Базовый капитал pinned a photo

Channel
Базовый капитал
@bazovcopital
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
51subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002495932505 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @bazovcopital |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 31 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 31 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/bazovcopital |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 31 Aug 2026, 05:17 | 51 | -1 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 19:37 | 52 | -1 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 15:48 | 53 | -1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 08:46 | 54 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:58 | 54 | first reading |
Engagement
17 posts held, back to 29 June 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 October 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 28s
- Average length
- 14s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
11 reactions across 11 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5035361770261185990 | 11 | 100.0% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 11 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 29 June 2025 to 5 October 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
😮Концепт вишлиста для подарков Уже кидаете Гелакси пепочек в свой вишлист
✨ Розыгрыш 200⭐ ✨ 🎁 Призы: 2 победителя! 🔹 Условия участия простые: 1. Зарегестрироватся на Bybit. 2. Первый раз зайти на бота. 3. Зайти на portals Итоги скоро
🖼 Ожидаем новые стикеры в Sticker Pack от команды Imaginary Ones Будем брать?
🎁 Ждём новые подарки в эту ночь?
Bitcoin 109.000$ ✅
custom 50353617702611859901
Опять перенесли @mint Что там намечается?
custom 50353617702611859901
☄️ Вышло новое обновление телеграм! 👀 Обновляемся и ждём новые подарки, с возможностью покупки за Ton❤️
custom 50353617702611859901
✉️ Обновление телеграм скоро… Какие пасхалки видим на картинке?
custom 50353617702611859901
🪙 Листинг NotPixel сегодня на бирже MEXC в 13:00 по МСК.
custom 50353617702611859901
СНЕСЛИ БОТА С ПОДАРКАМИ! Буквально только что снесли акк одного казино в тг. Говорят, что в нём было подарков на 150,000 💵. Использовался этот акк для выдачи и приёма тг подарков Что будет с пользовательскими подарками не понятно 🤷♂️
custom 50353617702611859901
ПАВЕЛ ДУРОВ ЗАВОЗИТ! В X Снуп Дог грязно пошутил про 106 детей Павла, но похоже, что это был спланированный пиар ход, потому что Павел перевёл всё в рекламу телеграма 😁
custom 50353617702611859901
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @bazovcopital. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 31 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Базовый капитал” (@bazovcopital), 51 subscribers as measured 31 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bazovcopital.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.