Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Bayyina.uz

Channel

Bayyina.uz

@bayyinauz

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

30,408subscribers

-292 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001052442548
TypeChannel
Username@bayyinauz
DescriptionНамоз ва Рўза вақтлари: 👉 @Taqviymuzbot Бухоро вилояти «Чор Бакр» жоме масжиди имом хатиби Азизхўжа домла Хайруллоҳ ўғлининг саҳифаси. Канал ва БОТ ҳақида таклиф, шикоят, фикр ёки мулоҳазаларингиз бўлса @BayyinaTaklif_bot'да қолдиришингиз мумкин.
Created1 June 2016measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held35
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/bayyinauz

Topic

Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

30,40830,97130,689.56 August 2026 — 30,700 subscribers6 August 2026 — 30,700 subscribers6 August 2026 — 30,692 subscribers7 August 2026 — 30,656 subscribers8 August 2026 — 30,624 subscribers9 August 2026 — 30,618 subscribers10 August 2026 — 30,609 subscribers11 August 2026 — 30,597 subscribers12 August 2026 — 30,579 subscribers13 August 2026 — 30,886 subscribers14 August 2026 — 30,971 subscribers16 August 2026 — 30,955 subscribers17 August 2026 — 30,918 subscribers18 August 2026 — 30,895 subscribers19 August 2026 — 30,877 subscribers20 August 2026 — 30,857 subscribers21 August 2026 — 30,856 subscribers22 August 2026 — 30,838 subscribers24 August 2026 — 30,794 subscribers25 August 2026 — 30,791 subscribers26 August 2026 — 30,779 subscribers27 August 2026 — 30,759 subscribers28 August 2026 — 30,757 subscribers29 August 2026 — 30,721 subscribers30 August 2026 — 30,698 subscribers31 August 2026 — 30,671 subscribers1 September 2026 — 30,655 subscribers2 September 2026 — 30,634 subscribers4 September 2026 — 30,609 subscribers6 September 2026 — 30,581 subscribers9 September 2026 — 30,522 subscribers12 September 2026 — 30,511 subscribers13 September 2026 — 30,483 subscribers15 September 2026 — 30,453 subscribers17 September 2026 — 30,408 subscribers6 August 202617 September 2026
35 measurements spanning 42 days, net -292. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 30,324–31,055 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 35
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 12:4130,408-45
15 Sept 2026, 09:1630,453-30
13 Sept 2026, 17:1730,483-28
12 Sept 2026, 00:3630,511-11
9 Sept 2026, 17:1430,522-59
6 Sept 2026, 07:1830,581-28
4 Sept 2026, 00:5830,609-25
2 Sept 2026, 18:3530,634-21
1 Sept 2026, 18:3530,655-16
31 Aug 2026, 19:2530,671-27
30 Aug 2026, 16:1430,698-23
29 Aug 2026, 13:0730,721-36
28 Aug 2026, 12:5730,757-2
27 Aug 2026, 11:0330,759-20
26 Aug 2026, 09:4130,779-12
25 Aug 2026, 09:0430,791-3
24 Aug 2026, 07:0830,794-44
22 Aug 2026, 15:0430,838-18
21 Aug 2026, 09:0430,856-1
20 Aug 2026, 09:3630,857first reading

Engagement

370 posts held, back to 3 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 71 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
13.7%
avg views ÷ 30,408 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,170
182 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.954%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
182
of 370 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 September 2026
Posts held370 (3 August 202622 September 2026)
Views total758,697
Reactions total7,238
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken23 Sept 2026, 00:18 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
7,350
Videos
3,560
Links
14,400

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 23 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
4h 36m
Average length
2m 10s

Measured directly from 128 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

14,014 reactions across 350 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 58.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
8,17158.3%
👍3,86127.6%
🔥7775.54%
💯5313.79%
😭3782.70%
👏910.649%
🕊870.621%
💔520.371%
😍210.15%
😱180.128%
🤗140.1%
🤔130.093%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 370 of the 370 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 14,816 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 370 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 22 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
26
across the posts below
Posts paid on
10
of 370 we hold a reading for · 3%
Most on one post
15
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @bayyinauz. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 370 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 August 2026 to 22 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

22 Sept 2026, 17:45 UTC893 views9 reactionsread 23 September 2026
Video

#Хатми_Қуръон Зухруф сураси 64-78-оятлар таржимаси Қори: Муҳаммад Сиддиқ Миншавий Таржимонлар: Азизхўжа Иноятов Ғани Зикриллаев Bayyina.uz | Taqviymuz Ижтимоий тармоқларда бизни кузатинг! Telegram | Instagram | YouTube

