Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Базар услуг и Гарант Работяг

Channel

Базар услуг и Гарант Работяг

@bazargarant8

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

468subscribers

+6 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002318248313
TypeChannel
Username@bazargarant8
Created16 October 2024measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live24 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 24 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/bazargarant8

Growth

4624684658 August 2026 — 462 subscribers9 August 2026 — 462 subscribers16 August 2026 — 465 subscribers24 August 2026 — 468 subscribers8 August 202624 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 17 days, net +6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 461–469 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
24 Aug 2026, 21:24468+3
16 Aug 2026, 08:05465+3
9 Aug 2026, 05:55462no change
8 Aug 2026, 06:35462first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 16 October 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
61.1%
avg views ÷ 468 subscribers
Avg views / post
286
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.14%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 4 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held18 (16 October 20245 August 2026)
Views total1,144
Reactions total3
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 06:35 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

56 reactions across 9 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👎1832.1%
❤‍🔥1323.2%
👍1221.4%
🔥814.3%
🏆58.93%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 56reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 16 October 2024 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 18:51 UTC270 viewsread 8 August 2026

Если вы заметили что-то мутное или подозрительное даже со стороны админов , переспросите в хижине и у админов. Лишним не будет! Не торопитесь и внимательно проверяйте все.

5 Aug 2026, 11:59 UTC264 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Правильное оформление: Текст: Гарант: @billionaire779 Сек: @saint1337 Сек обязателен в сделках!

👍3

5 Aug 2026, 11:54 UTC268 viewsread 8 August 2026

Все посты будут удаляться с неправильным оформлением сека!

4 Aug 2026, 19:16 UTC342 viewsread 8 August 2026

Прошу внимания и бдительности! Подписчик заметил схему - сек @pramirrr сменил линк @pramirr и не сообщил об этом, скамер создал акк на этот линк. В любом случае, выше предупреждали - никто деп не оставлял у гаранта, если и утверждают такое, уточняйте у гаранта, потом заходите в сделку, добавляя сека ! Внимательность и бдительность! Не ведитесь на обман. Проверяйте все внимательно. И еще момент - теперь в секи

30 Mar 2026, 15:10 UTC987 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Если вам пишет какой-то гром и подобные продавцы техники за 50% и так далее - СКАМ! Если вас уверяют, что они лежит депозит у гаранта – уточняйте у Чанджа! И не забываем – вы открываете сделку и добавляете туда гаранта и секов! Будьте максимально бдительны и аккуратны. Лишний раз не поленитесь проверить, уточнить.

🔥5👎1

26 Feb 2026, 18:22 UTC994 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Ребят, я Базаром не занимаюсь. Вы выбрали Чанджа голосованием. Я переоткрыл Базар из-за ваших просьб. Если спорный момент - просите Чанджа открыть спор и добавить арбитров. Секи в тч могут ими выступить. 90% случаев спорных ситуаций (их было мало) по вашей невнимательности и глупости. Перед открытием спора еще раз перечитайте диалог и условия. Не доверяете гаранту - не открывайте с ним сделки. Напоминаю, у ме

👍4🏆2❤‍🔥1

13 Jan 2026, 11:35 UTC≈1,220 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Я реально скоро закрою Базар. Вы что тупите-то, ребят? Я и так не хотел никогда этим заниматься, только ради коммьюнити в это залез, но несу моральный ущерб от ответственности, нервняки. Сейчас еще и тупые вопросы. Вы не можете внимательно прочитать пару абзацев текста. Тут даже понимать не нужно, все подробно разжевано. Я беру деп на откруты, Чандж берет все иные недорогие сделки - от маников до прочих связок и

❤‍🔥7👎7

11 Jan 2026, 13:40 UTC≈1,620 viewsread 8 August 2026

Для одаренных еще раз. Честно я не ожидал, что будет так много людей, которые не поняли новый формат. Сделки по маникам, связкам, прочим недорогим продажам проводит Чандж. Секьюрити следят, чтобы гарант не взял В МОМЕНТЕ АКТИВНЫХ сделок больше, чем внёс мне контрольный депозит(150к). Страх депы для открутов принимаю только я. Что еще не понятно, муфлонцы?

7 Jan 2026, 09:07 UTC≈1,020 viewsread 8 August 2026

За не соблюдение формата публикации, объявления будут удаляться. Публикация строго в формате: - Описание - Линк для связи - @ - Гарант - @billionaire779 - Секьюрити - @saint1337 и @pramirr

7 Jan 2026, 09:01 UTC≈1,110 viewsread 8 August 2026

Итак, наконец-то, Базар перезапускается в максимально защищенном формате! ❇️Читаем внимательно! Сперва ещё раз ознакомьтесь подробно с условиями и правилами - https://t.me/bazargarant8/6 В сделке участвуют: покупатель, продавец, гарант, 2 секьюрити(секи). Сделку открывает покупатель или тот, кто переводит деньги, добавляя всех участников. Это для того, чтобы гарант не взял сделок на сумму больше, чем внёс мне к

24 Dec 2025, 20:53 UTC≈1,760 viewsread 8 August 2026

Стоп голосование. Народ выбрал Чанджа. Завтра вся информация подробно выйдет на канале. Просьба ознакомиться внимательно и соблюдать все условия . Если вы будете нарушать правила сделок будущих – ответственность полностью на вас. Пожалуйста, будьте внимательны и оценивайте все риски .

23 Dec 2025, 18:24 UTC≈1,530 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Poll

Выбираем гаранта: @billionaire779 @arskravchenko

  1. Чандж56%
  2. Арсений44%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

🏆2❤‍🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @bazargarant8. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

23 Dec 2025, 18:24 UTCAnonymous Poll232 voters

Выбираем гаранта: @billionaire779 @arskravchenko

  1. Чандж56%
  2. Арсений44%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 16 October 2024 to 5 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 654,832 of 1,627,068entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Базар услуг и Гарант Работяг” (@bazargarant8), 468 subscribers as measured 24 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bazargarant8.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.