Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Беспилотное Братство

Channel

Беспилотное Братство

@bbespilot

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry

16,631subscribers

+1,573 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002413329008
TypeChannel
Username@bbespilot
DescriptionВсё увиденное или созданное в информативных целях, все люди, а также посты плод воображения и показаны случайно. Автор находится в зоне специальной военной операции. Связь/Сотрудничество - @answerup Символ новой военной эпохи.🇷🇺
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 November 2026
Measurements held63
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/bbespilot

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 93% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (2 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@bbespilot/3166 · this entry1 Nov 2026, 07:51 UTC@mil_hub/1392201 Nov 2026, 08:19 UTC1.0028 minutes
@bbespilot/3178 · this entry2 Nov 2026, 17:46 UTC@mil_hub/1392992 Nov 2026, 17:52 UTC1.006 minutes
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@mil_hub7 (7/7 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0086 minutesthis entry (6–1)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 60 comparable posts for this entry, running 31 July 2026 to 7 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 11 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

15,05816,63115,844.56 August 202611 November 2026
63 measurements spanning 97 days, net +1,573. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 14,822–16,867 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 63
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Nov 2026, 01:4916,631+37
9 Nov 2026, 09:3916,594+68
7 Nov 2026, 22:1616,526+13
6 Nov 2026, 17:3016,513+4
5 Nov 2026, 17:3816,509+13
4 Nov 2026, 14:5616,496-1
3 Nov 2026, 12:2916,497+18
2 Nov 2026, 12:5116,479+14
1 Nov 2026, 13:3816,465+37
31 Oct 2026, 12:5016,428+9
30 Oct 2026, 14:1016,419+6
29 Oct 2026, 16:4716,413+5
28 Oct 2026, 17:4016,408+2
27 Oct 2026, 17:1716,406+10
26 Oct 2026, 16:1616,396-2
25 Oct 2026, 15:5416,398+3
24 Oct 2026, 17:2716,395+13
23 Oct 2026, 19:2916,382+19
22 Oct 2026, 18:0916,363+53
21 Oct 2026, 11:1916,310first reading

Engagement

120 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 70 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
24.9%
avg views ÷ 16,631 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,140
32 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.888%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
32
of 120 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 November 2026
Posts held120 (31 July 2026 – 10 November 2026)
Views total132,400
Reactions total1,176
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Nov 2026, 06:10 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈1,450
Videos
≈734
Links
≈769

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
45m 24s
Average length
1m 14s

Measured directly from 37 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

4,638 reactions across 114 posts, in 24 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 15.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥73015.7%
❤61613.3%
😁60513.0%
👍49510.7%
🤣47410.2%
🫡3086.64%
custom 53685786131237800182615.63%
custom 53053934852164930432184.70%
custom 53687061607675700561473.17%
custom 54046659849067205351382.98%
🤝1212.61%
👀901.94%
💯891.92%
custom 5368452349675215001591.27%
custom 5368507415450916117541.16%
🤬440.949%
🤯370.798%
⚡350.755%
👎330.712%
custom 5404855255525520927250.539%
4 further kinds591.27%

Custom emoji. 7 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 120 of the 120 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,881 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 120 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 10 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
528
across the posts below
Posts paid on
23
of 120 we hold a reading for · 19%
Most on one post
388
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @bbespilot. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 120 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 31 July 2026 to 10 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 10 of 32 posts held from the last 30 days (31.3%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

10 Nov 2026, 20:09 UTC≈1,790 views51 reactionsread 11 November 2026

А мы продолжим свои действия в африканском корпусе и продолжим обучать вас тематике fpv, чтобы вы могли поражать голожопых негритят

❤20custom 54046659849067205359🔥7🤣5👀3👍2👎2custom 53053934852164930432

10 Nov 2026, 20:08 UTC≈1,550 views26 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Forwarded from @ptsd_again

если в ближайшее время случится договорнячок, я удалю канал

custom 540466598490672053516🔥3custom 53053934852164930433🙏2❤1👀1

10 Nov 2026, 15:21 UTC≈2,860 views84 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Всем зарплата пришла ? Скидываем на ротную кассу по 25 тысяч 2202206917146727