8🕊1

22 Sept 2026, 16:35 UTC≈1,540 views15 reactionsread 23 September 2026
Video

Ҳазрати Умар савобга кўпроқ муҳтож 🕌 Бухоро вилояти Чор Бакр жоме масжиди имом хатиби — Азизхўжа домла Иноятов Bayyina.uz | Taqviym.uz Ижтимоий тармоқларда бизни кузатинг! Telegram | Instagram |

👍93🔥3

22 Sept 2026, 15:20 UTC≈2,210 views32 reactionsread 23 September 2026
Poll

Набий соллаллоҳу алайҳи васаллам: «Ким мен айтмаган нарсани мени айтди деса, ...», деганлар. Ҳадисни давом эттиринг. 📗 «Одоблар хазинаси» 1-жуз

  1. Бу дунёда Аллоҳ хор қилади20%
  2. Дўзахдан жойини олаверсин69%
  3. Қабрда азобланади6%
  4. Энди билиб оламан4%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

22👍7🔥2💔1

22 Sept 2026, 15:20 UTC≈2,110 views29 reactionsread 23 September 2026
Poll

Ҳудайбия воқеасида ҳамма саҳобалар Расулуллоҳ соллаллоҳу алайҳи васалламга қарши туриб олишганда у зот соллаллоҳу алайҳи васалламга ким оқилона маслаҳат берган? 📗 «Одоблар хазинаси» 1-жуз

  1. Убай ибн Каъб розияллоҳу анҳу17%
  2. Умар ибн Хаттоб розияллоҳу анҳу23%
  3. Умму Салама розияллоҳу анҳо52%
  4. Энди билиб оламан7%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

21👍5🔥2😭1

22 Sept 2026, 15:20 UTC≈2,060 views26 reactionsread 23 September 2026
Poll

Хандақ жангида хандақ қазишни ким маслаҳат берган? 📗 «Одоблар хазинаси» 1-жуз

  1. Убай ибн Каъб розияллоҳу анҳу18%
  2. Умар ибн Хаттоб розияллоҳу анҳу22%
  3. Салмон Форсий розияллоҳу анҳу52%
  4. Энди билиб оламан8%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

19👍4🔥2😭1

22 Sept 2026, 15:20 UTC≈2,040 views33 reactionsread 23 September 2026
Poll

Расулуллоҳ соллаллоҳу алайҳи васаллам одамларга қандай ҳолатда қарардилар? 📗 «Одоблар хазинаси» 1-жуз

  1. Бошларини буриб қарар эдилар3%
  2. Бутун гавдалари билан тўлиқ бурилиб қарар эдилар87%
  3. Кўз қирлари билан қарар эдилар8%
  4. Энди билиб оламан3%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

27🔥4👍2

22 Sept 2026, 09:15 UTC≈3,060 views29 reactionsread 23 September 2026
Video

Имом Бухорийнинг фарзандлари бўлганми? 🕌 Бухоро вилояти Чор Бакр жоме масжиди имом хатиби — Азизхўжа домла Иноятов Bayyina.uz | Taqviym.uz Ижтимоий тармоқларда бизни кузатинг! Telegram | Instagram |

18👍9🔥2

22 Sept 2026, 07:20 UTC≈4,530 views61 reactionsread 23 September 2026

Яхшилик Бу ҳаётдан кетишингдан аввал, ундан ўзинг билан олиб кета оладиган нарсаларни олиб қол: солиҳ амал, соғлом ва пок қалб, махфий садақа, яхши бир сўз ҳамда инсонлар ҳаётида қоладиган гўзал из. Зеро, жўнаб кетганингдан кейин сендан қоладиган нарса дунёдан жамғарганинг эмас, балки охиратга тақдим этганинг ва сен таниган инсонлар қалбида қолдирган яхшилигингдир. Ҳофиз Умар Ҳофиз.

👍3019💯7🔥4👏1

22 Sept 2026, 03:55 UTC≈3,990 views55 reactionsread 23 September 2026
Photo

Сиз билан баҳслашиб, ўзгаришингизни истаётган инсонларни қадрланг. Чунки сизнинг ҳалокатингизни истаган одам ҳатто хатоларингизни ҳам мақтайди.

