essa é a nossa pior música’. Eu achava que era muito pop e que todo mundo iria odiar”, revelou a candidata que se reelegeu como Prefeita e comandará a Coitadolândia por mais um mandato. Mesmo sem ser single inicialmente, a música se tornou um dos maio

😴66😁19🥱73👍1

10 Oct 2024, 15:31 UTC≈2,600 views31 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Um dos maiores hits dos anos 2000 quase foi parar na voz da Web Diva Xila Maria River Red. Ciara revela que seu single de estreia, “Goodies”, quase ficou com Britney Spears. Ela disse no programa de Kelly Clarkson que a gravadora estava tentando dar música para a loira, que era o maior nome da música na época, enquanto ela era apenas uma novata: “Fiquei sabendo depois, mas estavam tentando dar minha música pra Britne

👍178🤪3😁3

Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @bchartsnet. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,009,057 of 1,189,255entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“BCharts” (@bchartsnet), 1,938 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bchartsnet.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.