🤣65🔥9👎4custom 53053934852164930432👀1🤬1😁1custom 54046659849067205351

8 Nov 2026, 19:50 UTC≈6,660 views68 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Новые СВУ хохлов

custom 536857861312378001842🤯11🫡10🤝2👍1custom 53053934852164930431custom 60396114786784408421

8 Nov 2026, 10:16 UTC≈4,320 views43 reactions1 Starread 11 November 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

😁19custom 53687061607675700568👎6❤5👀4custom 53685786131237800181

7 Nov 2026, 18:24 UTC≈10,900 views55 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Video

Размножьте информацию Это уёбище садится на кроны деревьев и наблюдает, крутя головой в секторе 180°, а благодаря цифровым видео передатчикам, качество изображения - хорошее. Батареи на 50.000 mAh позволяют сидеть на палеве сутками, передавая информацию о движении наших групп.

🤝31👍7❤6custom 53053934852164930436🫡4🔥1

7 Nov 2026, 16:21 UTC≈5,260 views12 reactionsread 11 November 2026

❗️Возможно ли подавить передачу? Да возможно, но это крайне сложно т.к передатчик способен выдавать мощность до 10 ват на каждый выход, а качественные антенны усилят сигнал В МЕШ сети используется динамическая маршрутизация, то есть информация передаётся от терминала (ретранслятора) к терминалу что бы минимизировать потери пакетов данных ❗️Что же по частотам на обоих модулях? Частоту можно выбрать при заказе модемо…

👍7❤1👎1🫡1custom 53685786131237800181custom 54046659849067205351

7 Nov 2026, 15:08 UTC≈4,490 views12 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Ещё такие варианты есть у хохлов высокочастотный

custom 53685786131237800186🫡4🤝1🤯1

7 Nov 2026, 14:35 UTC≈4,460 views10 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

👍5❤2🔥1🫡1custom 60396114786784408421

7 Nov 2026, 14:34 UTC≈4,910 views16 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

📶Меш-сеть (Mesh-сеть, ячеистая сеть) - это децентрализованная сеть, в которой каждое устройство (узел) соединяется напрямую с соседними устройствами и может передавать данные для других, выступая одновременно и клиентом (приемником сигнала) и ретранслятором сигнала для другого клиента. На практике сейчас используют меш модемы БПЛА "Лис", наши крупные БПЛА типа "Герань", "Гербера" и другие На фото представлен Китайски…

❤10👍4⚡1🫡1

7 Nov 2026, 14:33 UTC≈3,510 views18 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Такси «Беспилотное Братство» 🤩 Довезем куда угодно, заберем откуда угодно.✈️ Действуем в зоне специальной военной операции🇷🇺 📌Доставка продуктов, обмундирования, гуманитарной помощи, дронов, техники, доставка почты/озон/вайлдберис с ростовской области и любых регионов 💫Помощь в сложных ситуациях, подбор профессиональных и бесстрашных водителей Приемлимые цены, работаем круглосуточно🏪 Мы с компанией такси заключ…

❤9🔥3⚡2👍2👎2

5 Nov 2026, 16:36 UTC≈3,920 views71 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Video

Меньше понтов - больше мозгов, ёпта Вступай в ряды специалистов. Хохлы уже заебались ждать пока ты придешь! Только подразделения которые наносят больший урон - только БПЛА! Выплаты, льготы, заебатые командиры. Хватит быть связанным с пепси колой, научим тебя, уже сегодня! - Контакт для связи @answerup

🤣33🫡16❤8🔥4custom 53684523496752150013💘2custom 54048552555255209272🤬1

Showing the 12 most recent of 120 posts we hold for @bbespilot. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts edited after publishing

@bbespilot edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
8 August 2026
Most recent edit
4 November 2026

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 9 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Беспилотное Братство” (@bbespilot), 16,631 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bbespilot.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.