KEK Unleashed pinned «RAID 😎 🤩 https://x.com/inkonchain/status/2075611086200373428 🫶 https://x.com/pepecoins/status/2075622630846038416 Take the opportunity to be positive part in the building of KEK Space. ✈️»

Channel
KEK Unleashed
@basedunleashed
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
52subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002434565837 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @basedunleashed |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 9 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/basedunleashed |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 29 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 53% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Oct 2026, 12:17 | 52 | +2 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 21:55 | 50 | +1 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 11:47 | 49 | -1 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 15:45 | 50 | -2 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 10:02 | 52 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:07 | 52 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 31 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
29 reactions across 11 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 16 | 55.2% | |
| ❤ | 9 | 31.0% | |
| 👀 | 1 | 3.45% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 3.45% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 3.45% | |
| 🤩 | 1 | 3.45% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 29 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 31 January 2026 to 10 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
RAID 😎 🤩 https://x.com/inkonchain/status/2075611086200373428 🫶 https://x.com/pepecoins/status/2075622630846038416 Take the opportunity to be positive part in the building of KEK Space. ✈️
❤2🔥1🤩1
2/7 what happened: when based labs were originally brought in, there were valid reasons to believe they could deliver the original vision. early collaboration was productive, transparent, and well received. the teams worked effectively together, the results were exciting, and the overwhelmingly positive community/market response reflected that. that part matters, because the situation should not be rewritten as “…
3/7 on the final direct communications: one of the clearest examples of the broader issue came in the final direct communications. for a long time, what we were shown was mostly interface-level progress and signs of activity. ui mockups, basic demos, screenshots, and partial previews created confidence that something was being developed. what they did not provide was enough visibility into the actual functionalit…
4/7 on the current technical state: after speaking with recent/former technical contributors to based labs, our understanding is that the situation is more serious than “a few missing features.” to put it plainly, there appears to have been a decentralized node layer, but also important centralized dependencies involved in watching and relaying ethereum-side brain activity into the network, including functions tie…
5/7 what is happening: we are actively working through the facts and possible paths forward. that includes: - speaking with recent/former technical contributors - reviewing what was actually built - understanding what state and balances can be preserved - evaluating what parts of the current network are usable - assessing whether a migration or relaunch of based is viable - and continuing work on a parallel …
6/7 on claw/the parallel path: in parallel, pepecoin has already begun contingency work on a cleaner path that can incorporate the existing based ecosystem without relying on outsourced development. that work is claw. claw is entirely a pepecoin initiative. it is not being built by based labs, and has not had contributions from current or former based labs developers. that distinction is important. we have con…
❤1
7/7 what happens next: the immediate priority is not to make another premature promise. the immediate priority is to determine the most responsible path for ecosystem continuity. as part of this, we have been evaluating the following: - can existing based balances, claims, and participation be preserved or extracted reliably? - can the current based network be repaired in a way that is worth the time and risk? …
❤2
1/7 hello frens, wanted to provide a more direct update, as a number of understandable questions remain and there have been meaningful developments since the earlier posts. the update is structured around three simple points: - what happened - what is happening - what happens next the short version is this: - when based labs were originally brought in, there were valid reasons to trust their ability to deli…
There must be a connection somewhere, what if this is where it all started going down? https://x.com/KEKUnleased/status/2034785440650117487
👀1
Kekspace Alpha Update 1.1.5 - Krakening 2.0 Bugfix Update #5 -------------------------------- https://kek.space * Please fully clear browser File & Image cache, or use an incognito / private window temporarily* Changes in v1.1.5 - Fixed a poker freeze on the River phase that blocked the match results screen from triggering. - Now actions can't be submitted at 0s. This prevents bypassing other players. - Fixed a gam…
https://claw.pepecoin.io
🔥3
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @basedunleashed. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@basedunleashed named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 11 August 2026 – 11 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“KEK Unleashed” (@basedunleashed), 52 subscribers as measured 9 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/basedunleashed.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.