Ran to $35 mil haha

Channel
boot's book of moderately ok analysis.
@basedbootalpha
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry
423subscribers
+7 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002186524480 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @basedbootalpha |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/basedbootalpha |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 88% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Oct 2026, 07:40 | 423 | -5 |
| 30 Sept 2026, 04:58 | 428 | -4 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 03:15 | 432 | -2 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 17:39 | 434 | +3 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 14:03 | 431 | +17 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 07:08 | 414 | -2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 05:33 | 416 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:58 | 416 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 23 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
49 reactions across 16 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 20 | 40.8% | |
| 🦄 | 10 | 20.4% | |
| 🤣 | 8 | 16.3% | |
| 🔥 | 5 | 10.2% | |
| 👍 | 4 | 8.16% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 2.04% | |
| 😭 | 1 | 2.04% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 49 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Enabled comments so you can fud me. Also a GC. Not sure how this TG shit works. https://t.me/+uoW-MjN2FN80YzQ1
Posted without readable text
So in hindsight this is the trade. Getting shaken out of this hunch is why I am still here posting for you vs riding juicy profits off into the sunset. Although - uniswap could have killed pons - it just didn't. The math has the details tbh. It is more profitable for devs to deploy on pons so the good coins will be there. Unless UNI crimes a coin then it won't ever be a competitor. Again, launch pad tokens are ri…
👍2🔥1
Ummmm....
❤1😭1
What absolute fucks. Ok now we have to pan for gold on this fiverr devved launchpad for the next runner. Uniswap is gay and pink for a reason.
🤣4🦄1😁1
Photo, posted without a caption
🦄1
Ok so they did a launchpad haha.
Bought more here. I had limit orders open at 15 mil but thought that would be retarded (it wasn't). This is either a post I delete because I lost bad or pons absolutely rips because uni launches something terrible/unrelated. I mean, what are you gonna speculate on $UNI? Absolutely not.
❤2🦄1
Opened a pons position before at 23 mil. Ideally would love to buy much more if the Uni announcement makes the ongoing volume question make more sense. For now we gamble and chill.
❤3🦄1
Been thinking about the pools.trade thesis. Have seen two schools of thought 1 - It's a launchpad that competes directly with all other launchpads in the RH eco. Think basically just a pump fun version but controlled by Uniswap. 2 - It's a Meteora type auction launchpad for tailored launches. Like stuff going to market at 10-20-30mil FDV etc. Not a 60k shitter bonding curve. If 1, then GG all other launchpads. Po…
❤3🔥1
Some thoughts on RH rn. https://x.com/lowercaseboot/status/2084576344609042841?s=20
❤3
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @basedbootalpha. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“boot's book of moderately ok analysis.” (@basedbootalpha), 423 subscribers as measured 11 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/basedbootalpha.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.