Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Честный канал Башира

@bashir_d

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

1,456subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001427241198
TypeChannel
Username@bashir_d
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 31 August 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/bashir_d

Growth

1,4561,4571,456.56 August 2026 — 1,457 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,457 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,456 subscribers6 August 202610 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 4 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,456–1,457 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 06:501,456-1
6 Aug 2026, 17:171,457no change
6 Aug 2026, 17:001,457first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 30 July 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

112 reactions across 11 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
4540.2%
😁4439.3%
🤣119.82%
💯43.57%
🤝32.68%
🫡32.68%
👍10.893%
🔥10.893%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 112reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2025 to 1 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

1 Mar 2026, 12:25 UTC605 views0 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Poll

Голосуем )

  1. Дерзай!62%
  2. Нет, оставь, как есть38%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

1 Mar 2026, 12:24 UTC603 viewsread 6 August 2026

Важный вопрос🙏 Я открываю свой онлайн магазин смартфонов по хорошим ценам. Вы не против, если этот канал я под это дело переоформлю? Это будет здорово, что канал сразу не пустой. Сделаю так, если больше 60% будут ЗА Голосование⤵️ Upd: остановлю 3 марта в 15:00 мск

10 Feb 2026, 11:19 UTC706 views6 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @net_odPhoto

Как вызвать эмоции в переписке:

6

26 Jan 2026, 16:52 UTC987 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Ребят, есть тут про игроки в покер? Нужен совет 🙏

2

23 Dec 2025, 14:37 UTC≈1,170 views9 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @net_odPhoto

лучший подарок другу, я считаю

9

4 Dec 2025, 09:17 UTC≈1,340 views6 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

И в чем он соврал?) Автор

6

3 Nov 2025, 17:08 UTC≈1,230 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @net_odPoll

Есть такие чувства?

  1. Да64%
  2. Нет36%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

3 Nov 2025, 17:08 UTC≈1,020 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @net_od

Вопрос. Испытываете ли вы когда-нибудь раздражение, чувство несправедливости или обиды из-за гендерных стереотипов, связанных с мужской ролью. Я говорю о стереотипах о том, кто такой «настоящий мужчина» и что он должен или не должен делать. Ниже прикручу опрос, но также буду очень благодарен развернутым ответам в комментариях ⤵️

19 Sept 2025, 20:44 UTC≈1,340 views0 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @mitroxxinPhoto

Москва 27 сентября Будет Последний уличный фотодень в этом году Я помогу вам с подготовкой к съёмке -выбором одежды, что лучше взять с собой на съёмке - в процессе съёмки подскажу, как встать и что делать вы получите все исходники, а также сможете выбрать фотографии для обработки Будет 2 формата 30 мин - 6500 1ч - 10 000 подробности @oleg_mitrokhin

13 Sept 2025, 09:17 UTC≈1,200 views26 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

Обожаю этого чела! ссылка на автора

😁193🤝3🔥1

4 Sept 2025, 16:20 UTC≈1,190 views7 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @net_od

Типажи мужчин с проблемами в личной жизни: 1 — «темные» 2 — шизойды 3 — вечные пикаперы

6😁1

30 Aug 2025, 14:41 UTC≈1,370 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026

https://youtu.be/BHz88ujBjoE Работающий VPN — https://t.me/hitvpnbot?start=112344412655093

2

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @bashir_d. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

1 Mar 2026, 12:25 UTCFinal Results97 voters

Голосуем )

  1. Дерзай!62%
  2. Нет, оставь, как есть38%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

3 Nov 2025, 17:08 UTCAnonymous Poll282 voters

Есть такие чувства?

  1. Да64%
  2. Нет36%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2025 to 1 March 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 436,783 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Честный канал Башира” (@bashir_d), 1,456 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bashir_d.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.