Channel
@bbusuk
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 15 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003962944864 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @bbusuk |
| Created | 10 May 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 15 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/bbusuk |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 06:30 | 1 | no change |
| 15 Aug 2026, 06:18 | 1 | first reading |
3 posts held, back to 10 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 3 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
💭🍏 fruit season has quietly unfurled, and every little greengrocer now resembles a patchwork of jubilant pennants. 𝚝𝚊𝚗𝚐𝚎𝚛𝚒𝚗𝚎𝚜 𝚊𝚏𝚕𝚊𝚖𝚎 𝚠𝚒𝚝𝚑 𝚊𝚖𝚋𝚎𝚛, 𝚐𝚛𝚊𝚙𝚎𝚜 𝚍𝚛𝚊𝚙𝚎𝚍 𝚒𝚗 𝚍𝚞𝚜𝚔𝚢 𝚟𝚒𝚘𝚕𝚎𝚝, 𝚙𝚎𝚊𝚛𝚜 𝚜𝚝𝚎𝚎𝚙𝚎𝚍 𝚒𝚗 𝚖𝚞𝚝𝚎𝚍 𝚓𝚊𝚍𝚎—each one vying for a fleeting admiration. ᡣ𐭩 yet among such lavish abundance, my gaze gravitated to 🏵 @sohreenrobot instead /&. the sweetest rarity on display : @disttribusi 💛 modestly captioned 🏠
Duras
Channel created
Showing the 3 most recent of 3 posts we hold for @bbusuk. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,480,510 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Busuk” (@bbusuk), 1 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bbusuk.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.