29👍11💯9🔥5😍1

22 Sept 2026, 01:16 UTC≈3,620 views27 reactionsread 23 September 2026
Video

Bayyina.uz | Taqviymuz Ижтимоий тармоқларда бизни кузатинг! Telegram | Instagram | YouTube

14👍7🔥5💯1

21 Sept 2026, 17:45 UTC≈3,380 views23 reactionsread 23 September 2026
Video

#Хатми_Қуръон Зухруф сураси 51-63-оятлар таржимаси Қори: Муҳаммад Сиддиқ Миншавий Таржимонлар: Азизхўжа Иноятов Ғани Зикриллаев Bayyina.uz | Taqviymuz Ижтимоий тармоқларда бизни кузатинг! Telegram | Instagram | YouTube

12👍7👏1💯1🔥1😭1

21 Sept 2026, 16:31 UTC≈3,420 views37 reactionsread 23 September 2026
Poll

Расулуллоҳ соллаллоҳу алайҳи васалламга қиёмат куни энг яқин ўтирувчилар кимлар? 📗 «Одоблар хазинаси» 1-жуз

  1. Ҳусни хулқли кишилар68%
  2. Ота-онасига яхшилик қилувчилар22%
  3. Фарзандини тўғри тарбиялаганлар6%
  4. Энди билиб оламан4%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

24👍8🔥4😍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 370 posts we hold for @bayyinauz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@bayyinauz edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
9 August 2026
Most recent edit
9 August 2026

Polls

The 6 most recent of 80 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

22 Sept 2026, 15:20 UTCAnonymous Quiz977 voters

Набий соллаллоҳу алайҳи васаллам: «Ким мен айтмаган нарсани мени айтди деса, ...», деганлар. Ҳадисни давом эттиринг. 📗 «Одоблар хазинаси» 1-жуз

  1. Бу дунёда Аллоҳ хор қилади20%
  2. Дўзахдан жойини олаверсин69%
  3. Қабрда азобланади6%
  4. Энди билиб оламан4%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

22 Sept 2026, 15:20 UTCAnonymous Quiz967 voters

Расулуллоҳ соллаллоҳу алайҳи васаллам одамларга қандай ҳолатда қарардилар? 📗 «Одоблар хазинаси» 1-жуз

  1. Бошларини буриб қарар эдилар3%
  2. Бутун гавдалари билан тўлиқ бурилиб қарар эдилар87%
  3. Кўз қирлари билан қарар эдилар8%
  4. Энди билиб оламан3%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

22 Sept 2026, 15:20 UTCAnonymous Quiz938 voters

Хандақ жангида хандақ қазишни ким маслаҳат берган? 📗 «Одоблар хазинаси» 1-жуз

  1. Убай ибн Каъб розияллоҳу анҳу18%
  2. Умар ибн Хаттоб розияллоҳу анҳу22%
  3. Салмон Форсий розияллоҳу анҳу52%
  4. Энди билиб оламан8%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

22 Sept 2026, 15:20 UTCAnonymous Quiz896 voters

Ҳудайбия воқеасида ҳамма саҳобалар Расулуллоҳ соллаллоҳу алайҳи васалламга қарши туриб олишганда у зот соллаллоҳу алайҳи васалламга ким оқилона маслаҳат берган? 📗 «Одоблар хазинаси» 1-жуз

  1. Убай ибн Каъб розияллоҳу анҳу17%
  2. Умар ибн Хаттоб розияллоҳу анҳу23%
  3. Умму Салама розияллоҳу анҳо52%
  4. Энди билиб оламан7%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

21 Sept 2026, 16:31 UTCAnonymous Quiz1,570 voters approx.

Шариатимизда ҳазил-мутойиба қилиш жоизми? 📗 «Одоблар хазинаси» 1-жуз

  1. Ёлғон ишлатиб ҳазил-мутойиба қилиш жоиз4%
  2. Ҳақ гапдан бошқа нарса аралаштирмасдан ҳазил-мутойиба қилиш жоиз85%
  3. Йўқ, жоиз эмас7%
  4. Энди билиб оламан4%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

21 Sept 2026, 16:31 UTCAnonymous Quiz1,550 voters approx.

Расулуллоҳ соллаллоҳу алайҳи васаллам ичингизда энг яхшиларингиз, деб кимларни айтганлар? 📗 «Одоблар хазинаси» 1-жуз

  1. Закот берувчиларни2%
  2. Силаи раҳм қилувчиларни50%
  3. Хулқи яхшиларни46%
  4. Энди билиб оламан2%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 370 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 22 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 21 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Bayyina.uz” (@bayyinauz), 30,408 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bayyinauz.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.