Channel
@bbelochka_mua
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Declared links · Cite this entry
1,325subscribers
-4 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001827556122 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @bbelochka_mua |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/bbelochka_mua |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Aug 2026, 10:25 | 1,325 | -1 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 01:13 | 1,326 | -2 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 23:09 | 1,328 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 04:00 | 1,329 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 03:51 | 1,329 | first reading |
4 posts held, back to 27 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 4 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
150 reactions across 4 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5411346205240207972 | 41 | 27.3% | |
| custom 5269389547468245998 | 35 | 23.3% | |
| custom 5220082330772717942 | 22 | 14.7% | |
| custom 5220102491349203995 | 18 | 12.0% | |
| custom 5420586221787166493 | 14 | 9.33% | |
| custom 6325709519531804298 | 11 | 7.33% | |
| custom 5341442825064045042 | 9 | 6.00% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 4 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 150reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 4 most recent posts we hold, published 27 April 2026 to 28 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
наши красивые выпускницы и просто девочки🫠 спасибо за ваше доверие💕🫂 сборы в 4 руки с @tatiyana_bagdasar 📍в студии по адресу: Энгельса, 60, БЦ Галакс ✏️ ДЛЯ ЗАПИСИ @bolshaya_belochka
custom 541134620524020797214custom 54205862217871664937custom 52693895474682459986
💕💕💕 💕💕💕💕💕💕💕💕💕 💕💕💕💕💕💕💕🤩 на днях я совершила жесткий налёт на Галактику 🔫 и урвала там крутые ништячки!!!😋 смотрите видосики, специально поделила на кусочки, чтобы у вас быстрее загружалось🫂 📎ниже прикрепляю список косметики с ссылками на озон, но это всё есть в Галактике🤍 милки тонер вивьен тональный лик 02 румяна инфлюенс пудра диваж сияющая пудра вивьен матовая 02 румяна нинель 452 спаркл нинель 324 блеск инфлюен
custom 541134620524020797223custom 52693895474682459989custom 52201024913492039956custom 63257095195318042985
девочки, врываюсь в ваш день с красивым макияжем глаз и бомбическими новинками из своей косметички🌪️💥 📎 в этом выпуске ✨ нашумевший тональный Haus Labs (бренд Леди Гаги) ✨ палетка теней Charlotte Tilbury ✨ румяна Patrick Ta ✨ набор кистей для лица ✨ увлажняющий сорбет *Darling тональный, тени, румяна (и пудру от шарлотты, которую не показала) - это роскошный люкс, который я брала у байера ZAY BEAUTY 😷👩🦳👱♀️ ✅обяз…
custom 522008233077271794222custom 522010249134920399512custom 53414428250640450429custom 52693895474682459982
сезон стартовал и быстро набирает обороты✨ окошки активно бронируются открыта запись на лето, осень и мы с @tatiyana_bagdasar без остановки создаем всё больше и больше роскошных образов, от которых глаза наших клиенток сияют ещё ярче😍 планируйте запись заранее, чтобы мы точно были с вами в этот день❤️ очень ценю ваше доверие✨ ✏️ ДЛЯ ЗАПИСИ @bolshaya_belochka
custom 526938954746824599818custom 54205862217871664937custom 63257095195318042986custom 54113462052402079724
Showing the 4 most recent of 4 posts we hold for @bbelochka_mua. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 417,082 of 1,549,376entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
2 URLs this entry has put in its own public description, shown exactly as written there. A declaration, not a verified association— we measured that the description contained this text, and nothing more. It is not a claim that this entry owns, runs or is connected to whatever the link resolves to; a description is text anyone controls, and anyone can put anyone else’s URL into it. How this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“BELOCHKA MUA💄✨” (@bbelochka_mua), 1,325 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bbelochka_mua.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.