Channel

新手必看

@bb4443nanzhi

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

3subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 October 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID	-1003498636609
Type	Channel
Username	@bb4443nanzhi
Description	專為初次預約的哥哥打造！提供最詳細的服務流程、消費說明與安全隱私保障，讓您輕鬆預約不踩雷
Created	24 July 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded	6 October 2026
Last confirmed live	6 October 2026
Measurements held	2
On Telegram	t.me/bb4443nanzhi

Growth

2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2–4 and does not start at zero.

Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)	Subscribers	Change
6 Oct 2026, 19:22	3	no change
6 Oct 2026, 18:47	3	first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 24 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days: 366.7%; avg views ÷ 3 subscribers
Avg views / post: 11.0; 1 post measured
Reaction rate: —; this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window: 1; of 16 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
Window	Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 September 2026
Posts held	16 (24 July 2026 – 28 September 2026)
Views total	11
Reactions total	—
Forwards / comments	not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken	6 Oct 2026, 19:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos: 13

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction	Count	Share	Share, drawn
❤	1	100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 28 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

28 Sept 2026, 10:13 UTC11 viewsread 6 October 2026

Forwarded from @nz13140Photo

📌 約之前先做好這幾件事，真的比較不容易有落差南南做這行一段時間後，發現哥哥們最常擔心的其實不是找不到妹妹，而是怕看到照片很期待，真正見面後卻跟想像的不一樣所以南南想分享幾個自己平常幫哥哥安排時，也會特別注意的地方 👇 ① 不要只靠照片想像真人照片可以看長相跟大概的身材比例但真正見面之後的感覺，還是會包含氣質、談吐、個性跟互動而且每個人的審美本來就不一樣哥哥覺得漂亮的類型，不一定跟其他人一樣所以照片可以當參考，但不要把照片當成全部 ② 先跟南南說你到底喜歡什麼這個其實很重要有些哥哥喜歡甜甜可愛的有些比較喜歡成熟有氣質的也有人第一眼最在意身材或皮膚你可以直接跟南南說我比較喜歡哪一種哪個地方是我最在意的甚至哪種你完全不喜歡，也可以先告訴我這樣我才不是單純看照片幫你挑，而是真的按照你的喜好去找 ③ 有疑問就直接問，不用不好意思如果你看到某個妹妹有興趣，但又怕真人不一樣其實直接問南南就好了像是…